On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:59:51 +0000 ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> wrote:
> > Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9). > > ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version > awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark) > • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 (@) > • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2) > • D-Bus support: ✔ > > Having no dbus support will help with eventual hardening of Guix, > but why do we not have it in awesome? > And why would we we need it (dbus support) at all? I don't even know > why I used to build it with dbus support before. Works either way. Actually, personally I'd perefer keeping dbus support for notifications. Different variants would be nice. Something akin to gentoo make flags, no ?
