Hi Andrew,
I really like your new icon set, good job.
Chris
Andrew Duggan wrote:
Hi,
Derek Atkins wrote:
I'm just not sure we need it... I know we need a few new icons.
You still need icons? The bugzilla
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327647) entry was closed
+30 days ago
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 22:17 -0400, Andrew Duggan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> > I'm just not sure we need it... I know we need a few new icons.
>
> You still need icons? The bugzilla
> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327647) entry was closed +30
> days ago saying you'
Hi,
Derek Atkins wrote:
I'm just not sure we need it... I know we need a few new icons.
You still need icons? The bugzilla
(http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327647) entry was closed +30
days ago saying you're all good with icons. So what icons do you have in
mind?
Andrew
P.
Oh, sorry, please don't let me discourage you.
I'm just not sure we need it... I know we need a few new icons.
And I /definitely/ know we need updated docs. If you want to
work on that... PLEASE!!! PLEASE do so
I dont want to discourage your enthusiasm! It's greatly appreciated.
-der
Patrick Schweiger schrieb:
> doc/tip_of_day.list.in continues to refer user to "what's new in 1.8".
...and here comes a patch to remove the entry from the file
I don't know how the docs are developed by the time we can add an
updated entry (or someone from the docpeople sends in a pat
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:11:33AM -0400, Mike Alexander wrote:
> I think the change in R13266 broke both the balance sheet and equity
> statement reports. Both of them pass (cons 0 0) as a starting time to
> gnc:accountlist-get-comm-balance-interval. It is eventually passed to
> (gnc:timepair
I think the change in R13266 broke both the balance sheet and equity
statement reports. Both of them pass (cons 0 0) as a starting time to
gnc:accountlist-get-comm-balance-interval. It is eventually passed to
(gnc:timepair-end-day-time (gnc:timepair-previous-day from)) which
seems to turn it
Derek Atkins wrote:
So... Do we REALLY need a new splash screen?
No.
What's wrong with the one we have, and have been using for a while?
There's nothing wrong with it.
I was goofing off, made one, thought you might like it, and offered it
to you. When people offered criticism I thought
On Saturday 15 April 2006 7:44 pm, David Hampton wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 19:23 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 April 2006 5:40 pm, David Hampton wrote:
> > >gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/kvp_frame.c
> > >gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/kvp_frame.h
> > > Log:
> > > The kvp_
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 19:23 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Saturday 15 April 2006 5:40 pm, David Hampton wrote:
> >gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/kvp_frame.c
> >gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/kvp_frame.h
> > Log:
> > The kvp_frame_get_string() function returns a pointer to an internal
> > str
So... Do we REALLY need a new splash screen?
What's wrong with the one we have, and have been using for a while?
-derek
Quoting Thomas Baumgart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
on Saturday 15 April 2006 16:20, Fabien COELHO wrote:
Dear Patrick,
> Joking aside though ... your observation is a
On Saturday 15 April 2006 5:40 pm, David Hampton wrote:
>gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/kvp_frame.c
>gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/kvp_frame.h
> Log:
> The kvp_frame_get_string() function returns a pointer to an internal
> string. Mark it 'const' to prevent callers from trying to free it.
An
Hi all,
on Saturday 15 April 2006 16:20, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Dear Patrick,
>
> > Joking aside though ... your observation is a perfectly reasonable
> > argument against the background. It does suggest you liked the
> > variations on top of the bill better than those with the generic
> > back
Hi
1) Start GnuCash (1.9.4 serie)
2) New File (no accounts)
3) Import this QIF file (Default on all questions)
4) Check the Accounts, and in particular the types.
Why is Expenses:Furnitue an Income for instance?
I tried to create the various accounts and categories and to set them
explicitly to
Some Ideas:
I'd like to see a basket or a bunch of currency-signs in the
background, or some animated currency signs dancing in an circle.
Gnucash is focussing on the administration of money as an abstraktion
of properties, not on the grabbing of money.
AFAIK GnuCash can deal with any currency, i
Here we go again...
diff -u of the text versions, and the xml file it self.
Have fun
/Bengt
--- /tmp/ch_txns_svn.txt 2006-04-16 01:02:28.0 +0800
+++ /tmp/ch_txns_1.9.txt 2006-04-16 01:01:38.0 +0800
@@ -59,11 +59,11 @@
Simple Transaction
For example, starting with the chart of
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 10:46 -0600, David V Herman wrote:
> I tried to standardize mine to 900 pixel wide, reason was to consider
> fitting on a printed page.
