github-actions[bot] closed pull request #13420: Refactor signatures for lpad,
rpad, left, and right
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13420
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
mvzink commented on code in PR #1735:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1735#discussion_r1966627492
##
tests/sqlparser_mysql.rs:
##
@@ -2530,6 +2530,16 @@ fn parse_rlike_and_regexp() {
}
}
+#[test]
+fn parse_like_with_escape() {
+mysql().ve
mvzink commented on code in PR #1735:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1735#discussion_r1966627492
##
tests/sqlparser_mysql.rs:
##
@@ -2530,6 +2530,16 @@ fn parse_rlike_and_regexp() {
}
}
+#[test]
+fn parse_like_with_escape() {
+mysql().ve
vmingchen opened a new pull request, #64:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/64
1. Remove a duplicate sentence.
2. Replace backquote of the sql argument with single quote (backquote in
bash is for command substitution).
3. Since https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/
jayzhan211 commented on issue #14833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14833#issuecomment-2676556435
I see. The problem comes out when I run with `benches`, should be `--bench`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
jayzhan211 closed issue #14833: Cargo bench is eating up all the memory
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14833
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
alamb commented on code in PR #14657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14657#discussion_r1966506454
##
docs/source/user-guide/crate-configuration.md:
##
@@ -25,7 +25,47 @@ control DataFusion's behavior.
[configuration settings]: configs.md
-## Add latest non p
alamb closed pull request #14292: Revert "fix(expr-common): Coerce to
Decimal(20, 0) when combining UInt64 with signed integers (#14223)"
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14292
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
alamb closed pull request #14628: WIP: Update to `arrow`/`parquet` 54.2.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14628
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
alamb commented on PR #14628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14628#issuecomment-2676177352
Superceded by actual upgrades.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
ozankabak commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966506841
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
ozankabak commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966507366
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
AdamGS commented on issue #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1#issuecomment-2676158047
@logan-keede as part of moving avro functionality into
`datafusion-datasource-avro`, WDYT about putting all of it behind a feature
flag, the same way `parquet` is now? Seems like
alamb commented on PR #14292:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14292#issuecomment-2676177582
I think we decided we don't need to do this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
niebayes opened a new pull request, #14822:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14822
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #13700.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
Previously, the `SqlTo
iffyio commented on PR #1707:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1707#issuecomment-2676137037
Sorry im not sure I understood the question, could you clarify with a sql
example if that's possible?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To res
wiedld commented on code in PR #14821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14821#discussion_r1966451587
##
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_distribution.rs:
##
@@ -2203,7 +2203,7 @@ fn repartition_transitively_past_sort_with_projection()
-> Result<()>
alamb commented on issue #14373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14373#issuecomment-2676455981
I filed a ticket about substrait from Calcite not working here:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14831
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
alamb opened a new issue, #14832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14832
### Describe the bug
This is a report from @lmwnshn and is part of
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14373
enable_ident_normalization: I think there may be some extra complic
alamb commented on issue #14373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14373#issuecomment-2676456576
I also filed a ticket to track a potential issue with ident normalization
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14832
--
This is an automated message from the Apache G
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14823#discussion_r1966670496
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -446,21 +511,9 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
None => {
let sorted_size =
dentiny commented on code in PR #14694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1966653578
##
docs/source/contributor-guide/index.md:
##
@@ -216,3 +216,23 @@ The good thing about open code and open development is
that any issues in one ch
Pull reques
dentiny commented on code in PR #14694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14694#discussion_r1966652960
##
docs/source/contributor-guide/development_environment.md:
##
@@ -37,6 +37,22 @@ developing DataFusion in an isolated environment either
locally or remote if de
jayzhan211 opened a new issue, #14833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14833
### Describe the bug
When I run cargo bench command, 20+GB mem is consumed and not able to run in
my macbook. It is not the case before.
