Werner Koch via Gnupg-users <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 07:38, Dmitry Alexandrov said: >> I dunno why @w...@gnupg.org did that > > I have a post-it on my CA laptop to add a signing subkey to my new key, I > should really do that soon.
Maybe, you would like to update an expired key in DNS as well?
By the way, it would be nice, if GPG were not interpreting locating an expired
key as success, but continued with the next method instead:
$$ gpg --auto-key-locate dane,wkd --locate-key w...@gnupg.org
gpg: key F2AD85AC1E42B367: public key "Werner Koch <w...@gnupg.org>"
imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1
pub dsa2048 2007-12-31 [SC] [expired: 2018-12-31]
80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367
uid [ expired] Werner Koch <w...@gnupg.org>
>> BTW, does anyone remember, how to command gpg(1) to print the above in a
>> human-readable format? There was some incantation, IIRC, but GPGʼs
>
> gpg --locate-external-key -v f...@example.rog
>
> looks up f...@example.org even if a key with that user id already exists.
No, thanks, thatʼs not what I forgot, I was nonplussed by the fact, that
--with-subkey-fingerprint has no any effect when --show-key is implied, while
--with-colons has [<eeop6k9l....@gnui.org>].
@kloec...@kde.org had resolved [<1803396.a0EWGg1j7a@breq>] my confusion already.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
