On Wednesday 26 Apr 2017 11:51:54 Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-04-26 10:53, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > # revdep-rebuild --library 'libstdc++.so.6' -- --exclude="gcc gentoo-
> > sources" --jobs --load-average=48
> >
> > ...only to find that gentoo-sources was indeed emerged, though gcc
> > wasn't.
I have been noticing these kind of errors on a couple of overlays lately:
# /usr/bin/eclean-dist
* Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
* ERROR: dev-python/python-evas-::enlightenment failed (depend phase):
* python.eclass could not be found by inherit()
*
* Call sta
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:17:16 +0100, Mick wrote:
> I have been noticing these kind of errors on a couple of overlays
> lately:
>
> # /usr/bin/eclean-dist
> * Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
> * ERROR: dev-python/python-evas-::enlightenment failed (depend
> phase):
> * python
Hi,
i just have a question regarding packages using linux-info.eclass to check
for specific kernel config flags (e.g. app-emaulation/docker).
Currently it seems like the flags are only checked against the config in
/usr/src/linux which is not necessariliy the running kernel.
Furthermore there ar
On 04/27/2017 10:45 AM, Manuel Schönlaub wrote:
Hi,
i just have a question regarding packages using linux-info.eclass to
check for specific kernel config flags (e.g. app-emaulation/docker).
Currently it seems like the flags are only checked against the config
in /usr/src/linux which is not n
On Thursday 27 Apr 2017 09:26:15 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:17:16 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > I have been noticing these kind of errors on a couple of overlays
> >
> > lately:
> > # /usr/bin/eclean-dist
> > * Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
> > * ERROR: dev-python/pyt
Le 27/04/17 à 10:45, Manuel Schönlaub a tapoté :
> Does there exists a tool helping in maintaining consistency between
> kernel configuration and configs required by currently installed
> packages.
>
> If not, could emaint be be the right tool to extend with this
> functionality? Or is this functi
Hi,
you could set the symlink IUSE for your kernel package, that way your
/usr/src/linux symlink would always link to your most recent kernel
On 27 Apr 2017 10:45 am, Manuel Schönlaub wrote:
Hi,
i just have a question regarding packages using linux-info.eclass to check for
specific kernel con
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Schönlaub
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i just have a question regarding packages using linux-info.eclass to check
> for specific kernel config flags (e.g. app-emaulation/docker).
>
> Currently it seems like the flags are only checked against the config in
> /usr/src/li
On Thursday 27 Apr 2017 09:57:21 Rasmus Thomsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you could set the symlink IUSE for your kernel package, that way your
> /usr/src/linux symlink would always link to your most recent kernel
Almost. It will always point to the most recently emerged kernel sources.
--
Regards
Pete
Yeah, but as your most recently emerged kernel usually is the one your going to
use (why would you emerge it otherwise), it should work (most of the time)
On Thursday 27 Apr 2017 12:03:41 Rasmus Thomsen wrote:
> Yeah, but as your most recently emerged kernel usually is the one your
> going to use (why would you emerge it otherwise), it should work (most of
> the time)
Yes, it is usually, but not always. For instance, if you emerge -e world you
may
On 04/26/2017 11:03 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 06:01:20AM +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote
>
>> That flag isn't mentioned here.
>
> I checked the source code. It forces the old ABI, so it should work,
> compiled with GCC 5.4.0, even on a Gcc 4.9.4 system...
>
> [CentOS65][pmb
On 2017-04-27, Danny YUE wrote:
> I recently found that rsnapshot (based on rsync) is a good and solid
> tool for backup...You may try it out ;-)
I second the recommendation for rsnapshot. I've been using rsnampshot
for several years to backup stuff to an external Firewire RAID array.
The reall
On 2017-04-27, Guy-Laurent Subri wrote:
> Here's the link to the website: http://st.suckless.org/
> And here's also a link if you want other terminals that support
> truecolors : https://gist.github.com/XVilka/8346728
I'm curious what true-color support actually _does_ in an ANSI
terminal emulat
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
> Hi R0b0t1,
>
> On 04/25 02:15, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:47 AM, wrote:
>> > I googled qyite a bit to find 24color terminal
>> > emulators and the one, which came closer to
>> > what I want is sakure.
>> > But comparing the speed of sak
Hi folks,
it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
the new gcc5.
I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
When I type something in an already opened Xterm it says "Ungültiger
Maschine
Try rebooting, worst thing you'll have to do if it doesn't want to reboot
is boot a rescue image and mount it to repair it
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017, 10:22 AM wabe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
> the new gcc5.
