On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:26:51PM +0200, B. Kuestner wrote:

> all: Joe Smith has no way of fixing the situation, even if he is  
> legitimate owner of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail address.
> 
> It strikes me, that GNU-supporters would bash MS (or for that reason  
> any vendor of proprietary software) for dishing out once more a  
> thoughtless, immature and insecure software design.
> 
> I understand it must not be simple to revoke or disable keys. But it  
> shouldn't be impossible either, especially in the light of anybody's  
> capability to put public keys under my name on the server.
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> >It's an inherent scaling problem of the keyserver net.  I've
> >seen estimates that the majority of the keys on the keyserver net are
> >not used for one reason or another, but can't be deleted.  Even with
> >the garbage keys, the keyserver database isn't too large to be served
> >though.
> 
> Well, my issue is not so much with the keyservers. I guess with  
> faster and more hardware this scheme could be maintained for decades.
> 
> But if the keyservers are not directories to look up public keys,  
> then what are they? And if they are meant as directories, how good  
> are they if they are flooded with garbage keys.
> 
> >The PGP company is running a different sort of keyserver at
> >http://keyserver.pgp.com.  This type of keyserver allows you to remove
> >keys if you can prove (by answering an email challenge) that you have
> >access to the email address on the key.  This keyserver obviously does
> >not synchronize with the others, however.
> 
> Can gpg use this keyserver? It is listed in the settings of my MacPG.  

GPG can use this keyserver.  Just set:

  keyserver ldap://keyserver.pgp.com

in your gpg.conf file (or whatever GUI you happen to be using).

> Is using this server recommendable for everybody?

This is a harder question.  I would unhesitatingly recommend it for
beginning users.  It's also useful for any level user who wants to
simplify the whole key selection process - it guarantees there is only
one key per email address.  If you want to mail to a particular
address, there is no question which is the "right" key, as there is
only the one key there.

I believe it is also the default keyserver for PGP users.

Some people do not like this server as it does email address
verification (via sending a mail to the email address on the key, if
any), and then signs the key.  These signatures are reissued every 2
weeks or so if people keep requesting the key.  The list of signatures
can get long.  Both PGP and GPG have features to delete the expired
ones.

David

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to