findepi commented on issue #12635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/12635#issuecomment-2650048313
Going back to this topic. Not much happened on the Simple Functions front,
but a lot happened in the world. New type system changes (Logical types can be
found in type signature
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1386:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1386#issuecomment-2650028890
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1386?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
eliaperantoni commented on issue #14433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14433#issuecomment-2650017992
> @eliaperantoni thank you so much for the detailed explanation! Since
`Expr::Negative` and `Expr::Not` just wraps another `Expr`, does it mean that I
need to make span av
zuston commented on PR #1377:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1377#issuecomment-2649984295
From the org of
[datafusion-contrib](https://github.com/datafusion-contrib?q=hdfs&type=all&language=&sort=),
I see many hdfs crates, which one is best for comet?
--
T
kazuyukitanimura opened a new pull request, #1386:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1386
## Which issue does this PR close?
## Rationale for this change
DataFusion has an unbounded memory pool. I found it useful for experimental
purpose.
## What chang
adriangb commented on code in PR #14567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14567#discussion_r1950314013
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/pruning.rs:
##
@@ -1710,6 +1717,56 @@ fn build_like_match(
Some(combined)
}
+// For predicate `col NOT LIKE 'foo%'`,
adriangb commented on code in PR #14567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14567#discussion_r1950314013
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/pruning.rs:
##
@@ -1710,6 +1717,56 @@ fn build_like_match(
Some(combined)
}
+// For predicate `col NOT LIKE 'foo%'`,
wForget commented on PR #14575:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14575#issuecomment-2649905045
> thanks @wForget I feel it is great to avoid fallible scenario. Please
create a bench like for other string functions to see if we get a performance
downside introducing new branch
himadripal opened a new pull request, #1385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1385
Completes #375
- enable decimal to decimal
- remove hard coded castoptions to pass to native execution
- use a regex to match arrow invalid argument error.
## Which is
UBarney commented on code in PR #14567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14567#discussion_r1950259492
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/pruning.rs:
##
@@ -1710,6 +1717,56 @@ fn build_like_match(
Some(combined)
}
+// For predicate `col NOT LIKE 'foo%'`, w
UBarney commented on code in PR #14567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14567#discussion_r1950259274
##
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/pruning.rs:
##
@@ -1590,6 +1590,13 @@ fn build_statistics_expr(
)),
))
}
+Opera
UBarney commented on PR #14567:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14567#issuecomment-2649842916
> I assume this should also work with no wildcards `col not like 'foo'`?
Yes. add some test to demonstrate it
There's also an optimization to rewrite `col not like 'foo'` as
Chen-Yuan-Lai opened a new pull request, #14597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14597
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14115.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
As https://github
jkosh44 closed pull request #14596: cli: Add nested expressions
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14596
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
jkosh44 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1950225082
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -227,25 +226,13 @@ impl Display for TypeSignatureClass {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Has
anlinc commented on code in PR #14553:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14553#discussion_r194450
##
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/builder.rs:
##
@@ -1090,11 +1090,31 @@ impl LogicalPlanBuilder {
group_expr: impl IntoIterator>,
aggr_expr: im
jkosh44 opened a new pull request, #14596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14596
## Which issue does this PR close?
None
## Rationale for this change
Without this I am unable to use nested expressions with the CLI.
## What changes are included in thi
zhuqi-lucas commented on issue #13270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13270#issuecomment-2649754388
@adriangb Sorry for the delay, i am starting to investigate this issue this
week.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
xudong963 commented on issue #14123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14123#issuecomment-2649751148
> [@xudong963](https://github.com/xudong963) when would you like to start
making the release? Maybe we should targe the week of Feb 24 🤔
yes, the week is suitable.
