On 4/15/2014 6:05 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
1. Is easy for the public to use
Governance seemed very easy to use for a lot of folks.
I understand that it expanded it's original purpose.
But Mozilla is open right.
2. Allows existing communication channels to maintain their current
function (having to deal with 100 threads about our CEO issues shifts the
governance list's effectiveness)
To most, I think it is a mysterious process, so random comments should
not be dismissed out of hand.
3. Allows us to create deditcated spaces to send people when we have "hot
button" issues
As long as dissent doesn't amount to throwing them into the bitbucket
4. Allows Mozillians and core contributors to engage with the public
A lot of energy would be required for this.
Given the general response to votes on Bugzilla,
how would this be different
The general consensus in the user community is that Meritocracy rules
and the everyday user is left with 'Take it or leave it'
This is not a personal complaint....Generally, I'll take it.
But when i get on a train, I generally want to be sure where it is going.
I rode that train in the 70's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvsAqkOhI48&feature=player_detailpage
I know this is not social media, but sometimes I need a song to help my
expressions.
So I'll take advantage of it while posting is loose here.
--
*JoeS*
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
