On Friday, 1 November 2024 10:20:14 GMT Jakob Bohm via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Unless the speedo make target actively checks each download against a
> strong hash stored in the initial gnupg tarball
It does, actually.
More precisely, it checks each download against a strong hash stored in a
swdb.ls
On 10/29/2024 10:05 AM, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hi!
you should really set aside problems wit the distribution and use the
speedo variant to build eberthing. This is somewhat similar to an
AppImage. From the README:
To quickly build all required software without installing it, th
One minor correction: I'm not running systemd (there's a reason I run
Devuan!). But still, maybe there's a sysvinit thing that is doing a similar
operation, who knows.
Thanks for the response. I will have to read this more thoroughly.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 9:04 AM Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
Hi!
you should really set aside problems wit the distribution and use the
speedo variant to build eberthing. This is somewhat similar to an
AppImage. From the README:
To quickly build all required software without installing it, the
Speedo target may be used:
make -f build-aux/speedo.m
On Montag, 28. Oktober 2024 17:25:07 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Vincent
Cozzo via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I do have an update on this effort, though to make a long story short,
> "the code works and I don't know why."
>
> When I try to install gpg 2.5.1 "system-wide," the executables end up
> in /
Hey all,
I do have an update on this effort, though to make a long story short,
"the code works and I don't know why."
When I try to install gpg 2.5.1 "system-wide," the executables end up
in /usr/local/bin. This sounds fine and normal, but in this state, I
encounter two problems:
1. the prior er
Hello,
Vincent Cozzo wrote:
> So, the first `agent_genkey` call works just fine (`err` code is
> zero), but the subsequent agent_genkey returns `16777220`...
[...]
> So there is very possibly a problem with how I installed the new
> binary. In full disclosure, I tried to "compile" the GnuPG binari
mands@entry=0x0, quiet=quiet@entry=0,
seckey_check=seckey_check@entry=1) at ../../g10/keyedit.c:1801
#5 0x5556d543 in main (argc=, argv=) at ../../g10/gpg.c:4764
```
So, the first `agent_genkey` call works just fine (`err` code is
zero), but the subsequent agent_genkey returns `16777220`...
Anyway,
Hi!
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:50, Vincent Cozzo said:
> way to generate a Kyber public key is to add a _subkey_ to an existing
> ECC key (right?).
You can also do:
gpg -v --quick-gen-key --batch \
--passphrase='' pqc-test-20241...@example.org pqc
Which generates such a key:
sec brain
Hi GPG Users/Developers,
I am doing research on Post Quantum Cryptography, and I had a question
about the GPG 2.5.1 development release, since I read that it
allegedly features an implementation of Kyber.
>From analyzing the codebase (g10/keygen.c), it is clear that the only
way to generat
Hi Rafael,
Am Freitag 16 Juni 2023 19:50:43 schrieb Alberti, Rafael Ricardo via
Gnupg-users:
> On May 15 2023, we installed and were looking at using GPG a server.
which operating system and if you are running GNU/Linux, which distribution
are you using?
> We created the proper Public and Pri
Hi Gpg Developers
On May 15 2023, we installed and were looking at using GPG a server. We
created the proper Public and Private key and Pass Phrase. The decryption
and encryption was working well for a few weeks until on June 13, 2023 the
decryption failed.
Upon review, we received a "No
On Wed, 10 May 2023 14:43, Dim Xr said:
> I'm far from a security expert, that's why I needed a more
> higher level solution for this. But definitely I'll give it a shot.
Use DMCrypt under Linux or Veracrypt etc. Disk encryption is a
complicated matter and you definitley should have some experi
Thank you Werner.
You need to use a low level crypto library
> for that (e.g. Libgcrypt) and decide which algorithm, mode and
> additional information you use.
>
OK I'll check it out. Searching on the mailing list responses I
came across with Libgcrypt again, but I've read that it is quite
low-le
On Tue, 9 May 2023 17:48, Dim Xr said:
> same size? Is there any way to have FPE (Format Preserving Encryption) via
> GPGME?
No. GPGME uses the OpenPGP and S/MIME protocols (gpg and gpgsm) and is
not suitable for your task. You need to use a low level crypto library
for that (e.g. Libgcrypt) a
Hello all,
I'm currently working on a userspace block device driver. I want to add
encryption on it,
and that's how I came across GPGME.
