if you should change XBase++ parts from WVG to XBp, please do IMO is Better for xbase user, also for find documentation ecc Do you think that is possible (imo not important) made coexistence vwg /qt? same problem is for all compatibility class also if you implement gtwvg emulation for either gt lib wvg/qt Can you write a separate emulation lib? can you use same code with preprocessor trip
2009/5/28 Pritpal Bedi <bediprit...@hotmail.com>: > > Hi > > > Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote: >> >> But it was not decided about XBP_* namespace instead WVG_*.? >> > > Perhaps you tend to skip few things. > > Xbp_* namespace will be used as in Xbase++ in QT implementation. > For windows it will remains as is. > > Viktor, Massimo's request is valid though. > Should I change XBase++ parts from WVG to XBP. > It will also help in developing QT base properly. > Otherwise I will end up writing two versions of the same > PRG code. > > Few Xbase++ users have found it to be tedius. > > Regards > Pritpal Bedi > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-11156--trunk-harbour-tp23756543p23756920.html > Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > -- Massimo Belgrano _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
