On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> You missed the point, perhaps.
> The whole issue is not revolving the source file,
> but the declarations in the ChangeLog which pretends
> to the users that those changes were made by thou-self.
Not true. Users can READ the file an
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:25:38 +0200
Viktor Szak�ts wrote:
> The only connection to Ron and xhb is that I've read the Harbour list
> and saw the function name hb_retc[len]Adopt() in one of the messages
> (on 2002. Jan 23) which sparked the idea of implementing these new API
> functions in Harb
Andi
Andi Jahja-2 wrote:
>
> But could you please explain why it seems so important to mention such
> credits while people know that the codes which were borrowed (example:
> RDD stuffs), by themselves already BEAR the complainer's CopyRight. I
> could immediately understand if the borrower CHA
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:41:36 -0400
Phil Barnett wrote:
> But you are correct. The gentlemanly thing to do is to give credit to
> the author in downline GPL usage.
I have a very limited knowledge about this stuff :-).
But could you please explain why it seems so important to mention such
credit
Hello All
vouchcac wrote:
>
> /* Please try like this:
>
>1.
>- Execute wvtext.exe
>- Press F10 -> New Window
>- Press -> Boom GPF (inkey(0))
>
>2.
>- Execute wvtext.exe
>- Press F10 -> New Window
>- Click on Mai
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
If the license doesn't change anything, we probably shouldn't have one at
all, so I hope we agree that it's there to use it :) no offence meant.
Brgds,
Viktor
Well, the license DOES mean something. The GPL requires that copyrights
are carried forward into the borrowed c
Hi Mindaugas,
Il 25/04/2009 1.21, Francesco Saverio Giudice ha scritto:
No problem, Now I will try new updates.
Perfect! Now it seems to works well also with WITH OBJECT version.
Just a small error:
? :Birthday := CToD( "23/05/2006" )
Returns NIL, instead it should returns assigned date
Hi,
Il 25/04/2009 1.11, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas ha scritto:
I have tested sample I sent previous time but I get:
Error BASE/3012 Argument error: GETNAMESPACE
Called from HB_OLEAUTO:GETNAMESPACE(0)
Called from MAIN(37)
Hi,
I have the same error on my side. I've fixed it (it appeared after I'v
I have tested sample I sent previous time but I get:
Error BASE/3012 Argument error: GETNAMESPACE
Called from HB_OLEAUTO:GETNAMESPACE(0)
Called from MAIN(37)
Hi,
I have the same error on my side. I've fixed it (it appeared after I've
implemented GC pointers). But the problem on my side is th
Revision: 10933
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10933&view=rev
Author: snaiperis
Date: 2009-04-24 23:07:10 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-04-25 02:05 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt)
* harbour/contrib
Revision: 10932
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10932&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-04-24 22:56:18 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-04-24 15:41 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* harbour/contrib/gtqtc/gtqt
When try generate harbour with msvc, show this errors :
Thanks, should be fixed.
Regards,
Mindaugas
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Hi,
Il 25/04/2009 0.07, Francesco Saverio Giudice ha scritto:
Hi Mindaugas,
Il 25/04/2009 0.04, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas ha scritto:
Hi, Francesco,
... Do we have any FOR EACH sample code for OLE?
attached an example, also with datetime fields.
Can you look if FOR EACH and TIMESTAMP supp
Revision: 10931
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10931&view=rev
Author: snaiperis
Date: 2009-04-24 22:34:29 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-04-25 01:35 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt)
* harbour/contrib
Hello,
When try generate harbour with msvc, show this errors :
[ERROR]
cl.exe -nologo -I. -I../../../../include -Gs -TP -W4 -wd4127 -Ot2b1 -EHs-c-
-MT
-DHB_GC_AUTO -c ../../oleinit.c -Fooleinit.obj
oleinit.c
cl.exe -nologo -I. -I../../../../include -Gs -TP -W4 -wd4127 -Ot2b1 -EHs-c-
-MT
-D
Hi Mindaugas,
Il 25/04/2009 0.04, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas ha scritto:
Hi, Francesco,
... Do we have any FOR EACH sample code for OLE?
attached an example, also with datetime fields.
Can you look if FOR EACH and TIMESTAMP support works for you?
sure, I will check ASAP.
Best Regards,
Fr
Hi, Francesco,
... Do we have any FOR EACH sample
code for OLE?
attached an example, also with datetime fields.
Can you look if FOR EACH and TIMESTAMP support works for you?
