Dear Pawan,
a general introduction on how translation work is done in gnucash can be
found in the file doc/TRANSLATION_HOWTO, online at
http://gnucash.org/trans/TRANSLATION_HOWTO .
In order to use the gnome2-branch of development, you would need to
checkout the branch "gnucash-gnome2-dev" fr
As i have already stated that i am working on translation of gnucash
interface in nepali i would like to test your build of G2 how can i get
the build and see the translation coming up...
please advice and thanks for all your help
pawanOn 10/10/05, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Sho
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't given this a lot of thought, but don't you *need* both
> storage schema concurrently in order to provide forward compatibility?
> I.e. read using old schema, convert, write using new schema.
Not necessarily.. It all depends on what the stor
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:09:16PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>> On Sunday 02 October 2005 7:42 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
>> > I don't believe that it relates to
>> > the G2 port at all.
>>
>> I agree none of the QOF stuff is related to the GUI port to G
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right. I thought that the "larger-than-a-bug-fix" work was basically
> compensating for obsolete dependencies. I agree about
> register-rewrite. Could you explain what you consider to be
> QOF-pullout? I mean, how much QOF work is needed to get a
>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:59:35PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:42 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> >>(Assuming budgets are in 2.0, which I don't think they should be...) I'd
> >>be fine if both FreqSpec and Recurrence are in the code a
On 10/7/2005 1:47 PM, I believe that Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:36:59AM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
Nevertheless, I've been sitting on a stable, complete implementation
of budgeting since the spring, (I actually
Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:42 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
(Assuming budgets are in 2.0, which I don't think they should be...) I'd
be fine if both FreqSpec and Recurrence are in the code at the commit,
and frankly even at the release. Ideally, though, the conce
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think it should be committed, disabled (maybe debug-enabled), and
picked up after G2/2.0.
I'm fine with this. I'll provide instructions for those brave testers
to re-enable in the alpha releases.
My personal feeling is that if the code is there
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:57 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Well, it meets my needs. I guess we won't know if it meets other's
> needs until they try it and tell us.
What's in the tree now is incomplete, and needs to be at least disabled
if not removed.
It's hard to believe that your implmentati
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:42 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> (Assuming budgets are in 2.0, which I don't think they should be...) I'd
> be fine if both FreqSpec and Recurrence are in the code at the commit,
> and frankly even at the release. Ideally, though, the concepts merge
> ASAP, and certainly not p
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:57 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Well, it meets my needs. I guess we won't know if it meets other's
> > needs until they try it and tell us.
>
> What's in the tree now is incomplete, and needs to be at least
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:56:07PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:36:59AM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
> >
> >>If what's in the tree is broken and needs to be pulled, and you're
> >>sitting on a "stable complete implementati
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 13:47 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Even though budgeting wasn't a 1.8 feature?
Yes. G2 is not a one for one match up with 1.8. I changed a bunch of
the stock related code in HEAD before the g2 branch split off, so all
those changes will all be in the next release. Li
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:36:59AM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Nevertheless, I've been sitting on a stable, complete implementation
> of budgeting since the spring, (I actually use it for m
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:36:59AM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > Nevertheless, I've been sitting on a stable, complete implementation
> > of budgeting since the spring, (I actually use it for my own
> > budgeting.) along with lots of
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Nevertheless, I've been sitting on a stable, complete implementation
> of budgeting since the spring, (I actually use it for my own
> budgeting.) along with lots of other general improvements to
> e.g. tracing, testing, debugging, etc. A
[...]
>
> I've been meaning to set up a website for my current progress, but
> it's never been the most urgent thing. If you think you might be
> interested in helping, it would be more urgent.
Well... I'll have a rush in the next weeks in my job, so I'm not sure
how much time I will be able (or
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:03 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> | What's the definition for the system fmin() function?
>
> It is exactly the same, double fmin( double, double ); but I didn't feel
> like makeing a configure time check
Interesting. I have this function on my FC3 system as well. D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Hampton wrote:
| On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 13:20 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
|
|>| I was thinking more along the lines of an "#ifndef DARWIN" around the
|>| goffice definition of fmin(). Is there some #define that's only set
|>| during the mac bui
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 13:20 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> | I was thinking more along the lines of an "#ifndef DARWIN" around the
> | goffice definition of fmin(). Is there some #define that's only set
> | during the mac build?