>
> I even cannot execute any
On April 27, 2017 7:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, wabe wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
>the new gcc5.
>
>I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
>not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
>
>When I type some
Ian Bloss wrote:
> Try rebooting, worst thing you'll have to do if it doesn't want to
> reboot is boot a rescue image and mount it to repair it
I don't know how to repair it because I don't know what exactly is
broken. At the moment I can at least ask the M/L. I don't wanna lose
also this possi
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On April 27, 2017 7:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, wabe
> wrote:
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
> >the new gcc5.
> >
> >I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
> >not possible to open a terminal o
On Do, 27 Apr 19:43:46 +0200
wabe wrote:
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
On April 27, 2017 7:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, wabe
wrote:
On tty12 I can see messages […]
Try to switch to an other virtual terminal (with Ctrl+Alt+2) and start
from there.
But I cannot open another terminal. I don't even see what
I tried to reboot the system. But even this did not work. So I
toggled the power. The system booted without problems and it
seems that everything works well again.
I wonder what caused the trouble. The last package that was
compiled successfully was media-plugins/frei0r-plugins-1.5.0.
The next p
Hi,
"Invalid Machine command" (forgot the exact error message) usually happened to
me when I passed the wrong -march to GCC (e.g. -march=haswell on sandybridge
cpus)
Regards,
Rasmus
On 27 Apr 2017 7:43 pm, wabe wrote:
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On April 27, 2017 7:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, wabe
>
Rasmus Thomsen wrote:
> Hi,
> "Invalid Machine command" (forgot the exact error message) usually
> happened to me when I passed the wrong -march to GCC (e.g.
> -march=haswell on sandybridge cpus)
I'm using -march native since many years. After restarting my machine
everything works fine again.
wabe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
> the new gcc5.
>
> I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
> not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
>
> When I type something in an already opened Xterm it
Dale wrote:
> wabe wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
> > the new gcc5.
> >
> > I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
> > not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
> >
> > When I type somet
wabe wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>> wabe wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> it seems that my system is broken after recompiling everything with
>>> the new gcc5.
>>>
>>> I even cannot execute any command or start new programs. It is also
>>> not possible to open a terminal or to login on console.
>>>
>>> W
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:56:00 -0500, Dale wrote:
> One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you have to
> go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E generally
> gets things back to a point it is accessible and I don't have to go
> through it all. I think once y
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:56:00 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> > One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you
> > have to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E
> > generally gets things back to a point it is accessible and I don't
> > have to
On Do, 27 Apr 16:56:00 -0500
Dale wrote:
One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you have
to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E generally
gets things back to a point it is accessible and I don't have to go
through it all. I think once you get to the
Floyd Anderson wrote:
> On Do, 27 Apr 16:56:00 -0500
> Dale wrote:
> >One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you
> >have >to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E
> >generally >gets things back to a point it is accessible and I don't
> >have to go >thro
wabe wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:56:00 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you
>>> have to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E
>>> generally gets things back to a point it is accessible and I d
I need to replace one of my Brother printers and am looking for a
replacement. I have had luck in recent years with Brother printers:
- HL-5250DN (needs to be replaced)
- HL-5370 - working OK
I only need a B/W printer with an Ethernet interface. Toner usage is
important. Average pages per day wil
Hi guys,
I am compiling RISC-V tools...I am just curious how do you manage your
manually compiled software? Here are some options:
1) Just "make install" everything into /usr/local. But if the Makefile
does not have removing option, how do you remove it then?
2) Put compiled software into /usr/l
On Fr, 28 Apr 01:27:23 +0200
wabe wrote:
Floyd Anderson wrote:
On Do, 27 Apr 16:56:00 -0500
Dale wrote:
>One thing about alt sysreq, once you get to a certain point, you
>have >to go "all the way" with it. I've found that just the R and E
>generally >gets things back to a point it is accessi
On 04/27/2017 09:33 PM, Danny YUE wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am compiling RISC-V tools...I am just curious how do you manage your
> manually compiled software?
Don't, write an ebuild for it.
On 2017-04-28 09:33, Danny YUE wrote:
> I am compiling RISC-V tools...I am just curious how do you manage your
> manually compiled software?
Michael already posted the "correct answer", and that's what I'm slowly
migrating towards, myself.
But the best way I've found before that was install it i
On 04/28/2017 04:33 AM, Danny YUE wrote:
Hi guys,
I am compiling RISC-V tools...I am just curious how do you manage your
manually compiled software?
I make ebuilds for them and put them in /usr/local/portage.
39 matches
Mail list logo
