Having some issues installing from source

I'm having a hell of a time trying to compile and install gnupg from the source code on an ubuntu machine. I've posted a thread on AskUbuntu here http://askubuntu.com/questions/681041/trying-to-compile-gnupg-from-source if someone would be willing to lend a hand. Thanks, Josh _

Re: Seperate Session Key and Encrypted Data

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thursday 1 October 2015 at 4:08:13 PM, in , Koszta Dániel wrote: > However, I'm not sure of the security implications of > this. From the gpg manual: >> We think that Key Escrow is a Bad Thing The security implication of sharing the session

Re: How to get your first key signed

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:33 PM, MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote: > >> So you three will share the same reputation on the >> mailing list. > > No, their reputations and posting histories did not become merged. The word "will" does not infer history. You know by reputation I mea

Re: How to get your first key signed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Friday 2 October 2015 at 5:51:52 AM, in , Guan Xin wrote: > So you three will share the same reputation on the > mailing list. No, their reputations and posting histories did not become merged. > If at least one of you commit crimes with

Re: Having some issues installing from source

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > I'm having a hell of a time trying to compile and install gnupg > from the source code on an ubuntu machine. I've posted a thread on > AskUbuntu here > http://askubuntu.com/questions/681041/trying-to-compile-gnupg-from-sou rce >if > someone would

Re: AW: Seperate Session Key and Encrypted Data

On Fri 2015-10-02 02:39:07 -0400, Werner Koch wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:29, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: > >> So the only functionality GnuPG is missing to assemble the workflow >> you're describing would be a new GnuPG command named something like >> --generate-pkesk-with-session-key. If th

Re: AW: Seperate Session Key and Encrypted Data

On Fri 2015-10-02 04:10:16 -0400, Christian Loehle wrote: > Thanks for your reply(and all the others of course). Personally I'm > going to use non-pgp AES probably, although I'm not quite content with > that. AES is a cipher for a single block. For files larger than the block size, you'll need t

Re: AW: Seperate Session Key and Encrypted Data

On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 18:16, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: > Do you mean "more generalized" than generate-pkesk-with-session-key? Do > you have a spec for what you want this command to be? Can we open a - Add new PKESK packets to an encrypted message - Add new SKESK packets to an encrypted message

Re: How to get your first key signed

On 03/10/15 14:04, Guan Xin wrote: > What happened to being guilty once proven guilty until > proven innocent? > Your key is the proof. Please stop trolling. Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My k

Re: How to get your first key signed

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 03/10/15 14:04, Guan Xin wrote: >> What happened to being guilty once proven guilty until >> proven innocent? >> Your key is the proof. > > Please stop trolling. > > Peter. YOU who insist that digital signatures are no proof and worth noth

Re: How to get your first key signed

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 03/10/15 14:04, Guan Xin wrote: >> What happened to being guilty once proven guilty until >> proven innocent? >> Your key is the proof. > > Please stop trolling. > > Peter. "Please don't feed the troll" is an acceptable wording when said t

Re: How to get your first key signed

> IF YOU THINK DIGITAL SIGNATURES ARE NOTHING > THEN PLEASE KEEP AWAY FROM THIS MAILING LIST. A digital signature means surprisingly little. These are the conditions that must be met for a signature to be meaningful: it must be correct, issued from a validated[*] certificate, and belong to a trus

Re: How to get your first key signed

Please! For the 600th time! REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST! > On Oct 3, 2015, at 1:44 PM, Guan Xin wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Peter Lebbing >> wrote: >>> On 03/10/15 14:04, Guan Xin wrote: >>> What happened to being guilty once proven guilty until >>> proven innocent? >>>

Re: How to get your first key signed

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> IF YOU THINK DIGITAL SIGNATURES ARE NOTHING >> THEN PLEASE KEEP AWAY FROM THIS MAILING LIST. > > A digital signature means surprisingly little. It's a kind of weak proof in China, and is much more than nothing. I have absolutely no idea

Re: How to get your first key signed

> Please! For the 600th time! REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST! You have been told how to unsubscribe. Perhaps try following those instructions? To recap: visit this URL. http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users At the bottom you'll see text of, "To unsubscribe from Gnupg-users, ge

Re: How to get your first key signed

On 2015-10-03 at 20:23, Crissy Lynn wrote: > Please! For the 600th time! REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST! > If you knew how to subscribe, you should know how to unsubscribe, because: 1) If you told on this mailing list to be unsubscribed for the 600th time, then someone told you how to unsubscri

RE: How to get your first key signed

> Please! For the 600th time! REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST! Please for the 601st time, follow the directions you have been give before: List-Unsubscribe: , And while you are at it,

Re: How to get your first key signed

> So you three will share the same reputation on the mailing list. Probably not. But if so, I'm fine with that: John and John are good people. And the point we were making -- which was that people invest way too much trust into unvalidated keys and/or possibly untrustworthy people -- was importa