-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Thursday 1 October 2015 at 4:08:13 PM, in <mid:560d4c5d.5000...@gmail.com>, Koszta Dániel wrote: > However, I'm not sure of the security implications of > this. From the gpg manual: >> We think that Key Escrow is a Bad Thing The security implication of sharing the session key is a positive one: it can only compromise the one message. By contrast, divulging a private key would compromise all messages encrypted to that key, as well as allowing the party to whom the private key was divulged to make signatures with it. - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> My mind works like lightning... one brilliant flash and it's gone -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWD7foXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXw57oH/2ZojVdVudqJoVDeXgBx6qUd hehJRPK9MG8/0HowMT3YrlWowmVQmTpZy5GHmIRGDPhFTJCoc1qNPr/CDPLu+NNi +LNBrhaw2T9MCYlFyDpVjuX4kovYgoIAoZUhC1/B6jeno+6+fXP+hY5DjqCn1Tph oisSF5qnzgbWMpHaa1PPstqXPi3riFJt0TPV/4tp7bCDRpZrKhUc7QTW5twD8Lnz AaXJ/axQcsIkVI/QKdP9Uo7fHImE798m7BRUS7RIxrndMWWqIYDnAp8MPqbRZ2Zk koZXKa0Ul6C8DHbMacUATSH7qiJ0u5DB1XRAGUT1NLVi3O0DivXuXRjpKbCbSNeI vgQBFgoAZgUCVg+3+18UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45AO/AP9YUE+RBOv1fkU8NTWxyGlLOF6U P8EM8RMmOeCngEc2ZQEAjOVuTJpHBaysHzGIbiox5UaFQcMQJQILl3lR0TOqgw8= =qhK/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
