On 8/30/20 10:02 PM, n952162 wrote:
In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves. I've never had this with display(1) before,
and can find nothing in the internet about it.
Out of desperation, I've found out a workaround to this. This
workaround suggests that it's a (introduced) bug in the program, because
I can't make out any logic to it.
im-display-eg-200913-1.png shows how the background is a not transparent
but a single color from the original background. Note
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:00:38AM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-08-31 23:52, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> > > In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
> > > image edit draw function, it includes an opaque b
On 2020-08-31 23:52, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:
In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves. I've never had this w
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
> image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
> just the lines themselves. I've never had this with display(1) before,
First you use draw,
In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves. I've never had this with display(1) before,
and can find nothing in the internet about it. That suggests to me that
it's - aga
Having re-synced portage it now asks me to keyword media-gfx/
inkscape-1.0_beta1 and once I do, portage wants to downgrade media-gfx/
imagemagick from the installed 7.0.8.67 to 6.9.10.67.
I'm not sure why imagemagick is asking to be downgraded, or for that matter
why inkscape should be keyworded:
Thank you for the solution, will give it a try this evening!
James
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, 00:06 David Haller, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, James Stevenson wrote:
> >I'm struggling to get emacs to incorporate imagemagick to allow for
> >rudimental image viewing and manipulation functio
Hello,
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, James Stevenson wrote:
>I'm struggling to get emacs to incorporate imagemagick to allow for
>rudimental image viewing and manipulation functionality. I have both
>media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8-50 and app-editors/emacs-26.2 installed.
Save the attached patch I found upstr
Hello all,
I'm struggling to get emacs to incorporate imagemagick to allow for
rudimental image viewing and manipulation functionality. I have both
media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8-50 and app-editors/emacs-26.2 installed.
With imagemagick installed prior to an emacs rebuild the compiler output
says so
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 09:28:03 BST Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
> August 23, 2018 10:12 AM, "Peter Humphrey" wrote:
> > That prompted me to emerge -K imagemagick, and I saw the same. But just
> > before the line " * For security reasons..." was this:
> >
> > /var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/ima
August 23, 2018 10:28 AM, "Corentin “Nado” Pazdera" wrote:
> August 23, 2018 10:12 AM, "Peter Humphrey" wrote:
>
>> That prompted me to emerge -K imagemagick, and I saw the same. But just
>> before the line " * For security reasons..." was this:
>>
>> /var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0
August 23, 2018 10:12 AM, "Peter Humphrey" wrote:
> That prompted me to emerge -K imagemagick, and I saw the same. But just
> before the line " * For security reasons..." was this:
>
> /var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8.10-r1/temp/environment: line
> 2260: version_is_at_least: command
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 09:06:12 BST Mick wrote:
> I noticed this enotice in imagemagick:
>
> * For security reasons, a policy.xml file was installed in
> /etc/ImageMagick-7 * which will prevent the usage of the following coders
> by default: *
> * - PS
> * - EPS
> * - PDF
> * - X
I noticed this enotice in imagemagick:
* For security reasons, a policy.xml file was installed in /etc/ImageMagick-7
* which will prevent the usage of the following coders by default:
*
* - PS
* - EPS
* - PDF
* - XPS
Excuse my ignorance, but I am not sure wh
On 12/06/2016 12:50, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am 12.06.2016 um 12:05 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other
than masking graphics magick):
[blocks B ] media-gfx/graphics
On 12/06/2016 12:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:05:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it
(other than masking graphics magick):
[blocks B ] medi
Am 12.06.2016 um 12:05 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
> ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other
> than masking graphics magick):
>
> [blocks B ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
> ("media-gfx
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:05:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
> ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it
> (other than masking graphics magick):
>
> [blocks B ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
Hi all,
My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other
than masking graphics magick):
[blocks B ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
m
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 03:37:02AM +0100, Penguin Lover Frank Steinmetzger
squawked:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:59:27AM +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> > Frank Steinmetzger writes:
> >
> > It seems you can install graphicsmagick along with imagemagick, if the
> > imagemagick USE flag ist not set.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:59:27AM +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Frank Steinmetzger writes:
>
> It seems you can install graphicsmagick along with imagemagick, if the
> imagemagick USE flag ist not set.
That’s what came to my mind also while I was reading Francisco’s first answer.
Rebuilding with
Frank Steinmetzger writes:
a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape,
> Frescobaldi and some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at
> Octave, but this positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of
> imagemagick as far as I can tell and which conflicts with imagem
Hi again
Theese are my USE flags for both, probably the key is one of them, like,
perhaps, having graphicsmagick independent of imagemagick:
# emerge -pvD graphicsmagick imagemagick
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R] media-
Hi
Not sure how, but I have both installed. I recall having some
dificulties... Let me look for them
Francisco
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape, Frescobaldi
> and
> some LaTeX related stuff. I
Hello,
a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape, Frescobaldi and
some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at Octave, but this
positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of imagemagick as far as I can
tell and which conflicts with imagemagick.
Now some of the nam
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 17:04 -0500, Colleen Beamer wrote:
[..]
> > yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
>
> This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
> command. I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
> before. Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
28 Róbert Čerňanský wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
>> I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert
>> from one format to another (jpg to png, for example),
>> but I'm darned if I can find an executable to run the program.
