Hello Mindaugas
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
>
>> NOTE: CPP mode generates a GPF when ole is unloaded due to
>> refcount.
>> Mindaugas can you fix it.
>
> I can just repeat myself: can you give self containing sample?
>
GPF is in my code when I call WVG_AxShutdownConnectio
NOTE: CPP mode generates a GPF when ole is unloaded due to refcount.
Mindaugas can you fix it.
I can just repeat myself: can you give self containing sample?
Regards,
Mindaugas
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
ht
IMO the most important is not to create mess with the naming,
since it would cut us from doing anything in the future without
creating all sorts of complications.
If this issue is so pressing for you *now*, write some #translates
to fix up the names.
WVG may refer to XBP functions or functionalit
IMO The most important is that in wvg sample referring to xbp function
2009/5/28 Viktor Szakáts :
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Massimo Belgrano
> wrote:
>> WvgActiveXControl cited on your changelog is XbpActiveXControl in xbase++
>
> The current name is right. We've agreed that such Xba
Massimo, please don't spread confusion regarding this matter,
WVG *is not* an Xbase++ compatibility lib. First because it does
other things (it's a GT in the first place), secondly because it
isn't portable.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> if you should
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> WvgActiveXControl cited on your changelog is XbpActiveXControl in xbase++
The current name is right. We've agreed that such Xbase++-like classes
implemented in GTWVG get the names WVG* to not block us from creating
a portable, standalone
if you should change XBase++ parts from WVG to XBp, please do
IMO is Better for xbase user, also for find documentation ecc
Do you think that is possible (imo not important) made coexistence vwg /qt?
same problem is for all compatibility class also if you implement
gtwvg emulation for either gt l
WvgActiveXControl cited on your changelog is XbpActiveXControl in xbase++
2009/5/28 Szakáts Viktor :
>> But it was not decided about XBP_* namespace instead WVG_*.?
>
> XBP_* namespace was decided for XBase++ visual classes
> implemented in a separate lib called hbxbp.
>
> Brgds,
> Viktor
>
>>
>>
Hi
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
>
> But it was not decided about XBP_* namespace instead WVG_*.?
>
Perhaps you tend to skip few things.
Xbp_* namespace will be used as in Xbase++ in QT implementation.
For windows it will remains as is.
Viktor, Massimo's request is valid though.
Should I change
But it was not decided about XBP_* namespace instead WVG_*.?
XBP_* namespace was decided for XBase++ visual classes
implemented in a separate lib called hbxbp.
Brgds,
Viktor
2009/5/28 :
Revision: 11156
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11156&view=rev
But it was not decided about XBP_* namespace instead WVG_*.?
2009/5/28 :
> Revision: 11156
>
> http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11156&view=rev
> Author: vouchcac
> Date: 2009-05-28 07:24:55 + (Thu, 28 May 2009)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> 20
Revision: 11156
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11156&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-05-28 07:24:55 + (Thu, 28 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-28 00:19 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/gtwvg/wvgwin.c
12 matches
Mail list logo