My question is: is there a way to encrypt a plaintext and get a ciphertext
of **exactly** the
same size? Is there any way to have FPE (Format
On 2023-01-05 13:51, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2023 02:50:25 CET Jackson Chen via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > i had enabled KeePassXC secret service integration (some free desktop
> > standard). when i use my secret GPG/PGP keys, i get prompted by KeePassXC
> > to unlock the databa
On Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2023 02:50:25 CET Jackson Chen via Gnupg-users wrote:
> i had enabled KeePassXC secret service integration (some free desktop
> standard). when i use my secret GPG/PGP keys, i get prompted by KeePassXC
> to unlock the database (if locked). after unlocking the database, GPG
hi,
i had enabled KeePassXC secret service integration (some free desktop standard).
when i use my secret GPG/PGP keys, i get prompted by KeePassXC to unlock the
database (if locked). after unlocking the database, GPG goes back to asking for
the passphrase through pinentry.
the problem i have i
Thank you!
kcs
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:05 PM Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users <
gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
> K S via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > It would be helpful to know why I can't get compression in my build. I've
> > tried to build from source three times now.
> >
> > There are so many packag
K S via Gnupg-users wrote:
> It would be helpful to know why I can't get compression in my build. I've
> tried to build from source three times now.
>
> There are so many packages in Ubuntu with zip, zlib, and bzip2 in the name
> I can't begin to try them all. I've looked at config.log and it does
It would be helpful to know why I can't get compression in my build.
I've tried to build from source three times now.
The answer is very simple: because you are building it incorrectly. We
can provide you with the answers, but we can't give you the software
development skills needed to correc
It would be helpful to know why I can't get compression in my build. I've
tried to build from source three times now.
There are so many packages in Ubuntu with zip, zlib, and bzip2 in the name
I can't begin to try them all. I've looked at config.log and it doesn't
give much help.
Cheers
On Fri,
On Freitag, 11. November 2022 14:06:34 CET Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Freitag 04 November 2022 13:55:58 schrieb K S via Gnupg-users:
> > How do I run configure to get the compression routines?
>
> checkout the "config.log" or the output of your configure command run
> to see if there are messages
Hi Kevin,
Am Freitag 04 November 2022 13:55:58 schrieb K S via Gnupg-users:
> How do I run configure to get the compression routines?
checkout the "config.log" or the output of your configure command run
to see if there are messages concerning compression libraries.
> FYI, this is the first time
Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Question:
> > Why aren't those identical? I notice the source build has only
> > Uncompressed as an option.
> [...]
> > Is there something I missed in my build?
>
> configure most likely didn't find the development files of the
On Montag, 31. Oktober 2022 10:23:10 CET K S via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Question:
> Why aren't those identical? I notice the source build has only
> Uncompressed as an option.
[...]
> Is there something I missed in my build?
configure most likely didn't find the development fi
fine. But then
the question remains, suppose GPG asks for smartcard2 and smartcard2 is
stolen. I can only provide smartcard1 and GPG asks for smartcard2. What
to do?
2. Then some people suggest to use a different master key, but the goal
was that both smartcards back each other up, in case one is
Yes, will do that. And the full chain from start to finish with a test
key. Deal.
On 8/19/22 16:25, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2022, at 17:17, kho wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for this fast, complete and clear answer.
>>
>> I am going to see if I can still pick up somewhere or just remove all I
>
On 19 Aug 2022, at 17:17, kho wrote:
>
> Thanks for this fast, complete and clear answer.
>
> I am going to see if I can still pick up somewhere or just remove all I
> did and start all over by following your steps.
Just a note of caution: since it is quite an involved process I would recommend
Thanks for this fast, complete and clear answer.
I am going to see if I can still pick up somewhere or just remove all I
did and start all over by following your steps.
This is the confirmation I needed! Thanks!
On 8/19/22 15:25, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2022, at 13:48, kho via Gnupg-
Of course, you are right. I could store it digitally on a encrypted disk
and even on paper. And like you say they are not really gone. Thanks for
the tip.
On 8/19/22 15:21, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:48, kho said:
>
>> 4. Another approach is that I could for example have created j
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:48, kho said:
> 4. Another approach is that I could for example have created just 3
> subkeys (not 6) and copied all 3 to smartcard1 and again to smartcard2.
