ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: >> Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9). > > ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version > awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark) > • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 (@) > • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2) > • D-Bus support: ✔
Great, the joy of a limited font... Nevermind this message then for obvious reasons but rather take it as a note that dbus and hardening is something we need to watch in the future ;) > Having no dbus support will help with eventual hardening of Guix, > but why do we not have it in awesome? > And why would we we need it (dbus support) at all? I don't even know why > I used to build it with dbus support before. Works either way. -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