### To Reproduce
Run these commands
`
lmwnshn commented on issue #14831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14831#issuecomment-2676528540
I think people can look directly at Substrait's consumer-testing repo for
DataFusion if they want to fix this :) My repo is just a stripped-down rewrite
for students.
Som
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1439:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1439#issuecomment-2676356680
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1439?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
comphead commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966592342
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,1610 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license
comphead merged PR #14809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14809
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
tobixdev opened a new issue, #14828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14828
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
In our system we are working heavily with tagged unions. Basically every
column in our results are a `DataType::Union`. However, c
rkrishn7 opened a new pull request, #14829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14829
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14806
## Rationale for this change
This PR removes the condition that an inputs constants be empty in order to
validate its order
rkrishn7 commented on PR #14829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14829#issuecomment-2676428302
cc @alamb
Let me know if this change makes sense to you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
Omega359 commented on issue #13748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13748#issuecomment-2676369298
For anyone looking, I think
[this](https://github.com/influxdata/arrow-datafusion/pull/55) is the
workaround Influx has for this issue.
--
This is an automated message from
alan910127 commented on code in PR #14737:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14737#discussion_r1966587874
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/array.slt:
##
@@ -2265,6 +2265,35 @@ select array_sort([]);
[]
+# test with null arguments
+# expected error:
+#
Omega359 commented on PR #14653:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14653#issuecomment-2676370277
This should be ready for review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
findepi commented on issue #9881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9881#issuecomment-2676375161
`cargo +nightly udeps` has false positives in wasm tests
```
unused dependencies:
`datafusion-wasmtest v45.0.0
(/Users/findepi/repos/datafusion/datafusion/wasmtest)`
└─
findepi opened a new pull request, #14827:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14827
Found by `cargo udeps`. Unfortunately there were false positives too
(https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9881#issuecomment-2676375161).
--
This is an automated message from the
LucaCappelletti94 commented on PR #1707:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1707#issuecomment-2676086002
While things may change in the future, to the best of my knowledge some
indices can have operator classes and some cannot. Since we model the different
indices,
ozankabak commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966507949
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,1610 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license
jonahgao commented on code in PR #14794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14794#discussion_r1966477882
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/ddl.slt:
##
@@ -828,3 +828,39 @@ drop table table_with_pk;
statement ok
set datafusion.catalog.information_schema = false;
jonahgao merged PR #14794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14794
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
jonahgao closed issue #14340: Column for primary key not found in schema if
constraint column in uppercase
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14340
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
danila-b commented on code in PR #14331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14331#discussion_r1966524077
##
.github/workflows/extended.yml:
##
@@ -33,16 +33,46 @@ on:
push:
branches:
- main
+ issue_comment:
+types: [created]
+
+permissions:
+ pul
alamb commented on issue #14757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14757#issuecomment-2676189897
> [@alamb](https://github.com/alamb) how do y'all handle this at influx?
This one comes as quite a shocker to me. Does no one else using datafusion
support struct evolution?
alamb commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966502438
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
alamb commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966502387
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
alamb commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966502387
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
jayzhan211 opened a new pull request, #14824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14824
## Which issue does this PR close?
We convert count(constant) to count(*) in previous PR
so select count(1) * count(2) produces duplicated schema name error
- Closes #.
PokIsemaine commented on issue #14514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14514#issuecomment-2676170116
> > I noticed [#7622](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/7622), if
the syntax was originally not supported by
[sqlparser](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlpars
alamb commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966503758
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
jayzhan211 commented on PR #14689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14689#issuecomment-2676170935
Making extended tests optional seems like a better approach. This way, for
minor changes or cases where we're confident in the outcome, we can choose to
skip the tests.
https:/
Spaarsh commented on issue #754:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/754#issuecomment-2676172533
@timsaucer I was thinking of going down the route of writing some workaround
to this in our python interface since the issue originally mentioned it.
