doncatnip <gno...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:19 +0000 > ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> wrote: > > I'm sorry, I just don't really know what to say about this as my > experience with hardening is rather non-existant. I can sure find out > how to disable dbus and submit another patch.
No, this was not my intention. The patch looks good to me. Now only someone with commit access needs to review, as I do not have commit access. >> ng0 <n...@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes: >> >> >> Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9). >> > >> > ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version >> > awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark) >> > • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3 >> > (@) • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2) >> > • D-Bus support: ✔ >> >> Great, the joy of a limited font... Nevermind this message then for >> obvious reasons but rather take it as a note that dbus and hardening >> is something we need to watch in the future ;) >> >> > Having no dbus support will help with eventual hardening of Guix, >> > but why do we not have it in awesome? >> > And why would we we need it (dbus support) at all? I don't even >> > know why I used to build it with dbus support before. Works either >> > way. >> > -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
