On 28/09/2011 07:46 AM, Bolin qu wrote:
> Hello,my friend:
>
> How are you recently? i hope everything is very well with you now.
> This is your friend_bolin worked in 3G T-smart communications factory as a
> sales man and tooling manager, Our company has many years experience in
> providing the
It is no longer shown but it is available at
ftp.gnupg.org/gnupg/binaries or something of the sort. Copy one of the
link locations that link to the source code and modify that path in the
location bar. It is inconvenient no doubt but it works.
I hope there will be updates to the 1.x branch because
I was wondering something similar. I have a few keys which I have
invalidated and disabled but there is no way to delete them. I am using
this new key which I have not uploaded because if something happens and
I must re-create the key that will too become just clutter on the server.
On 22/08/2011
You must have missed my enquiry from some time in July. I was looking
for it as well only to copy the link location of one of the FTP links
and do some self-searching. It would be useful if they announce 1.x.x
upgrades so people will not have to randomly decide when to check the
directory for an up
I strongly suggest Ultimate ZIP Cracker at vdgsoftware.com/uzc.html if I
recall correctly. It is undoubtedly the most complete and promising
software I have ever used and trust me when I say I have used many of
the kind. Beware that it is resource intensive if you configure it as such.
On 14/08/20
Will the
On 04/08/2011 05:32 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 09:16, Werner Koch wrote:
>> * Support the SSH confirm flag and show SSH fingerprints in ssh
>> related pinentries.
>
> First, congratulations on the new release. I've got it up and running on
> FreeBSD, hope to have the port upd
ansen wrote:
> On 7/19/11 5:24 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> Can somebody please link to or refer me to the site that
>> contains the latest version 1 of GnuPG? Thanks.
>
> ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.11.exe
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
> __
Six days ago I received my machine from repair. I am now running Windows
7 Ultimate and am ready to get back into the Enigmail scene after
settling in with Firefox and Thunderbird. However, when I navigated to
the download page on GnuPG.org the familiar table was not there. Where
did the GnuPG
Version 1.4.11 is still the latest of that branch, right? That is what
the download page says but some times there are later versions than what
is reported. Media Player Classic is a good example of this.
On 17/04/2011 09:32 PM, Faramir wrote:
> El 17-04-2011 22:18, Jonathan Ely escribió:
&g
Which one of these is the most keyboard accessible and compatible with
Windows XP?
On 17/04/2011 09:28 PM, Faramir wrote:
> El 17-04-2011 21:45, Felipe Alvarez escribió:
>> I've currently begun getting everyone in the office using GnuPG on
>> windows. We're using WinPT as the front end. However th
So their is an installer for Windows for version 2.x? I never found one
accept for that of GPG4WIN.
On 17/04/2011 09:08 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/17/2011 18:00, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> The only thing I use is the Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird
>> which works wel
The only thing I use is the Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird
which works well enough for me, but of course I must use the version 1
branch of GnuPG.
On 17/04/2011 08:57 PM, Felipe Alvarez wrote:
>> Have you ever thought about GPG4WIN?
> Looks a bit 'heavy' (fancy GUI and a bunch of progr
Have you ever thought about GPG4WIN? It is not accessible for me since I
use a screen reader and because of that I think the graphical user
interface needs some serious work, but I hear it works well for others.
On 17/04/2011 08:45 PM, Felipe Alvarez wrote:
> I've currently begun getting everyone
I did not understand what that menat anyway. I never click links that
seem anonymous so I am safe, but that was unusual.
On 31/03/2011 08:41 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 3/31/11 7:25 PM, Jerry wrote:
>> Dumping [something] would have been my first choice.
>
> Let's be a little careful about o
The first spammer I have seen thus far. Did not know they existed here.
On 31/03/2011 10:27 AM, Lee Elcocks wrote:
> hi it's in your best interests to start this right away http://bit.ly/gntBne
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
since I have been subscribed. Anything else you would like to
point out? I apologise if I come off mean in any way.
On 23/03/2011 04:55 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 March 2011, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> Enigmail allows only 1024, 2048 and 4096. I have never heard of that,
>> b
What is ECC? Now I want that haha.
