On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:52:08AM +0200, gno wrote:
> > Let's fix our Lua packaging. And, can you send revised versions of
> > patches 2 and 3 from this series?
>
> Working on it. I might nag you with questions soon. The snippet is just a
> lazy copy-paste from awesome 3.4 since my knowledge isn'
On 8/30/2016 8:56 AM, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:09:33AM +0200, gno wrote:
Sure hope I'm doing this right as I'm new to this.
These patches add Awesome 3.5.9 to the repository. I decided against
updating since it may break peoples configurations. Awesome had API
changes in b
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:09:33AM +0200, gno wrote:
> Sure hope I'm doing this right as I'm new to this.
> These patches add Awesome 3.5.9 to the repository. I decided against
> updating since it may break peoples configurations. Awesome had API
> changes in between 3.4 and 3.5.
>
> Please have a
doncatnip writes:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:19 +
> ng0 wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I just don't really know what to say about this as my
> experience with hardening is rather non-existant. I can sure find out
> how to disable dbus and submit another patch.
No, this was not my intention. The pat
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:59:51 +
ng0 wrote:
> > Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9).
>
> ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version
> awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark)
> • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 (@)
> • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (r
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:19 +
ng0 wrote:
I'm sorry, I just don't really know what to say about this as my
experience with hardening is rather non-existant. I can sure find out
how to disable dbus and submit another patch.
> ng0 writes:
>
> >> Works for me (written from inside a running aw
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:50:29 +
ng0 wrote:
Hi !
Of course. I didn't notice.
> (Sending this back as a copy to the thread on the list.)
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you please CC the guix-devel@gnu.org list or just reply-to the
> list when replying with the intention to not message offlist?
>
> I think
(Sending this back as a copy to the thread on the list.)
Hi,
Can you please CC the guix-devel@gnu.org list or just reply-to the list
when replying with the intention to not message offlist?
I think gnu.org does not set a reply-to thing, my email client does not
care or know about such settings t
ng0 writes:
>> Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9).
>
> ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version
> awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark)
> • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 (@)
> • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2)
> • D-Bus support
> Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9).
ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version
awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark)
• Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 (@)
• Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2)
• D-Bus support: ✔
Having no dbus suppor
ng0 writes:
> Hi,
>
> gno writes:
>
>> Hi guix !
>>
>> Sure hope I'm doing this right as I'm new to this.
>> These patches add Awesome 3.5.9 to the repository. I decided against
>> updating since it may break peoples configurations. Awesome had API
>> changes in between 3.4 and 3.5.
>>
>> Please
Hi,
gno writes:
> Hi guix !
>
> Sure hope I'm doing this right as I'm new to this.
> These patches add Awesome 3.5.9 to the repository. I decided against
> updating since it may break peoples configurations. Awesome had API
> changes in between 3.4 and 3.5.
>
> Please have a look.
Awesome! Many
Hi guix !
Sure hope I'm doing this right as I'm new to this.
These patches add Awesome 3.5.9 to the repository. I decided against
updating since it may break peoples configurations. Awesome had API
changes in between 3.4 and 3.5.
Please have a look.From cd3175f242450169b269ead777be6c7835476fba Mo
13 matches
Mail list logo
