On 4/17/2014 11:59 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Hi Desiree,
As you may have noticed, the Mozilla blog never allows comments. I'm
pretty sure it never has. For conversations, we have dozens of
mailing-lists/newsgroups/forums that are better places, including this
one. And we suspect that D
On 4/17/14, 2:59 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
As you may have noticed, the Mozilla blog never allows comments. I'm
pretty sure it never has.
The Mozilla blog should just remove its comment section. That the
comment section exists but is (always) disabled causes confusion or
people to s
Hi Desiree,
As you may have noticed, the Mozilla blog never allows comments. I'm
pretty sure it never has. For conversations, we have dozens of
mailing-lists/newsgroups/forums that are better places, including this
one. And we suspect that Discourse would be an even better place.
Personally, I'd
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:33 PM, wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 7:49:36 PM UTC-6, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> > I think implementing a new system to address the recent situation is a
> >
> > waste of time and effort. Issues like this one are incredibly rare.
> >
> > And if you don't want to
On 4/15/2014 12:05 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
First, of any new members of the list are reading this, this is not at all
meant as a suggestion that you're not welcome here.
The governance list is the best place we have for discussing the current
issues, but it's really not a good place to engage t
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 7:49:36 PM UTC-6, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
> I think implementing a new system to address the recent situation is a
>
> waste of time and effort. Issues like this one are incredibly rare.
>
> And if you don't want to read the critical emails to governance it
>
> does
Nicholas,
At the level of the current situation, yes, this is rare, but it's not so
rare that things are going on where we should try to engage the general
public* outside of a support capacity.
* We probably have a better term for this. I mean people who aren't
identified Mozillians who might wa
El 16/04/14 00:05, Majken Connor escribió:
> It does occur to me that Discourse would be a very good tool for this,
> though I'd recommend a stand-alone instance from one we might use for
> team/community communications. An area of SUMO might work as well, though
> it would need to be a separate fo
I think implementing a new system to address the recent situation is a
waste of time and effort. Issues like this one are incredibly rare.
And if you don't want to read the critical emails to governance it
doesn't take long to skim over them.
Nick
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Majken Connor w
On 4/15/2014 6:05 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
1. Is easy for the public to use
Governance seemed very easy to use for a lot of folks.
I understand that it expanded it's original purpose.
But Mozilla is open right.
2. Allows existing communication channels to maintain their current
function (having
10 matches
Mail list logo