Smart... and perhaps I will have to retake a few screenshots later :(
Do know that some are slightly wider than 900...
> Size maybe OK, i
> Hi
>
> I have not resized any of the screen shots I have taken.
> Is this ok or?
>
I tried to standardize mine to 900 pixel wide, reason was to consider
fitting on a printed page.
> I have attached one of the normal sized ones for Chapter 2.
>
> Is this size ok, or?
>
Size maybe OK, is that
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 09:58 +, Patrick Schweiger wrote:
> Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >
> > See for instance :
> > http://www.newsmotion.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/accounting.jpg
> >
>
> I ran into that one and liked it too.
>
> > I'm not sure the image can be reused
>
> I doub
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 23:23 +0800, Bengt Thuree wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 10:57 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Quoting Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
>
> > > Any single non-alphanumeric unicode character.
> > >
> > > To me, alphanumeric means a-z, A-Z, 0-9 plus .,;: etc...
> >
> > No
Fabien COELHO wrote:
See for instance :
http://www.newsmotion.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/accounting.jpg
I ran into that one and liked it too.
I'm not sure the image can be reused
I doubt it ... and I'm unwilling to find out.
I'm not sure if these are representative of eno
Quoting Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 10:57 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any single non-alphanumeric unicode character.
>
> To me, alphanumeric means a-z, A-Z, 0-9 plus .,;: etc...
Nope, alphanumeric is [a-zA-z0-9]. Alpha
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 10:57 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Any single non-alphanumeric unicode character.
> >
> > To me, alphanumeric means a-z, A-Z, 0-9 plus .,;: etc...
>
> Nope, alphanumeric is [a-zA-z0-9]. Alpha == letter. Numeric == number.
>
Here we go again...
diff -u between the old and the new. (the text versions that is)
(This time I have not prettyfied the xml file, since I do not know how
to do it in Linux. Conglomerate do not seem to work to good in this...
crashed all the time)
Also included the new xml file, which is very n
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:36:49PM +0800, Bengt Thuree wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry, It's me again...:)
>
> Since I am not a native english speaker, I would like to have some help
> in explaining what the following means.
>
> Any single non-alphanumeric unicode character.
>
> To me, alphanumeric means
Quoting Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi
Sorry, It's me again...:)
Since I am not a native english speaker, I would like to have some help
in explaining what the following means.
Any single non-alphanumeric unicode character.
To me, alphanumeric means a-z, A-Z, 0-9 plus .,;: etc...
Nop
Hi
Sorry, It's me again...:)
Since I am not a native english speaker, I would like to have some help
in explaining what the following means.
Any single non-alphanumeric unicode character.
To me, alphanumeric means a-z, A-Z, 0-9 plus .,;: etc...
and non infront of it sort of removes all possible
Dear Patrick,
Joking aside though ... your observation is a perfectly reasonable argument
against the background. It does suggest you liked the variations on top of
the bill better than those with the generic backgrounds.
Yes and no. Having a background with bank notes is a good idea as fa
Fabien COELHO wrote:
Dear Geert,
Do you plan to localize the splashscreen so that it displays something
other that a USA one dollar bill?
I have to admit that was one of my first thoughts also. I wonder if
there is a more universal symbol for money. A pile of gold coins maybe ?
Possibly. M
Dear Geert,
I would like to offer a "new" splash screen nonetheless. If you've got
the time of day and are remotely interested, check out
www.spiffykitty.com/gnucashsplash for variations on your current flying
window's theme.
Here are my two euro-cents comments:
Do you plan to localize the s
Hello Patrick,
I would like to offer a "new" splash screen nonetheless. If you've got
the time of day and are remotely interested, check out
www.spiffykitty.com/gnucashsplash for variations on your current flying
window's theme.
Here are my two euro-cents comments:
Do you plan to localize
doc/tip_of_day.list.in continues to refer user to "what's new in 1.8".
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
I realize what you're actively asking for is a logo, and I'm aware
you've got your hands full trying to crank out 1.9.4 and 2.0. I would
like to offer a "new" splash screen nonetheless. The pie chart window
makes it "obvious" it depicts the 1.8.x generation (tabs to the left of
the plot). On t
33 matches
Mail list logo