>> There used
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:28:35 +0100
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
> > On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > > Hi Colleen,
> > >
> > > Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
> > >> Hi all,
> >
On Monday 28 Nov 2011 00:55:36 Colleen Beamer wrote:
> On 11/27/11 16:28, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
> >> On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> >>> Hi Colleen,
> >>>
> >>> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 sc
Colleen Beamer wrote:
Oh, yes, it was! :-) There used to be a command in /usr/bin named
imagemagick and if you launched it, it brought up an interface with
menus/buttons that you could click on. Granted, I haven't used it in
quite a while. However, I used to use it all the time to scale
On 11/27/11 16:28, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
>> On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
>>> Hi Colleen,
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
Hi all,
I used to use ImageMa
On 11/27/11 16:22, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Colleen Beamer
> wrote:
>> On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
>>> Hi Colleen,
>>> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
Does anyone have any experience with this?
>>>
>>> yes :) It
On 11/27/11 16:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
>> On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
>>> Hi Colleen,
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
Hi all,
I used to use ImageMa
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
> On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > Hi Colleen,
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from
> >
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Colleen Beamer
wrote:
> On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
>> Hi Colleen,
>> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
>>> Does anyone have any experience with this?
>>
>> yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
>
> This isn't quite what I
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
> On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > Hi Colleen,
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from
> >
On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> Hi Colleen,
>
> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from one
>> format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
>> on
Hi Colleen,
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
> Hi all,
>
> I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from one
> format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
> on my system (installed as requirement of something else), b
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Colleen Beamer
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from one
> format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
> on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
> darned if I c
Hi all,
I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from one
format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
darned if I can find an executable to run the program. There used to be
one in
I noticed a number of new gnome related packages dropping in all of a sudden
as a result of the new svg USE flag in imagemagick:
=
# emerge -uptDv world
These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Calculating world dependencies... done!
[nom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike wrote:
>> Bottom line: you need ~x86 libpng and imagemagick until libpng-1.2.12-r1
>> and imagemagick-6.2.8.0 are stabled.
>
> If you dont want to install the packages from testing you can compile
> imagemagick with the -png use flag set and it sh
> Bottom line: you need ~x86 libpng and imagemagick until libpng-1.2.12-r1
> and imagemagick-6.2.8.0 are stabled.
If you dont want to install the packages from testing you can compile
imagemagick with the -png use flag set and it should work. That's what I
did until imagemagick and/or libpng was u
if /bin/sh ./libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I./magick -I./wand
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -O2 -march=pentium4
-pipe -Wall -pthread -MT coders/coders_png_la-png.lo -MD -MP -MF
"coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo" -c -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Tandy wrote:
> gentuxx wrote:
> revdep-rebuild tells me that I need to remerge ImageMagick, but then
> fails during the remerge. This is the error I get:
>
> libxml2 -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -pthread -MT
> coders/coders_png
gentuxx wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
revdep-rebuild tells me that I need to remerge ImageMagick, but then
fails during the remerge. This is the error I get:
libxml2 -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -pthread -MT
coders/coders_png_la-png.lo -MD -MP -MF
"cod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
revdep-rebuild tells me that I need to remerge ImageMagick, but then
fails during the remerge. This is the error I get:
libxml2 -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -pthread -MT
coders/coders_png_la-png.lo -MD -MP -MF
"coders/.deps/coders_
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Fr?d?ric Grosshans wrote
> Le vendredi 10 f?vrier 2006 ? 02:25 -0500, Walter Dnes a ?crit :
> > The latest unstable builds complain about not finding libMagick.so.6.
>
> More or less random guess :
> did you revdep-rebuild ?
Yes. Neither "revde
Le vendredi 10 février 2006 à 02:25 -0500, Walter Dnes a écrit :
> The latest unstable builds complain about not finding libMagick.so.6.
More or less random guess :
did you revdep-rebuild ?
Fred
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I've found a couple of ways to use ImageMagick's "convert" utility
to salvage underexposed digital photos. Both methods preferentially
boost the brightness of darker pixels, so that dark areas are boosted,
without blowing out brighter areas. My problem is that the latest
stable builds (6.2.2.5
Martins Steinbergs wrote:
>On Friday 03 February 2006 09:51, John Green wrote:
>
>
>>convert input.jpg -contrast-stretch 10% output.jpg
>>
>>
>
>my installation is working with this
>
>media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.6.0 USE="X jpeg mpeg perl png tiff truetype xml2
>zlib -bzip2 -doc -fpx -graphv
John Green wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ImageMagick option -contrast-stretch is not recognised
> in my installation (6.2.5 01/31/06 Q16). The option is documented on the
> convert input.jpg -contrast-stretch 10% output.jpg
Seems to work.
[09:06:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp] $ convert input.jpg -contrast-
On Friday 03 February 2006 09:51, John Green wrote:
> convert input.jpg -contrast-stretch 10% output.jpg
my installation is working with this
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.6.0 USE="X jpeg mpeg perl png tiff truetype xml2
zlib -bzip2 -doc -fpx -graphviz -gs -jbig -lcms -nocxx -wmf"
m
--
Linux 2.6
Hi,
The ImageMagick option -contrast-stretch is not recognised
in my installation (6.2.5 01/31/06 Q16). The option is documented on the
IM web-site.
If the option exists on your installationi, or you have any insights,
please reply here with your version, so I can decide whether and
where to fi
55 matches
Mail list logo
