On 11/27/11 16:22, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Colleen Beamer
> <colleen.bea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
>>> Hi Colleen,
>>> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
>>>> Does anyone have any experience with this?
>>>
>>> yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
>>
>> This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the command. I
>> was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had before. Please don't
>> tell me they took a great little program and screwed it up! :-)
>
> A GUI interface specifically for imagemagick is news to me;
> imagemagick has always been a cli program. I don't see any reference
> to a GUI among its USE flags, either. Perhaps you were using some
> other program which acted as a front-end? Have you done a --depclean
> which may have removed that?
>
> Incidentally, if you want to retain a package, you really should
> select it for your @world set; otherwise, a depclean could pull it out
> from under you.
>
Haven't done a depclean.  This is a reasonable new computer.  Haven't
used ImageMagick in quite a while (way before I got this new computer)
and granted, it wasn't a gui that automatically got added to your kmenu,
but I created an icon for and for the command, I used
/usr/bin/imagemagick.  I recall at one point that if I used the command
imagemagick, it would launch some other interface (can't remember which
one) and I had to create a symlink named magick which linked to
/usr/bin/imagemagick.  I have tons of graphics that I resized and
converted to png from jpegs, but unfortunately, the don't say that I
used imagemagick to alter them.

-- 

Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org

Reply via email to