--
clflushopt commented on issue #3843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3843#issuecomment-2649742371
Hey @alamb thanks for the clear answer, yes that sounds good ! It's seems
that both ticket for interval boundary and selectivity analysis for `AND` &
`OR` conjunctions seem ope
parthchandra commented on issue #1382:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1382#issuecomment-2649739992
> [@parthchandra](https://github.com/parthchandra) With comet shuffle
disabled, the plan is almost like vanilla spark's because it replaces comet SHJ
to spark SHJ. And
ugoa commented on PR #14544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14544#issuecomment-2649706593
Hey @alamb , btw we probably need to remove the installation of `cmake` in
the `.github/actions/setup-builder/action.yaml` since it was added for
`snmalloc-rs = "0.3"` which we don't ne
wForget commented on code in PR #1384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1384#discussion_r1950145187
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/CometSparkSessionExtensions.scala:
##
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ class CometSparkSessionExtensions
newOp match
wForget closed pull request #1384: fix: correct the logic of transform shuffle
exchange
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1384
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
hayman42 commented on issue #1382:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1382#issuecomment-2649656840
@parthchandra With comet shuffle disabled, the plan is almost like vanilla
spark's because it replaces comet SHJ to spark SHJ. And thus it preserves
spark's performance. H
jayzhan211 commented on PR #14470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14470#issuecomment-2649652793
> > I have the same question for `array_min`, but if this function is highly
interested from many people then adding it to datafusion core is not a bad
idea. [#14417
(comment)](h
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1561:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1561#issuecomment-2649649028
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #13584: Implement RightSemi join for
SortMergeJoin
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13584
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
shehabgamin commented on PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#issuecomment-2649643809
@jayzhan211 I will re-review by tomorrow EOD!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
jayzhan211 commented on issue #14380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14380#issuecomment-2649641630
> Since `exprlist_to_fields` is called in the builder, it seems that
wildcard expansion still hasn't been delayed.
Computing schema for wildcard is different from expan
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1950125583
##
datafusion/functions-nested/src/remove.rs:
##
@@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for ArrayRemove {
}
fn return_type(&self, arg_types: &[DataTyp
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1950111843
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -227,25 +226,13 @@ impl Display for TypeSignatureClass {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd,
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1950111843
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -227,25 +226,13 @@ impl Display for TypeSignatureClass {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd,
jayzhan211 commented on issue #7765:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7765#issuecomment-2649611265
I don't think we use wildcard for count in datafusion,
`COUNT_STAR_EXPANSION` is used instead which is `count(1)`. As long as we have
alternative representation of wildcard (i.
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1950111843
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -227,25 +226,13 @@ impl Display for TypeSignatureClass {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd,
jayzhan211 commented on issue #14380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14380#issuecomment-2649605687
> but some users do not want the casts introduced by `TypeCoercion`
We can make it optional
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
skyzh commented on PR #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14595#issuecomment-2649598864
cc @alamb would you please help take a look as you were engaged on lateral
join discussions before? Thanks :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
skyzh opened a new pull request, #14595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14595
## Which issue does this PR close?
- part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10048
## Rationale for this change
Add partial lateral join support.
comphead commented on PR #1377:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1377#issuecomment-2649578244
@parthchandra @andygrove @kazuyukitanimura @mbutrovich
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #14440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440#discussion_r1950091410
##
datafusion/expr/src/type_coercion/functions.rs:
##
@@ -596,75 +594,93 @@ fn get_valid_types(
vec![vec![target_type; *num]]
}
cfis opened a new issue, #1018:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1018
This might be more of an arrow issue, but I am running into this error:
`Exception: DataFusion error: SchemaError(DuplicateQualifiedField {
qualifier: Bare { table: "data" }, name: "year" }, S
alan910127 commented on issue #14433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14433#issuecomment-2649567282
@eliaperantoni thank you so much for the detailed explanation! Since
`Expr::Negative` and `Expr::Not` just wraps another `Expr`, does it mean that I
need to make span availab
parthchandra commented on code in PR #1384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1384#discussion_r1950074930
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/CometSparkSessionExtensions.scala:
##
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ class CometSparkSessionExtensions
newOp
parthchandra commented on issue #1382:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1382#issuecomment-2649541224
@hayman42 what a great find. I have not observed this myself even at
SF1, probably because by default we were falling back to SMJ. Would you be
able to compare the
andygrove merged PR #1173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1173
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
andygrove merged PR #1175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1175
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
andygrove closed issue #1174: `/api/executors` does not show executors if
`TaskSchedulingPolicy::PullStaged`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1174
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
andygrove merged PR #1171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1171
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr.
