David Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 05:16:43PM +0100, Bob Henson wrote:
>>That's not the only reason though. The PGP Global Keyserver is dangerous, as >>well as a nuisance, for a number of reasons. As it only shows one key on a >>search for a users name, it might cause people to miss a revoked key and >>continue using it. > > > This is a misunderstanding about the Global Directory. It does not, > is not designed to, and should not give more than one key for a given > email address. He didn't say e-mail address, he said name. :) I just checked this for myself, and if I type in "Doug Barton" I get the key that is tied to this e-mail address, but not the other key that I have uploaded to that server. This actually explains a common complaint that I hear from PGP users about not being able to find that other key. So, this turns out to be very useful information, as I now know to tell them to search for my other key by e-mail address (which works, btw). I can see a lot of value in the model you described David, and I agree that at least having a key where the e-mail address has been verified, on a server where users actually have the ability to remove keys, is a good thing. On the other hand, I can see that every other "Doug Barton" in the world is at a significant disadvantage here, since I got there first. :) hth, Doug -- If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users