> I thought that having those subkeys separately is ideal, specially in a
> occasion were smartcard2 is stolen. Then
On 19 Aug 2022, at 13:48, kho via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> 5. What is at the end the best way to setup 2 smartcards that can be
> used in encryption, signing and decryption? And additionally both
> smartscard should work, I have 2 smartcards for redundancy.
If you want the two smartcards to be red
then
the question remains, suppose GPG asks for smartcard2 and smartcard2 is
stolen. I can only provide smartcard1 and GPG asks for smartcard2. What
to do?
2. Then some people suggest to use a different master key, but the goal
was that both smartcards back each other up, in case one is broke. So
On 6/11/2022 4:24 PM, Linus Virtanen via Gnupg-users wrote:
hii try to verify GPG signature of mutiple applications on windows but i
failed.a friend of mine tried and failed. He said that you do not need
verify GPG signature.He says it is waste of time. is it really necessary
to verify GPG signat
hii try to verify GPG signature of mutiple applications on windows but i
failed.a friend of mine tried and failed. He said that you do not need verify
GPG signature.He says it is waste of time. is it really necessary to verify GPG
signature?if it is necessary, would you tell me why?thank you.__
I've never been able to do this through graphical interfaces. I put all public
keys in a directory and use the command line:
gpg --import *asc
--
Stela dato:2.459.716,266 Loka tempo:2022-05-16 15:22:42 Lundo Mageia 8
-==-
Sendu mesaĝojn nur al homoj aŭ retlistoj kiuj vere povas interesiĝi
subkeys are generated
on the yubikey and then signed by the primary yubikey?
Also, unrelated question, but I could not find much information on this;
on the Yubico website, it says if you call generate on the smartcard
>When prompted, specify if you want to make an off-card backup of y
dear GnuPG users,
apologies if I'm asking something that is described in the documentation,
but i could not find it there.
Is there a way to sync your public search keys library in Kleopatra across
multiple PCs? For example by syncing the folder in which the keys are
stored? If so, which folder do
What's the difference between `|--personal-cipher-preferences' and
`default-preference-list'?|
The former is your preferences for the traffic you generate. The latter
is your advertised list of preferences that are affixed to new
certificates you generate.
E.g.: if you have p-c-p of CAMELLI
Hi all,
What's the difference between `|--personal-cipher-preferences' and
`default-preference-list'?|
|What ends up in the exported keys?
|
|
|
|Thanks!|
|- Mihai
|
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailm
Sorry for the formatting errors.
Regards,
- Mihai
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 2021-03-08 at 15:57 +, Call, Margaret wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> We would like to migrate our Symantec PGP to GNU PGP.. We tested the
> system last week with new PGP users and a user that migrated to GNU
> from Symantec. We have fixed all bugs except one:
>
> Our legacy Symantec users
Our legacy Symantec users (who have not yet transferred over to GNU) are
unable to decrypt/read GNU PGP emails.
Symantec is unfortunately not keeping current with the latest iterations
of the OpenPGP specification. Further, some features of current GnuPG
keys are not supported by Symantec PGP
On 3/9/2021 at 4:46 AM, "Margaret via Gnupg-users Call" wrote:
We would like to migrate our Symantec PGP to GNU PGP. We tested the
system last week with new PGP users and a user that migrated to GNU
from Symantec. We have fixed all bugs except one:
Our legacy Symantec u
Good morning,
We would like to migrate our Symantec PGP to GNU PGP. We tested the system
last week with new PGP users and a user that migrated to GNU from Symantec. We
have fixed all bugs except one:
Our legacy Symantec users (who have not yet transferred over to GNU) are unable
to decrypt/r
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:37, Erich Eckner said:
> What am I doing wrong? Or is there something special about this key?
Nothing. It is an interesting case. Let's have a look at key exported
without any options (listing slightly edited):
$ gpg --show-keys --with-sig-check c.pub
pub rsa4096
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I wanted to ask for help regarding this wkd-key-installation issue I had,
once more.
Whichever way I try, I always end up with an expired key being installed
into wkd, although the key file looks all-right to me:
$ gpg --show-keys --with-
Am 19.02.21 um 13:10 schrieb Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users:
> On 19/02/2021 11:06, michaelof--- via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> published a revocation cert for a very long used old 1024 bit key plus a
>> newly created 4096 bit key to http://keys.gnupg.net/. Visible after some
>> minute
On 19/02/2021 11:06, michaelof--- via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hi all,
published a revocation cert for a very long used old 1024 bit key plus a newly
created 4096 bit key to http://keys.gnupg.net/. Visible after some minutes.