TylerBrinks commented on PR #1715:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1715#issuecomment-2649495366
I think I got it right in the updated most recent push. Awaiting approval
if it passes the criteria.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
T
Omega359 commented on issue #14482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14482#issuecomment-2649427623
I know the dataframe api isn't used by many but it needs some love too:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14563
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
Omega359 commented on issue #14542:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14542#issuecomment-2649418794
Is this an issue with DataFusion's website or something else? I'm leaning
towards you filing this ticket on the wrong project here.
--
This is an automated message from the A
anlinc commented on code in PR #14553:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14553#discussion_r194450
##
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/builder.rs:
##
@@ -1090,11 +1090,31 @@ impl LogicalPlanBuilder {
group_expr: impl IntoIterator>,
aggr_expr: im
Omega359 commented on PR #14592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14592#issuecomment-2649406057
I recommend we disable that test until someone is able to spend more time
looking into why it is using so much disk space
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
Omega359 commented on PR #14592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14592#issuecomment-2649389285
It didn't solve the issue :(
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
Omega359 commented on code in PR #14538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14538#discussion_r1949980327
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/union_by_name.slt:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Review Comment:
Du
Omega359 commented on PR #14538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14538#issuecomment-2649370553
I ran the sqlite sqllogictests against your branch and it passed so none of
those files covered union (all) by name
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #14594:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14594
Bumps [serialize-javascript](https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript)
to 6.0.2 and updates ancestor dependency
[copy-webpack-plugin](https://github.com/webpack-contrib/copy-webpack-
alamb merged PR #14592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14592
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #14576: Extended tests are (still) failing on main
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14576
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
kazuyukitanimura commented on PR #1369:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1369#issuecomment-2649342229
Merged, thanks @andygrove
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
kazuyukitanimura merged PR #1369:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1369
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsub
jkosh44 commented on code in PR #14532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14532#discussion_r1949114839
##
datafusion/expr-common/src/signature.rs:
##
@@ -227,25 +226,13 @@ impl Display for TypeSignatureClass {
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Has
simonvandel opened a new pull request, #14593:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14593
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
I haven't looked at the generated code, but i presume that using `try_unary`
can lead to better vectori
Omega359 opened a new pull request, #14592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14592
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #14576
## Rationale for this change
Get CI working again.
## What changes are included in this PR?
added carg
Omega359 commented on issue #14576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14576#issuecomment-2649274047
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
Omega359 commented on issue #14591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14591#issuecomment-2649265913
Dup of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14576
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
Omega359 closed issue #14591: Extended tests are currently failing with 'No
space left on device'
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14591
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Omega359 opened a new issue, #14591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14591
### Describe the bug
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/actions/workflows/extended.yml
We likely need to add cargo clean between steps.
### To Reproduce
_No response_
Omega359 commented on issue #14580:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14580#issuecomment-2649254014
My personal list
- Find/fix cause of [with_column extremely poor
performance](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14563)
- Add [SessionConfig to
ScalarFunc
findepi commented on code in PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#discussion_r1949864649
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q6.slt.part:
##
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ logical_plan
01)Projection: sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * lineitem.l_discoun
findepi commented on PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#issuecomment-2649198349
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#discussion_r1949864649
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
findepi closed pull request #14273: Fix Float and Decimal coercion
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsub
alamb commented on issue #14581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14581#issuecomment-2649156397
I believe @jayzhan211 is working on coercion
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14440
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
andygrove commented on code in PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#discussion_r1949798289
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q6.slt.part:
##
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ logical_plan
01)Projection: sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * lineitem.l_disco
edmondop opened a new pull request, #14590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14590
Adds an ad-hoc pipeline for running cargo mutants as discussed in #14589
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
edmondop commented on issue #13661:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13661#issuecomment-2649098650
