On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > I'm hoping someone can clarify for me a confusion about the > state of the G2 branch. My understanding was basically that G2 was > feature-frozen like an "rc" kernel - "get what's there working" - > "bug-fixes only" - whatever you want to call it.
That's more or less my understanding, but it's an informal one, true. The goal is strictly and specifically to get gnucash working with as-close-to-feature parity with 1.8 under gtk/gnome2. That's taken some interesting twists (gog, gconf), but those are basically in support of the above. We need to get to a G2-supporting release as quickly as possible. > patches a LONG time ago (my fault). If G2 is a "bug-fix-only" branch, > then it shouldn't slow me down so much to keep my patches fresh > against G2. Well, with respect to the scope of commits, it's not exactly a "bug-fix-only" branch, but it's not a "dev" branch either. There's some larger-than-a-bug-fix work to be done; neither QOF-pullout nor register-rewrite-in-gtk would be on my draft of that change-list, though. ...jsled -- http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
