On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 10:14:58PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> ? That key has NO signatures other than yourself! There's no way anyone can
> trust it. There are NO paths.
>
It does, look at:
http://pks.aaiedu.hr:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x16DA1F1690887E13
http://pks.aaiedu.hr:11371/
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:12:01PM +0200, markus reichelt wrote:
>
> http://bitfalle.org/keys/gpg-key-signing-policy.php
>
I don't feel like reading the GNU documentation license, so a short
question: may I reuse and adapt this text to my own needs? [I'll give
you a proper credit]
>
> imagine y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:12:01PM +0200, markus reichelt wrote:
>
>>http://bitfalle.org/keys/gpg-key-signing-policy.php
>>
>
> I don't feel like reading the GNU documentation license, so a short
> question: may I reuse a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If you want a formalised external method of identity verification, consider
>> using x.509 and people like Thawte will provide an alternative to GnuPG's
>> personal (face-to-face) methods.
>>
> Actually, at one point in time I did think about getting myself a "real"
On Sunday 23 October 2005 8:15 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 10:14:58PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > ? That key has NO signatures other than yourself! There's no way anyone
> > can trust it. There are NO paths.
>
> It does, look at:
> http://pks.aaiedu.hr:11371/pks/looku
Albert Reiner wrote:
P.S.: A slightly less inflammatory tone would not have harmed either.
The tone of "How come King's bum is bare!?" was, no doubt,
considered inflammatory by the Court.
cdr
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:26:51PM +0200, B. Kuestner wrote:
> all: Joe Smith has no way of fixing the situation, even if he is
> legitimate owner of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail address.
>
> It strikes me, that GNU-supporters would bash MS (or for that reason
> any vendor of proprietary soft
On Sunday 23 October 2005 5:49 am, Alphax wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
> > The only solution to that is to get more
> > keysigning done.
>
> And to get more people using OpenPGP. Does anyone have a document called
> (eg.) "Why you should use OpenPGP" or similar? I've read the GNU Privacy
> Handbo
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:26:51PM +0200, B. Kuestner wrote:
>
>> all: Joe Smith has no way of fixing the situation, even if he is
>> legitimate owner of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail address.
>>
>> It strikes me, that GNU-supporters would bash MS (or for that reason
>> a
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 05:16:43PM +0100, Bob Henson wrote:
> > Some people do not like this server as it does email address
> > verification (via sending a mail to the email address on the key, if
> > any), and then signs the key. These signatures are reissued every 2
> > weeks or so if people k
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 05:16:43PM +0100, Bob Henson wrote:
>>That's not the only reason though. The PGP Global Keyserver is dangerous, as
>>well as a nuisance, for a number of reasons. As it only shows one key on a
>>search for a users name, it might cause people to miss a rev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Was Sun, 23 Oct 2005, at 13:27:05 -0400,
when David wrote:
> It always amuses me that people complain bitterly about the GD storing
> one key per email address, but don't complain, for example, about
> people putting their key up on a web
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:41:45PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 05:16:43PM +0100, Bob Henson wrote:
>
> >>That's not the only reason though. The PGP Global Keyserver is dangerous, as
> >>well as a nuisance, for a number of reasons. As it only shows one
Am I missing something?
The web of trust. (And the documentation, apparently.)
Okay. I got that by now. I think the problem was that MacGPG makes it
really easy to get started with GPG:
There's a plug-in that integrates nicely with Apple's Mail. And the
Keychain Assistant let's you
Am I missing something?
The web of trust. (And the documentation, apparently.)
Okay. I got that by now. I think the problem was that MacGPG makes it
really easy to get started with GPG:
There's a plug-in that integrates nicely with Apple's Mail. And the
Keychain Assistant let's
I suggest that you seriously check our Big Lumber at www.biglumber.com
Thanks John. I will.
Regarding my personal web of trust: I get a clearer picture now and
for starter I'll exchange keys directly with my friends.
As for the "unwanted keys" for my e-mail address. At least for now I
kn
16 matches
Mail list logo
