Massimo, please don't spread confusion regarding this matter,
WVG *is not* an Xbase++ compatibility lib. First because it does
other things (it's a GT in the first place), secondly because it
isn't portable.

Brgds,
Viktor

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Massimo Belgrano <mbelgr...@deltain.it> wrote:
> if you should change XBase++ parts from WVG to XBp, please do
> IMO is Better for xbase user, also for find documentation ecc
> Do you think that is possible (imo not important)  made coexistence vwg /qt?
> same problem is for all compatibility class also if you implement
> gtwvg  emulation for either gt lib wvg/qt
> Can you write a separate emulation lib?
> can you  use same code with preprocessor trip
>
>
> 2009/5/28 Pritpal Bedi <bediprit...@hotmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
>>>
>>> But it was not decided about XBP_* namespace instead WVG_*.?
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps you tend to skip few things.
>>
>> Xbp_* namespace will be used as in Xbase++ in QT implementation.
>> For windows it will remains as is.
>>
>> Viktor, Massimo's request is valid though.
>> Should I change XBase++ parts from WVG to XBP.
>> It will also help in developing QT base properly.
>> Otherwise I will end up writing two versions of the same
>> PRG code.
>>
>> Few Xbase++ users have found it to be tedius.
>>
>> Regards
>> Pritpal Bedi
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-11156--trunk-harbour-tp23756543p23756920.html
>> Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Harbour mailing list
>> Harbour@harbour-project.org
>> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Massimo Belgrano
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to