> So you three will share the same reputation on the mailing list. Probably not. But if so, I'm fine with that: John and John are good people. And the point we were making -- which was that people invest way too much trust into unvalidated keys and/or possibly untrustworthy people -- was important and worth making.
> If at least one of you commit crimes with your signed messages, > you will share the same legal liability... If I commit a crime and it gets traced back to the certificate we shared, then the authorities would have to figure out which of us was using the certificate. The idea that OpenPGP signatures are non-repudiable is a fashionable bit of nonsense: I am aware of no court, anywhere in the world, which has recognized OpenPGP signatures as being non-repudiable. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
