On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 14:28 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > Right. I thought that the "larger-than-a-bug-fix" work was basically > compensating for obsolete dependencies. I agree about > register-rewrite. Could you explain what you consider to be > QOF-pullout? I mean, how much QOF work is needed to get a > G2-supporting release ASAP? This stuff isn't motivated in > GNOME2_STATUS.
Gnucash currently depends on a copy of QOF which was birthed inside gnucash itself. QOF should become an independent library, which gnucash then depends on as any other caller. The extrication of QOF involves changing some facilities at the border of the two. A good example is the gnc-trace.c-defined logging and module stuff, which is presently gnucash-specific, but really should be part of QOF. I'm sure that I'm not sure about all of the details of it; perhaps Neil can breifly summarize what's left. I don't believe that it relates to the G2 port at all. ...jsled -- http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