Regards,
Mindaugas
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.or
Przemyslaw Czerpak escreveu:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Ranier Vilela wrote:
cl.exe -nologo -I. -I../../../../include -Gs -TP -W4 -wd4127 -Wall -O2xtyb1
-Gy -GS- -GR- -EHs- -DNDEBUG -DHB_FM_STATISTICS_OFF -MT -c
../../hvmall.c -Fohvmall.obj
hvmall.c
e:\harbour\harbour-1.1.0\source\vm\hvm.c(1
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> cl.exe -nologo -I. -I../../../../include -Gs -TP -W4 -wd4127 -Wall -O2xtyb1
> -Gy -GS- -GR- -EHs- -DNDEBUG -DHB_FM_STATISTICS_OFF -MT -c
> ../../hvmall.c -Fohvmall.obj
> hvmall.c
> e:\harbour\harbour-1.1.0\source\vm\hvm.c(1764) : warning C4365: '='
cl.exe -nologo -I. -I../../../../include -Gs -TP -W4 -wd4127 -Wall
-O2xtyb1 -Gy -GS- -GR- -EHs- -DNDEBUG -DHB_FM_STATISTICS_OFF -MT -c
../../eval.c -Foeval.obj
eval.c
../../eval.c(422) : warning C4242: 'initializing' : conversion from
'int' to 'USHORT', possible loss of data
../../eval.c(4
cl.exe -nologo -I. -I../../../../include -Gs -TP -W4 -wd4127 -Wall
-O2xtyb1 -Gy -GS- -GR- -EHs- -DNDEBUG -DHB_FM_STATISTICS_OFF -MT -c
../../hvmall.c -Fohvmall.obj
hvmall.c
e:\harbour\harbour-1.1.0\source\vm\hvm.c(1764) : warning C4365: '=' :
conversion from 'int' to 'USHORT', signed/unsig
2009-04-24 23:15 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt)
* harbour/contrib/hbole/olecore.c
* harbour/contrib/hbole/oleauto.prg
+ implemented FOR EACH enumeration. The code was proposed by
Przemyslaw on mailing list. Some fixes applied.
Hi,
I've put some hands on
Hi Przemek and Mindaugas,
Il 24/04/2009 13.34, Przemyslaw Czerpak ha scritto:
But I think that for final application you need sth different and the
above request is result of some current behavior misunderstanding.
thank you for explanation and for tests, but I was too fast in writing
and I
Because the goal they seek not seem to be the same as this project has
sought
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Revision: 10930
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10930&view=rev
Author: snaiperis
Date: 2009-04-24 20:15:07 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-04-24 23:15 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt)
* harbour/contrib
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Viktor Szakáts"
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Data invio: venerdi 24 aprile 2009 20.15
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Some xhb developers giving no credit when copying
workfrom Harbour
Many thanks Enrico.
You're welcome.
If you get to it, please
in opinion of most guru ( Bedi, Przemyslaw) that Harbour is today
superior (fast and reliable) to xharbour
but why not try the way of join either team
Przemyslaw is very able to define a long term way (netrdd,gtnet) with
more resource we will have a faster/better result
But the question also fo
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Ron Pinkas"
A: "Ron Pinkas" ; "Phil Krylov"
; "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
; "xHarbour Developers Mailing List"
Data invio: venerdì 24 aprile 2009 17.08
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] [Harbour] Some xhb developers
givingnocredit when copyin
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Ron Pinkas wrote:
> I've learned to accept that Harbour developers reserve the rights to rename
> function names they borrow, to "rewrite from scratch" borrowed ideas and
> extensions, to introduce borrowed yet modified syntax, all with complete
> disregard to API or user co
Many thanks Enrico.
If you get to it, please correct the link to our crew page, extension
changed to .html from .htm just recently on our site.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Enrico Maria Giordano <
e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it> wrote:
>
> -Messaggio Originale- Da: "Vikto
Reading another mail from xhb list:
> 1. From day 1, the xHarbour Developers page, included this:
--
You may review the complete list of the Harbour Developers on SourceForge at
> http://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?gr
Hi Przemek,
Yes, I saw your message. I've now read a few replies.
Ron is probably referring to the hb_retc_buffer() and friends situation,
which was developed by me in my local repository without looking into
any xhb source or employing methods used there (you have to take my
word for it, or look
Hi Phil,
> I'm considering changing all my licensed files with a new item requiring
> > mention of my name when using my work, but before I do I'd like
> > to sync my views with others.
>
> IMHO this is your right to do that but see below.
>
> > [ I don't even mention that among all the Harbour de
Hi Lorenzo,
Thanks for raising this aspect.
We can say that using any of the material inside another
projects in source form will need a mention of the project's name.