Now, four days later, both keys are still not visible on e.g.
https://pgp.
Hi all,
published a revocation cert for a very long used old 1024 bit key plus a newly
created 4096 bit key to http://keys.gnupg.net/. Visible after some minutes.
Now, four days later, both keys are still not visible on e.g.
https://pgp.ocf.berkeley.edu
Is this usually taking that long, or is
-12-31]
$ gpg --show-keys < archlinux32.org/hu/z4eyw18p7a9p7c9owm78fj93mqkks6q3
pub rsa4096 2017-06-23 [SC] [expired: 2019-06-23]
2E29129B8C684FE7A959C422714A1770ECE2DF62
uid buildmaster
sub rsa4096 2017-06-23 [S] [expired: 2021-12-31]
Ah, yet another question: Th
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:44, Erich Eckner said:
> $GPG --export --export-filter keep-uid="mbox = $mbox" $fpr
gpg-wks-client does something similar but using "uid =" with a
pre-checked UID in an import filter. It also uses
import-options=import-export to process the keyblock without actually
import
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I'm using the following command to export keys for wkd:
$GPG --export --export-filter keep-uid="mbox = $mbox" $fpr
However, this creates funny results for the key for
buildmas...@archlinux32.org which is downloadable here:
https://archlinux
Hello,
the --verbose options gave me some more unusual information:
gpg: Schlüssel 22EEE0488086...F: Ungültige Eigenbeglaubigung für User-ID "[jpeg
image of size 7915]"
gpg: Schlüssel 22EEE0488086...F/CE7911B7FC04...F: Ungültige
Unterschlüssel-Anbindung
gpg: key 41E7044E1DBA...9: number of dropp
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 12:12, gnupgpacker said:
> How to identify / correct affected keys?
As usual add --verose to the gpg invocation. This might give some more
information.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Hello,
my attempt to verify all keys with GnuPG-2.2.25 shows this response:
$ gpg --refresh-keys
gpg: 59 Schlüssel werden per hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net aktualisiert
gpg: ...
gpg: signature packet: hashed data too long
gpg: read_block: read error: Ungültiges Paket
gpg: Anzahl insgesamt be
Hi,
attached is the (hopefully proper) key.
Regards
Stefan
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:44 PM Stakanov via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> I hope this is the correct list for this question:
>
>
>
> I tried to follow the instructions of
>
> https://www.mageia.org/it/downloads/get/
I hope this is the correct list for this question:
I tried to follow the instructions of
https://www.mageia.org/it/downloads/get/?q=Mageia-7.1-x86_64.iso[1]
were it says you can import the key to verify the iso.
But kleopatra stays without reaction (no matter how many pools I join) and
Am Dienstag 04 August 2020 18:17:56 schrieb Dmitry Alexandrov:
> it would be nice, if GPG were not interpreting locating an
> expired key as success, but continued with the next method instead:
This is related to
https://dev.gnupg.org/T5028
(gpg --locate-key should refetch via wkd, if configu
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 07:38, Dmitry Alexandrov said:
>> I dunno why @w...@gnupg.org did that
>
> I have a post-it on my CA laptop to add a signing subkey to my new key, I
> should really do that soon.
Maybe, you would like to update an expired key in DNS as wel
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 07:38, Dmitry Alexandrov said:
> I dunno why @w...@gnupg.org did that, but whatever his reasons were, the
> fact that he was _able_ to do that, is exactly the key reason why
I have a post-it on my CA laptop to add a signing subkey to my new key,
I should really do that soon.
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Sonntag, 2. August 2020 06:38:21 CEST Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>>
>> $ wget -qO - "$(/usr/lib/gnupg/gpg-wks-client --print-wkd-url
>> w...@gnupg.org)" | gpg --with-colons
>> gpg: WARNING: no command supplied. Trying to guess what you mean ...
>> pub:-:256:
Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> Stefan Claas wrote:
> > One more question, I tried to verify Werner's signature, from postings here
> > on the ML, but his signature could not be
> > verified, due to a missing pub key (0xFF80AE9D1DEC358D). But when looking
> >
On Sonntag, 2. August 2020 06:38:21 CEST Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> $ wget -qO - "$(/usr/lib/gnupg/gpg-wks-client --print-wkd-url
> w...@gnupg.org)" | gpg --with-colons gpg: WARNING: no command supplied.
