IMO The most important is that in wvg sample referring to xbp function
2009/5/28 Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu>: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Massimo Belgrano <mbelgr...@deltain.it> > wrote: >> WvgActiveXControl cited on your changelog is XbpActiveXControl in xbase++ > > The current name is right. We've agreed that such Xbase++-like classes > implemented in GTWVG get the names WVG* to not block us from creating > a portable, standalone Xbase++ compatibility lib. > > If such compatibility class will be implemented in Harbour, it should be > done in hbxbp, built on AX facilities implemented in hbwin. > > Brgds, > Viktor > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > -- Massimo Belgrano _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
