Would not it be 4096 with RSA, or is DSA in conjunction with a 4096 bit key still popular? I have never used DSA so does what Robert said pertaining to my used combination apply here?
On 22/03/2011 12:13 PM, Jerome Baum wrote: > "Robert J. Hansen" <r...@sixdemonbag.org> writes: > >> And this is where I part ways with you. There is no reason not to bump >> key length up to 4096. There is also no reason not to use SHA512 with a >> DSA-1k key, for instance. Sure, only 160 bits of SHA512 will be used, but >> that's not a reason not to use it. It's not as if you're making the system >> weaker. > > Correct me if I'm wrong on this one, but it does make your key weaker, > right? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