> Trying to guess what you mean ...
> pub:-:256:22:63113AE866587D0A:1538149415:180139320
Stefan Claas wrote:
> One more question, I tried to verify Werner's signature, from postings here
> on the ML, but his signature could not be verified, due to a missing pub key
> (0xFF80AE9D1DEC358D). But when looking at Wiktor's WKD checker a key is
> present, but with a
re by enabling the --auto-key-retrieve option (please read the
> > note about the “web bug” in gpg’s man page before doing so—that option
> > is disabled by default for a reason.)
>
> I enabled it now and it works. :-)
One more question, I tried to verify Werner's signature, fro
* Johan Wevers:
> Do you have examples of this for security related subjects?
I try not to rely on Wikipedia, in particular when searching for
sensitive subjects. Besides, if that was unclear, I mentioned Wikipedia
as a general example of the good concept of a Wiki colliding with
humanity, not fo
On 28-07-2020 14:42, Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users wrote:
> confused with facts. The amount of BS that can be found on Wikipedia is
> case in point.
Do you have examples of this for security related subjects? I know there
are issues with politically sensitive subjects but that has usually
other
* Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users:
> How about collective and cooperative effort in a wiki, or cloud
> funding pledges or donations? Those who contribute (money or effort)
> get privilege of some kind.
>From what I observed over the years, a majority of Wikis only really
work within closely knit
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
For testing my new Nitrokey I have just install Enigmail for
Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system and when clicking on
a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up
WKD Thunderbird/Enigmail can not fetch the pub key. :-(
Damien Goutte-Gattat wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> >For testing my new Nitrokey I have just install Enigmail for
> >Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system and when clicking on
> >a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up
> >WKD Thunderbird/
Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> Stefan Claas wrote:
> > Enigmail for Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system
> > when clicking on a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up
> > WKD Thunderbird/Enigmail can not fetch the pub
> > key. :-(
>
> Unfortunately, ‘can not’ is not very informati
Stefan Claas wrote:
> Enigmail for Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system
> when clicking on a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up
> WKD Thunderbird/Enigmail can not fetch the pub key. :-(
Unfortunately, ‘can not’ is not very informative description. Does it return
any error?
Hi all,
I must admit I am a bit out of the loop when it comes to GnuPG
configuration.
For testing my new Nitrokey I have just install Enigmail for
Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system and when clicking on
a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up
WKD Thunderbird/Enigmail can not f
Sorry for seeming to be "spreading unjustified accusations". What I said
was meant to encourage that sort of "benign tyranny", I was not
complaining; or at least that was not my intention.
Thank you for explaining how the list works.
Ayoub
On 7/27/2020 2:08 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Su
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:30, Semih Ozlem said:
> when I run the command
>
> gpg --verify SHAxSUM.sign SHAxSUM
>
> I get the following message
>
> gpgv: unknown type of key resource 'trustedkeys.kbx'
As you can see by the error message ("gpgv:...") you invoked the gpgv
tool and not the gpg tool as y
On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:59, Ayoub Misherghi said:
> The moderators on this list (I do not know who they are) have been
> tyrannical excluding some of my posts; I am not bitter or resentful. I
This mailing list is not moderated and thus your post are not excluded
by any moderated. The only automat
Hi
I am trying to follow the directions on the page
https://www.debian.org/CD/verify
for verifying authenticity of CDs (meaning the iso files downloaded from
debian's page). The page has iso files then SHAxSUM files and SHAxSUM.sign
files.
I have already run sha512sum command to verify the iso fi
I understand it can be frustrating, especially if nobody has a deciding
vote or Vito power or moderator power. Someone should have have veto
power and anybody with other ideas can always fork and do his own thing.
That way it may probably work. A tyrant can stay on course and others
fork and
> How about collective and cooperative effort in a wiki, or cloud funding
> pledges or donations? Those who contribute (money or effort) get
> privilege of some kind.
I am very pessimistic about the idea of collective effort. What
experience has taught me from working on the FAQ is that a small n
How about collective and cooperative effort in a wiki, or cloud funding
pledges or donations? Those who contribute (money or effort) get
privilege of some kind.
On 7/26/2020 2:48 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 12/07/2020 20:01, Ayoub Misherghi wrote:
Can you please suggest some good tutorial
On 12/07/2020 20:01, Ayoub Misherghi wrote:
> Can you please suggest some good tutorial and reference material
> preferably free (probably mutually exclusive requirements) that will
> bring me up to your level or close to it please.
