Am I missing something?


The web of trust.  (And the documentation, apparently.)


Okay. I got that by now. I think the problem was that MacGPG makes it really easy to get started with GPG:

There's a plug-in that integrates nicely with Apple's Mail. And the Keychain Assistant let's you do all the key creation and uploading things easily. That's great. That's a start to get people actually using GPG.

But then unlike the command line tools the software does not recommend to make a backup copy of your private key. It does not recommend to make a hard copy of your key. It does not recommend to create a revocation certificate. It also does not explain that downloading a public server means that this key can be trusted. That of course is a not so good start to get people actually using GPG.

In my case, there was also a bug: When I tried to delete a key I didn't want, up came a cryptic error message. So after a while since I had just been playing around after all, I thought I just delete my keychain and start from scratch. Did that twice actually for the same reason. And that's how I lost those private keys.

Anyway, regarding MacGPG, it's a great software even at 0.3.x. I can only commend the creators for the effort they have put into it so far. Now to prevent that others get bitten like I was I will suggest to the authors that they will build recommended practices into the software. So after creating a key it could prompt the user to export a copy, print a hard copy and create a revocation certificate. The deletion error could be fixed, and before deleting a key, the software could warn of the implications and advice to create a backup copy first somewhere else. Before uploading to a server it could explain the implications of that. And before downloading a key it could again explain some more of the meaning.


P.S.:  A slightly less inflammatory tone would not have harmed either.


You're absolutely right. It wasn't meant to be inflammatory, nor was I in an angry mood or something. I was trying to be straight-forward with my reasoning. But after rereading my post when it came back I bit my lip and felt offended by my own words. Ouch!

So, please, if somebody took offense at my post, it really was not meant like that. My apologies.

Björn





_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to