This doesn't seem very restrictive for anyone who'd
like to bundle the whole project to another one (like a Linux
distro, MinGW c
Przemyslaw Czerpak escreveu:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
[...]
If you have any opinion on this, please add it here, before doing such
action it'd be also nice to hear some xhb opinions.
Below is a message I sent few hours before your one to xHarbour
developer list.
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Ranier Vilela wrote:
Hi,
> macroy.c(1797) : warning C4065: switch statement contains 'default' but no
> 'case' labels
> macroy.c:
> line 1792: switch (yytype)
> line 1793: {
> line 1794:
> line 1795: default:
> line 1796: break;
> line 1797: }
This code is
Przemyslaw Czerpak escreveu:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Ranier Vilela wrote:
Hi,
But, Przemek can you, please, fix this:
Try it after:
2009-04-23 22:11 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
best regards,
Przemek
Ok, confirmed!
Thanks Przemek!
But, still warnings:
cl.exe
Hi
> BTW, is .ico portable? I doubt, so we should probably
> switch to .png in context of QT.
Looking into this matter.
>! Fixed wrong reference to test.dbf.
Oh, thanks.
>+ Added support for HB_QT_DIR envvar to find QT libs.
> This is the same envvar which is needed
Revision: 10929
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10929&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-04-24 14:17:17 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-04-24 16:24 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/include/hbapi
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
>> It should show if hOut is using blocking IO or not.
>> BTW PIPEs without blocking IO are usually very hard to use so if they are
>> not blocking calling process in windows we should try to fix it.
> It prints:
> =
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
[...]
> If you have any opinion on this, please add it here, before doing such
> action it'd be also nice to hear some xhb opinions.
Below is a message I sent few hours before your one to xHarbour
developer list. I didn't know that you plan to write
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Viktor Szakáts"
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Data invio: venerdì 24 aprile 2009 14.34
Oggetto: [Harbour] Some xhb developers giving no credit when copying
workfrom Harbour
[ I don't even mention that among all the Harbour developers names
o
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> If you have any opinion on this, please add it here, before doing such
> action it'd be also nice to hear some xhb opinions.
I understand your position but this can "potentially" create problems.
IANAL but distros like Debian and Fedora re
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> I wanted to raise this topic for some time, it's a quite sad one
> (especially on such a nice sunny Friday as today) so
> I was holding it off, but lately Miguel Angel Marchuet again copied
> work from Harbour without giving any credit
Hi All,
I wanted to raise this topic for some time, it's a quite sad one
(especially on such a nice sunny Friday as today) so
I was holding it off, but lately Miguel Angel Marchuet again copied
work from Harbour without giving any credit whatsoever to original
authors. Around last month I've also f
request HB_GT_CGI_DEFAULT
proc main(x)
...
It should show if hOut is using blocking IO or not.
BTW PIPEs without blocking IO are usually very hard to use so if they are
not blocking calling process in windows we should try to fix it.
It prints:
===
C:\c
Revision: 10928
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10928&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-04-24 11:45:55 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-04-24 13:42 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* bin/postinst.bat
+ Ad
Revision: 10927
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10927&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-04-24 11:26:59 + (Fri, 24 Apr 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-04-24 13:18 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* INSTALL
* Changed QT
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
Hi,
> is it possible to add below function ?
> hb_ProcessIsRunning( hProc, nTimeoutMsecs ) -> lIsRunning
> to check if a process started with hb_ProcessOpen() is currently running so
> I can have:
> PROC Main()
> LOCAL hOut
> LOCAL hProc
Hi,
Perhaps you can to define your index function in your harbour program,
example
FUNCTION IndexFunc()
RETURN ""
Function will return type mismatch real clipper function
Regards
Adam Lubszczyk escribió en mensaje <23210753.p...@talk.nabble.com>...
>
>Hi!
>
>Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>>
>>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Adam Lubszczyk wrote:
Hi,
> > Because Harbour checks if all index expressions (KEY/FOR) are valid when
> > index is open. It helps to detect problem immediately. IMHO it's much
> > better then later pseudo random RTE like in Clipper.
> Can I switch this feature (checks when _
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Alexander S.Kresin wrote:
Hi,
> for a few years I use for Harbour Linux console applications the gtcrs,
> but last time more and more new distributions goes with UTF8 coding and
> gtcrs doesn't show national characters ( possibly, ncursesw should be used
> instead of ncu
Hi All,
for a few years I use for Harbour Linux console applications the
gtcrs, but last time more and more new distributions goes with UTF8
coding and gtcrs doesn't show national characters ( possibly, ncursesw
should be used instead of ncurses, but this is other issue ).
Which gt can I
53 matches
Mail list logo