No, I think the available documentation is lacking in quality. An
It is working now. The problem was in gpg-agent.conf that I
forgot about. I did not do a re-install.
I learned from this list. Thanks.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/l
Sorry for splitting Peter and Philihp into two threads.
I have probably put my gpg environment/program in a state it
cannot come out of. I want to do what cowards do. I want to
uninstall gpg and start all over again, escaping from the mess I
I am re-sending this text only. I made the mistake of sending it html
previously.
Sorry for splitting Peter and Philihp into two threads.
I have probably put my gpg environment/program in a state it cannot come
out of. I want to do
Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> Peter Lebbing wrote:
> > You can actually unlock keys the way GnuPG intends to do that with:
> >
> > $ my-unlocker | /usr/lib/gnupg/gpg-preset-passphrase --preset
> >
> > You can find the keygrip for your keys with:
> >
> > $ gpg --with-keygrip --list-secret-keys
> >
>
Hi,
On 7/11/2020 3:34 AM, Peter Lebbing
wrote:
Hi!
On 10/07/2020 23:47, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users wrote:
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg --list-secret-keys
Could you do
$ gpg --with-subkey-fingerprint --list-secret-
Sorry for going off list and messing everybody up. Now I disserve
punishment. Sorry for the html too.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Newbie question.
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:07:17 -0700
From: Ayoub Misherghi
To: Peter Lebbing
On 7/11/2020 11:30 AM
Thanks. This exposes to me how little I know and it will take me time to
absorb it. None of this information is in anything I read. Nothing comes
close. I will not come to grips with it with the kind of reading
material I have. Can you please suggest some good tutorial and reference
material
Peter Lebbing wrote:
> You can actually unlock keys the way GnuPG intends to do that with:
>
> $ my-unlocker | /usr/lib/gnupg/gpg-preset-passphrase --preset
>
> You can find the keygrip for your keys with:
>
> $ gpg --with-keygrip --list-secret-keys
>
> You do need it for every subkey you want to
On 12/07/2020 17:45, Ayoub Misherghi wrote:
> Sorry for going off list and messing everybody up. Now I disserve
> punishment.
Heh :-). It's just that if I reply off-list, it only helps you, but if
it is on-list, other people can find it in a search engine when they're
facing something similar.
On
Hi,
On 11/07/2020 19:58, Ayoub Misherghi wrote:
> ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/sentry/trunk$ cat ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
> batch
> pinentry-mode loopback
Ah yes. Those two options have no place in your gpg.conf. They are
options that you might want to specify as part of the command line on
occasion, but unless you
Hi!
On 10/07/2020 23:47, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users wrote:
> ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg --list-secret-keys
Could you do
$ gpg --with-subkey-fingerprint --list-secret-keys
and
$ gpg --version
please?
And do you get a popup asking for your passphrase or is what you post
all the interac
What am I doing wrong:
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -r develop1 -o textfile.gpg -e
textfile
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls
textfile textfile.gpg
ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -u develop1 -o textfile.d
Question,
Is there anything out there, think bittorrent-sync, that allows for syncing
your full keyring between devices? Would it be enough to simply use
bittorrent-sync to sync your .gnupg folder?
I get the —export / —import but what about automating it a lil’ bit? Something
peer to peer
Exmos. Senhores,
Recebemos a informação que tiveram hoje a amabilidade de nos transmitir e que
muito agradecemos.
Vamos imediatamente analisar o caso e responderemos com a máxima brevidade
possível ao vosso pedido. Assim que for possível, o Serviço de Apoio ao Cliente
entrará em contacto convo
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:19, Brian Minton said:
> My guess is, the gpg one also is doing MDC, so you'd have to add the
> equivalent HMAC code to openssl, but that's just a complete guess.
The OpenPGP MDC is a SHA-1 hash appended to the plaintext and then
encrypted along with the data. The usual
On 10/27/19 3:25 PM, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> gpg --symmetric --cipher-algo AES256 hw.txt gives me a file
> size of 87 Bytes.
>
> Doing the same with openssl, for example:
>
> openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -pbkdf2 -in hw.txt -out hw.enc
>
> results in 32 Bytes.
>
> Can you please, or somebo
1 - 100 of 1002 matches
Mail list logo
