On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:19 +0000 ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> wrote:
I'm sorry, I just don't really know what to say about this as my experience with hardening is rather non-existant. I can sure find out how to disable dbus and submit another patch. > ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: > > >> Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9). > > > > ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version > > awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark) > > • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 > > (@) • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2) > > • D-Bus support: ✔ > > Great, the joy of a limited font... Nevermind this message then for > obvious reasons but rather take it as a note that dbus and hardening > is something we need to watch in the future ;) > > > Having no dbus support will help with eventual hardening of Guix, > > but why do we not have it in awesome? > > And why would we we need it (dbus support) at all? I don't even > > know why I used to build it with dbus support before. Works either > > way. >
