On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 16:59 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > Nevertheless, I've been sitting on a stable, complete implementation > of budgeting since the spring, (I actually use it for my own > budgeting.) along with lots of other general improvements to > e.g. tracing, testing, debugging, etc. As soon as G2 is released and > a "dev" branch opens I was planning on pushing for inclusion(^).
> ... > > (^) I know there's an incomplete budget in G2, I was expecting it to > be removed for G2. If what's in the tree is broken and needs to be pulled, and you're sitting on a "stable complete implementation", then IMHO we clearly should commit your code. David _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
