Hi
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote: > > But it was not decided about XBP_* namespace instead WVG_*.? > Perhaps you tend to skip few things. Xbp_* namespace will be used as in Xbase++ in QT implementation. For windows it will remains as is. Viktor, Massimo's request is valid though. Should I change XBase++ parts from WVG to XBP. It will also help in developing QT base properly. Otherwise I will end up writing two versions of the same PRG code. Few Xbase++ users have found it to be tedius. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-11156--trunk-harbour-tp23756543p23756920.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