>
> #if defined(__APPLE__) && defined(__MACH__)
>
> but I dislike i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Hampton wrote:
| On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:03 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
|
|>It is exactly the same, double fmin( double, double ); but I didn't feel
|>like makeing a configure time check
|
|
| I was thinking more along the lines of an "#if
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:03 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> It is exactly the same, double fmin( double, double ); but I didn't feel
> like makeing a configure time check
I was thinking more along the lines of an "#ifndef DARWIN" around the
goffice definition of fmin(). Is there some #define t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Hampton wrote:
| On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 01:21 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
|
|
|>~ static double
|>- -fmin (double a, double b)
|>+gog_fmin (double a, double b)
| What's the definition for the system fmin() function?
It is exactly the same, dou
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:12:21AM +0200, Didier Vidal wrote:
> [...]
> > Since then, I've also made substantial progress on a
> > register-rewrite using the GtkTreeModel API. It's been easier than I
> > thought. (Although I've made no progress in the past 2 months - no
> > time.)
> >
> C
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 01:21 +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> ~ static double
> - -fmin (double a, double b)
> +gog_fmin (double a, double b)
>
> I built using gcc-4.0 and --disable-error-on-warning and this was the only
> place I saw an actual error. I've got a system fmin and gcc-4.0 complains
> a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
| If you look at configure.in, you'll see a god awful hack to change the
| value
| of archive_cmds on darwin after libtool is generated. I put the hack in
| there in preference to changing lots and lots of Makefile.am's. If you w
[...]
> Since then, I've also made substantial progress on a
> register-rewrite using the GtkTreeModel API. It's been easier than I
> thought. (Although I've made no progress in the past 2 months - no
> time.)
>
Chris,
I'd be curious to see how this register implementation works.
There a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
| There are also architectural changes to the makefiles for libraries that use
| -module for G2 to work on Mac OSX. Those warnings that we all see about
| linking executables against ... library not beng portable - those warnings
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:03:21PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 02 October 2005 8:17 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > > I agree none of the QOF stuff is related to the GUI port to Gtk2 but it
> > > is all related to the underlying port to glib-2.
> > >
> > > The original desire for a G2 po
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:58:47PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 02 October 2005 7:46 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > > | Now I understand any such policy is merely an ideal whose
> > > | actual application must also consider many practicalities.
> > >
> > > One of which is spinnin
On Sunday 02 October 2005 8:17 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > I agree none of the QOF stuff is related to the GUI port to Gtk2 but it
> > is all related to the underlying port to glib-2.
> >
> > The original desire for a G2 port, in my understanding, was to port
> > gnucash to the gnome2 libraries,
On Sunday 02 October 2005 7:46 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > | Now I understand any such policy is merely an ideal whose
> > | actual application must also consider many practicalities.
> >
> > One of which is spinning out QOF.
>
> Care to explain that? I was more thinking about practical
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:09:16PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 02 October 2005 7:42 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> > I don't believe that it relates to
> > the G2 port at all.
>
> I agree none of the QOF stuff is related to the GUI port to Gtk2 but it is
> all
> related to the underlying po
On Sunday 02 October 2005 7:42 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 14:28 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Gnucash currently depends on a copy of QOF which was birthed inside
> gnucash itself.
Yes, originally it was QOF 0.5.0 and is now close to 0.6.0. The remaining
differences are:
qofba
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 02:42:54PM -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 14:28 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Right. I thought that the "larger-than-a-bug-fix" work was basically
> > compensating for obsolete dependencies. I agree about
> > register-rewrite. Could you explain what yo
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 09:17:46AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> | I'm hoping someone can clarify for me a confusion about the
> | state of the G2 branch. My understanding was basically that G2 was
> | feature-fr
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 14:28 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Right. I thought that the "larger-than-a-bug-fix" work was basically
> compensating for obsolete dependencies. I agree about
> register-rewrite. Could you explain what you consider to be
> QOF-pullout? I mean, how much QOF work is neede
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 01:08:37PM -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > I'm hoping someone can clarify for me a confusion about the
> > state of the G2 branch. My understanding was basically that G2 was
> > feature-frozen like an "rc" kern
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> I'm hoping someone can clarify for me a confusion about the
> state of the G2 branch. My understanding was basically that G2 was
> feature-frozen like an "rc" kernel - "get what's there working" -
> "bug-fixes only" - whatever you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
| I'm hoping someone can clarify for me a confusion about the
| state of the G2 branch. My understanding was basically that G2 was
| feature-frozen like an "rc" kernel - "get what's there working" -
| "bug-fixes only" -
Hey folks,
I'm hoping someone can clarify for me a confusion about the
state of the G2 branch. My understanding was basically that G2 was
feature-frozen like an "rc" kernel - "get what's there working" -
"bug-fixes only" - whatever you want to call it.
Now I understand any such p
42 matches
Mail list logo