Changing the logic upst
alamb commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966501158
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/statistics.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,1610 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agr
ozankabak commented on PR #14689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14689#issuecomment-2676173794
> Making extended tests optional BUT easily visible and run it before merge
(maybe github supports such UI?) seems like a better approach.
If this is possible, certainly. If
alamb commented on code in PR #14637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14637#discussion_r1966505166
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/union_by_name.slt:
##
@@ -244,13 +244,15 @@ SELECT x, y FROM t1 UNION BY NAME (SELECT y, z FROM t2
INTERSECT SELECT 2, 2 as
3
LucaCappelletti94 commented on PR #1707:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1707#issuecomment-2676141068
Sure, so:
In a GIN index, there MAY be an operator class from a provided limited set,
in the following example `gin_trgm_ops`
```sql
CREATE INDE
logan-keede commented on issue #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1#issuecomment-2676185427
> [@logan-keede](https://github.com/logan-keede) as part of moving avro
functionality into `datafusion-datasource-avro`, WDYT about putting all of it
behind a feature flag,
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #14823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14823#discussion_r1966528251
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -446,21 +511,9 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
None => {
let sorted_size =
alamb commented on PR #14689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14689#issuecomment-2676180834
> > Making extended tests optional BUT easily visible and run it before
merge (maybe github supports such UI?) seems like a better approach.
>
> If this is possible, certainl
alamb commented on issue #13748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13748#issuecomment-2676183097
I am basically stalled with this code -- I have some ideas but we have a
workaround downstream in InfluxData and a bunch of other priorities have come
up since then
--
This is
iffyio commented on PR #1707:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1707#issuecomment-2676183454
Ah I see thanks for clarifying!
1. I think introducing a `Custom` variant would be reasonable, it would be
similar to the existing pattern of `DataType::Custom`, `Bi
alamb commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966510247
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
alamb commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966510247
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
alamb commented on issue #1671:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1671#issuecomment-2676181725
It is likely about time to make another release of sqlparser. I plan to do
so next week -- I am a bit behind this week
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
alamb commented on issue #14319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14319#issuecomment-2676181434
Ths came up again in the context of
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14689
It would be great to figure out how to get this working
--
This is an automated m
alamb commented on issue #14816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14816#issuecomment-2676186699
> Are there existing mechanisms in DataFusion to handle external iterators
or row sources?
There is a PR we are currently working on related to metadata columns (which
coul
alamb closed issue #14814: Datafusion-cli: when the max rows setting inf, we
are missing the unlimited case for bounded streaming.
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14814
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
alamb commented on PR #14651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14651#issuecomment-2676189108
> I'll reopen when the datafusion-datasource crate is arranged.
@logan-keede has completed that PR and it is now merged!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Se
alamb commented on issue #14554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14554#issuecomment-2676190385
> From what is see in current code, this struct `PullUpCorrelatedExpr` is
applied for scalar subquery as well as predicate subquery.
>
> For that paper implementation, i'll
alamb commented on issue #14816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14816#issuecomment-2676188552
> We are using DataFusion to query Parquet files and wondering if the result
of the query can be represented as a bit set of the document position (example
below). Bit sets from t
alamb merged PR #14815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14815
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
simonvandel opened a new pull request, #14830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14830
## Which issue does this PR close?
Part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10177. It does not close
it, as there is no support for timestamp arguments.
## Rat
cfis commented on issue #1018:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1018#issuecomment-2676440635
Thanks for looking into this @kosiew.
Yes, I understand that the duplicate fields come from the combination of
hive partition fields and the parquet fields. However, I
Omega359 commented on code in PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#discussion_r1966565413
##
content/blog/2025-02-20-datafusion-45.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 45.0.0 Released
+date: 2025-02-20
+categories: [
Omega359 commented on code in PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#discussion_r1966515761
##
content/blog/2025-02-20-datafusion-45.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 45.0.0 Released
+date: 2025-02-20
+categories: [
Lordworms commented on issue #13286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13286#issuecomment-2676330289
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1439
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
In preparation for improving the shuffle writer, this PR simply moves some
code out o
alamb commented on code in PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#discussion_r1966493967
##
content/blog/2025-02-20-datafusion-45.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 45.0.0 Released
+date: 2025-02-20
+categories: [rel
Chen-Yuan-Lai opened a new pull request, #14826:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14826
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14762 .
