Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: berntjernberg
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20304#msg-20304
Hi,
To always be sure to only list processes in current zone only I always use "-z
". This simplifies coding in my opi
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: berntjernberg
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20305#msg-20305
Hi again,
Testing 1738 shows that all processes are matched from global zone. cf-execd in
a local zone was killed (fro
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20306#msg-20306
This is very difficult to understand. My own testing shows that they are not...
ok back to the drawing board.
I'm afraid that y
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: berntjernberg
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20307#msg-20307
Hi,
Just checking once more to make sure that my test wasn't wrong. Please bare
with me.
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: berntjernberg
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20308#msg-20308
Hi,
Now my bundle don't match the process at all and starts a second cf-execd in
the global zone
I'm I doing somet
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20309#msg-20309
I suspect there is some kind of irregular output in different versions of
solaris causing these problems. What a headache. I'll
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: berntjernberg
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20310#msg-20310
Ok,
My version:
# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 10/09 s10s_u8wos_08a SPARC
Copyright
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: smartphone and CFE?
Author: matter
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20311,20311#msg-20311
Greetings,
Has anybody tried putting cfengine on a smartphone? I think there would be some
usefulness to it. Being a somewhat of a luddite, I don't have a s
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: smartphone and CFE?
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20311,20312#msg-20312
See http://www.cfengine.org/cftimes/articles/43.html
I think the iphone would make this illegal, knowing apple. We've not tried
anything else yet.
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: build in function join()
Author: olee
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20313,20313#msg-20313
Hi,
has anybody got this error?
cf3:/opt/cfengine3/workdir/inputs/unit_join.cf:31,44: Unknown built-in function
join(), near token ')'
No such FnCall "
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: eystein
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20314#msg-20314
There was a bug causing it to match everything in r1737, please try r1739.
___
He
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: eystein
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20315#msg-20315
Err, it matched *nothing* in r1737 (not everything), sorry.
___
Help-cfengine mai
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: smartphone and CFE?
Author: matter
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20311,20316#msg-20316
I have been duly slapped for not reading CFtimes, ouch.
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: build in function join()
Author: phnakarin
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20313,20317#msg-20317
It works fine for me on 3.1.3.
cfengine-3.1.3# src/cf-agent -V
This comprises cf-agent core community version 3.1.3 - Copyright Copyright (C)
Cf
I’m using a SVN hook on post-commit to send a email to a bunch of important
folks with the SVN diff / files changed when I make a merge into my production
Cfengine branch.
What cool tricks are other folks using on pre-commit / post-commit. Anyone
checking / creating JIRA tickets, validating th
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: berntjernberg
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20318#msg-20318
Hi,
Tried 1747 and it match all processes, global and local. Shall I still try 1739?
_
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20319#msg-20319
All information is useful. But I'll try to look at this over the weekend.
___
Help-c
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:48:50AM -0500, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>Forum: Cfengine Help
>Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
>Author: mark
>Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20319#msg-20319
>
>All information is useful. But I'll try to look at t
On 01/28/2011 04:51 PM, Jesse Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:48:50AM -0500, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>> Forum: Cfengine Help
>> Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
>> Author: mark
>> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20298,20319#msg-20319
no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> Forum: Cfengine Help
> Subject: cfengine rpm spec file
> Author: BSDmachine
> Link to topic:
> https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20297,20297#msg-20297
>
> Is it possible to get the spec file that is used to create the RPM I
> currently download from the engine roo
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:36:11AM -0500, Mark Burgess wrote:
>
>On 01/28/2011 04:51 PM, Jesse Becker wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:48:50AM -0500, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>>> Forum: Cfengine Help
>>> Subject: Re: Processes in Solaris 10 and latest trunk r1736
>>> Author: mark
>>> Link t
>> Allowing people to choose the command will just lead to confusion.
>> Unless a specific set of columns are available, the select_process
>> functionality will not work as advertised. It just gives you rope to
>> hang yourself by.
>
> Isn't that what unix is all about--having enough rope? :)
>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:27:18AM -0500, Mike Svoboda wrote:
I?m using a SVN hook on post-commit to send a email to a bunch of important
folks with the SVN diff / files changed when I make a merge into my production
Cfengine branch.
What cool tricks are other folks using on pre-commit / post-
On 28 January 2011 17:00, Jesse Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:27:18AM -0500, Mike Svoboda wrote:
>>
>> I?m using a SVN hook on post-commit to send a email to a bunch of
>> important folks with the SVN diff / files changed when I make a merge into
>> my production Cfengine branch.
>>
>
On 01/28/2011 09:27 AM, Mike Svoboda wrote:
> I’m using a SVN hook on post-commit to send a email to a bunch of
> important folks with the SVN diff / files changed when I make a merge
> into my production Cfengine branch.
>
> What cool tricks are other folks using on pre-commit / post-commit.
> A
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Forest for the trees? Syntax error
Author: debheller
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20320,20320#msg-20320
I'm not sure what I am missing. In our custom_library.cf is the following
bundle:
bundle edit_line fix_FQHOST
{
replace_patterns:
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Forest for the trees? Syntax error
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,20320,20321#msg-20321
I think that sometimes the parser gets confused when it come across a reserved
word even if you used it in a different context.
Interesting. Are any of you using commit hooks for peer review? I.e.
"don't allow a change to go to repository unless it has been approved by
5 people"?
It seems like to implement this, you would need to initially submit your
"RFCs" (policy changes) to a different system (like Trac, I guess), a
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:51:54PM -0500, Eystein M?l?y Stenberg wrote:
>Interesting. Are any of you using commit hooks for peer review? I.e.
>"don't allow a change to go to repository unless it has been approved by
>5 people"?
I thought about this a little bit, but decided that simply reviewing t
On 1/28/2011 12:51 PM, Eystein Måløy Stenberg wrote:
> Interesting. Are any of you using commit hooks for peer review? I.e.
> "don't allow a change to go to repository unless it has been approved by
> 5 people"?
>
> It seems like to implement this, you would need to initially submit your
> "RFCs" (
Jesse Becker writes:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:51:54PM -0500, Eystein M?l?y Stenberg wrote:
>>Interesting. Are any of you using commit hooks for peer review? I.e.
>>"don't allow a change to go to repository unless it has been approved by
>>5 people"?
>
> I thought about this a little bit, but
31 matches
Mail list logo