On 22/03/2011 06:53 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 06:06 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> I really wish 8192 would become available. Not that it would be the end
>> all/be all of key security but according to your theory it sounds much
>&
I really wish 8192 would become available. Not that it would be the end
all/be all of key security but according to your theory it sounds much
more difficult to crack.
On 22/03/2011 05:14 PM, Mike Acker wrote:
> with chip makers playing with chips having 64 cores printed in silicon...
>
> somepla
Enigmail allows only 1024, 2048 and 4096. I have never heard of that,
but even still I would personally choose the largest key for the time
being till RSA becomes obsolete. Is there anything larger than 4096
since you mentioned values unknown to me?
On 22/03/2011 05:17 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
Would not it be 4096 with RSA, or is DSA in conjunction with a 4096 bit
key still popular? I have never used DSA so does what Robert said
pertaining to my used combination apply here?
On 22/03/2011 12:13 PM, Jerome Baum wrote:
> "Robert J. Hansen" writes:
>
>> And this is where I part ways with
published just this past 02 February I would.
On 22/03/2011 10:19 AM, lists.gn...@mephisto.fastmail.net wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:36:57PM -0400 Also sprach Robert J. Hansen:
>> On 3/19/11 10:34 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>>
>>> but be sure to set your preferences and
0/2011 05:16 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
>> using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
>> for me.
>>
>
> Ingo's talking about the body of the message. Most mailin
Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of
using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way
for me.
On 20/03/2011 04:44 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> On 20/03/2011 03:35 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Enigmail or GnuPG, correct?
PS. I learnt my lesson about including any signature for a mailing list.
On 20/03/2011 03:35 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 21/03/11 6:11 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>> Firstly, what is MUA? I hear that but am not sure what that means.
>
> MUA = Mail User Agent, e
.
On 20/03/2011 02:38 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 21/03/11 5:11 AM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
>>
>> The attached .asc file causes problems? I have disabled that but
>> still enabled the header. Why would the .asc attachment option be
>> there if it causes problems?
&g
The attached .asc file causes problems? I have disabled that but still
enabled the header. Why would the .asc attachment option be there if it
causes problems?
On 20/03/2011 01:28 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
>> Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/20/11
I removed the text signature in the account options just to be sure.
Hopefully this avoids complications. Is it because I use MIME?
On 20/03/2011 11:43 AM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote:
>> Jonathan Ely wrote the following on 3/20/11 8:57 AM:
>&g
It seems no matter which key server I try I encounter the alert saying
nothing can be found. This is very annoying. Does anybody know what the
problem is and how I can fix it? I can not seem to find a list of key
servers online. All I want to do is search for one's public key and
import it but I ca
Hahahaha, the RSA versus DSA is a question I asked earlier this week I
believe. You might wish to rummage through the archives for that short
conversation. I would use RSA due to its ridiculous amount of sscrutiny
over the years, but be sure to set your preferences and choose a 4096
over 2048. Doin
I think I made the mistake of using HTML format the first time then
learnt my signature failed to validate. I realised it was because of the
HTML check box being checked; thus, I have disabled that. I have also
disabled the text signature for replies.
On 14/03/2011 02:24 AM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
I use a screen reader called JAWS For Windows. The GUI is not screen
reader accessible, meaning I can not use the Arrow keys, Tab, Shift+Tab
and any other navigational keys to use the GPA utility like you can with
the mouse. I really hate that; people have no idea how much it annoys
me. I might wri
I apologise in advance if this is a stupid question to ask now or if
people already asked it before I stepped on the scene, but which
algorithm is more secure: DSA and EL GAMAL or RSA? I know the latter has
undergone a ridiculous amount of scrutiny and is immensely popular. I
also know it generates
Hello. I use Enigmail, so of course I have GnuPG installed. I use 1.4.9
because [1] I can not find an executable for 2.0.17 for Windows, and [2]
I do not know how to configure the GPG-agent. Can somebody please assist
me with upgrading to 2.0.17 and configuring the agent? For about a week
I have be
33 matches
Mail list logo