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these cha
2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #14823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14823
## Which issue does this PR close?
Follow up to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14644, this PR fixes
an unsolved failing case for external sort. It's found by
https://
alamb commented on code in PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#discussion_r1966495105
##
content/blog/2025-02-20-datafusion-45.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 45.0.0 Released
+date: 2025-02-20
Review Comment:
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #14823:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14823#discussion_r1966496849
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/sorts/sort.rs:
##
@@ -446,21 +511,9 @@ impl ExternalSorter {
None => {
let sorted_size =
alamb commented on PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#issuecomment-2676158225
@ozankabak and @comphead and @andygrove and @Dandandan ,
Are there other things / features you think we should highlight in the
DataFusion 45 blog post (that covers the last seve
ozankabak commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966456466
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/interval_arithmetic.rs:
##
@@ -1119,11 +1180,11 @@ fn next_value_helper(value:
ScalarValue) -> ScalarValue {
match value {
alamb commented on issue #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1#issuecomment-2676188953
> > [@logan-keede](https://github.com/logan-keede) as part of moving avro
functionality into `datafusion-datasource-avro`, WDYT about putting all of it
behind a feature flag, the
ozankabak commented on code in PR #14699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14699#discussion_r1966514940
##
datafusion/physical-expr-common/src/physical_expr.rs:
##
@@ -144,6 +153,111 @@ pub trait PhysicalExpr: Send + Sync + Display + Debug +
DynEq + DynHash {
Omega359 commented on code in PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#discussion_r1966515761
##
content/blog/2025-02-20-datafusion-45.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 45.0.0 Released
+date: 2025-02-20
+categories: [
Omega359 commented on code in PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#discussion_r1966516600
##
content/blog/2025-02-20-datafusion-45.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 45.0.0 Released
+date: 2025-02-20
+categories: [
Omega359 commented on code in PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#discussion_r1966516700
##
content/blog/2025-02-20-datafusion-45.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 45.0.0 Released
+date: 2025-02-20
+categories: [
Omega359 commented on code in PR #57:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/57#discussion_r1966516624
##
content/blog/2025-02-20-datafusion-45.0.0.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Apache DataFusion 45.0.0 Released
+date: 2025-02-20
+categories: [
danila-b closed pull request #14825: Fix ref head for issue comment
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14825
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsu
danila-b opened a new pull request, #14825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14825
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes tested
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14824#discussion_r1966519181
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/aggregates/mod.rs:
##
@@ -1231,6 +1233,13 @@ fn evaluate(
expr: &[Arc],
batch: &RecordBatch,
) -> Result> {
+// h
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1035:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1035
Bumps [arrow](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs) from 54.1.0 to 54.2.0.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/releases";>arrow's
releases.
ar
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1034:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1034
Bumps [uuid](https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid) from 1.13.1 to 1.14.0.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/uuid-rs/uuid/releases";>uuid's releases.
v1.14.0
alamb commented on issue #5173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5173#issuecomment-2676454727
Hi @niebayes, this PR from @robtandy may be quite relevant to your work
building a distributed execuiton engine:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ray/pull/60
The larg
alamb opened a new issue, #14831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14831
### Describe the bug
This is a report from @lmwnshn
As part of a series of issues that were discovered at CMU while working on
DataFusion
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #13734: [POC] Try to plan
ast::Expr::CompoundFieldAccess syntax
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13734
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1590:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1590#issuecomment-2676503628
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1591:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1591#issuecomment-2676503607
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or
jayzhan211 commented on issue #14833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14833#issuecomment-2676535170
Btw this happens at compile time
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