I have logged [this](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14589)
@alamb there are some more details in that issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
edmondop opened a new issue, #14589:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14589
As described in #13661 we want to improve our pre-release testing. I propose
we adopt [mutation based
testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation_testing) using [`cargo
mutants`](https://mutants
findepi commented on PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#issuecomment-2649082381
> Marking as a draft as I don't think this is waiting for review anymore
(nor have we figured out a consensus either)
I think we're having a lively discussion. It's definitely
findepi commented on code in PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#discussion_r1949783816
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q6.slt.part:
##
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ logical_plan
01)Projection: sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * lineitem.l_discoun
jasonbhansen opened a new issue, #1722:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1722
`fn main() -> ProfilerResult<()> {
// tracing_subscriber::fmt()
// .with_max_level(tracing::Level::DEBUG)
// .init();
use sqlparser::dialect::GenericD
Omega359 commented on issue #14563:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14563#issuecomment-2649003746
If someone would be so kind as to [generate a
flamegraph](https://datafusion.apache.org/library-user-guide/profiling.html#example-flamegraph-for-a-benchmark)
for the benchmark
kazuyukitanimura commented on PR #1369:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1369#issuecomment-2648964068
Went ahead and kept the default pool choice @andygrove
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #1369:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1369#discussion_r1949709211
##
native/core/src/execution/fair_memory_pool.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more cont
kazuyukitanimura commented on PR #1369:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1369#issuecomment-2648941470
Thanks @andygrove for trying. You may have to increase the memory because
the fair memory pool limits memory usage earlier in order to leave the the rest
for other thre
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #1343:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1343#discussion_r1949694482
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometArrayExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -292,4 +292,89 @@ class CometArrayExpressionSuite extends CometTestBas
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #1343:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1343#discussion_r1949690727
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/serde/QueryPlanSerde.scala:
##
@@ -2387,6 +2387,8 @@ object QueryPlanSerde extends Logging with
ShimQueryPla
andygrove commented on code in PR #14273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14273#discussion_r1949552271
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q6.slt.part:
##
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ logical_plan
01)Projection: sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * lineitem.l_disco
parthchandra commented on PR #1376:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1376#issuecomment-2648702671
@andygrove updates this to fallback, updated the unit tests and removed the
draft tag
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
Omega359 commented on issue #14536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14536#issuecomment-2648671927
> I had the impression (although perhaps it is dated) that datafusion sought
to be compatible with postgres to the extent reasonable. Assuming thats still
the case is there a r
Spaarsh commented on issue #14588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14588#issuecomment-2648658163
I am willing to work on this issue once it is validated by the community.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
Spaarsh opened a new issue, #14588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14588
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
As we increase the number of functions in our core, it might lead to an
increased runtime footprint for datafusion-cli in the futur
Rachelint commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648640934
For optimizer side, I suspect if `single_distinct_to_groupby` can really
improve performance in current version?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
alamb commented on issue #14576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14576#issuecomment-2648636639
I noticed that the github runner generated several warnings about diskspace
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/918fb3a4-1149-41b7-9027-e62721ac8800";
/>
--
alamb commented on PR #14331:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14331#issuecomment-2648628261
I merged this test up from main
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
Rachelint commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648625729
> > I am trying a poc about support block approach by only modifying codes
of group values(we also need to modifying codes of GroupAccumulatortoo in
[#11943](https://github.co
alamb commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648610440
> I am trying a poc about support block approach by only modifying codes of
group values(we also need to modifying codes of GroupAccumulatortoo in
https://github.com/apache/datafu
Rachelint commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648602542
A low hanging fruit #13617, i plan to finish it in this week.
And maybe it is time to push #11943 forward...
I am trying a poc about support `block approach` by `
alamb commented on issue #13983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/13983#issuecomment-2648602300
Discussion about making more improvements:
- https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/C04RJ0C85UZ/p1739204225620989
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
alamb commented on issue #14586:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14586#issuecomment-2648588773
I took a brief look at [some
results](https://benchmark.clickhouse.com/#eyJzeXN0ZW0iOnsiQWxsb3lEQiI6ZmFsc2UsIkFsbG95REIgKHR1bmVkKSI6ZmFsc2UsIkF0aGVuYSAocGFydGl0aW9uZWQpIjpmYWxzZSwi
benrsatori closed pull request #1721: Add support for PostgreSQL and Redshift
geometric operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1721
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL ab
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
