Hi Gordon,
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 23:37:39 -0600 Gordon Pettey wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>> Andreas K. Huettel posted on Thu, 11 Jan 2018 02:12:47 +0100 as
>> excerpted:
>>> Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2018, 18:16:33 CET schrieb Vincent-Xavier
>>> JU
On 11/01/18 03:18, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi MJ,
>
> "M. J. Everitt" writes:
>
>> Not entirely as a #gentoo-nit-pick .. I'm slightly unclear on the
>> different between 2.6.16+ and 2.6.32+ .. should this potentially be
>> 2.16.16-32 perhaps [2.6.16~32 even] or is this more obvious only to me,
>> and mo
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:03:54 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 08:55:11AM +0100, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> Seems we're turning into an elitist club or something...
>
>Elitist seems too kind a word. Knee-jerk reaction, petty vendetta,
>impulsive emotional reaction comes to mind - in
On 11/01/2018 08:43, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> I always was under the impression the following order (and explanation)
> was the case:
>
> stable -> development -> experimental
>
> For this reason, e.g. Prefix profiles are (still) experimental, which
> means they really shouldn't bother non-Prefix
Dnia 11 stycznia 2018 08:43:32 CET, Fabian Groffen
napisał(a):
>On 07-01-2018 21:25:28 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
>> I'd like to follow this with a more precise proposal. Namely,
>redefine
>> the current profile statuses to apply the following:
>>
>> a. stable -> fully tested, all depgraph break
January 11, 2018 9:52 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 11/01/2018 08:43, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
>> I always was under the impression the following order (and explanation)
>> was the case:
>>
>> stable -> development -> experimental
>>
>> For this reason, e.g. Prefix profiles are (still) ex
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 20:00 -0500, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On 2018-01-10 22:53, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:48:32 -0500
> > "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
> > > Modified a bit. This should show for anyone who has GnuCash
> > > installed.
> >
> > For anyone who has any version o
On 2018.01.11 01:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > Does being 'struck off' the list in this way apply to devs,
> including
> > Council and comrel members?
>
> So far noone has even considered "striking" devs off the list. If this
> even
> were to happen ever, it would have to be backed by a full
W dniu nie, 07.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶25 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny
napisał:
> W dniu sob, 06.01.2018 o godzinie 12∶10 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny
> napisał:
> > So I'm thinking of an alternate idea: to start adding staging warnings
> > for additional profile class, combined with arch restric
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi MJ,
>
> "M. J. Everitt" writes:
>
>> Not entirely as a #gentoo-nit-pick .. I'm slightly unclear on the
>> different between 2.6.16+ and 2.6.32+ .. should this potentially be
>> 2.16.16-32 perhaps [2.6.16~32 even] or is this more obvious only to
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> I guess you should have voiced your opinion back when discussion was
> taking place instead of being hostile *now* because the Council listened
> to what the developers requested.
>
> And if you are curious, then I've been asked by multiple de
This time with a version constrain that should allow this to expire at
some point in the future.
Title: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change
Author: Aaron W. Swenson
Posted: 2018-01-11
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/releases/tag/2.7.0a
Title: Gn
Michał Górny schrieb:
I guess you should have voiced your opinion back when discussion was
taking place instead of being hostile *now* because the Council listened
to what the developers requested.
The arguments why these posting restrictions are a pretty bad idea have
all been voiced back the
Maybe this is a discussion for -project, then?
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> a few outside trolls who
> * keep pushing their personal agenda in endless threads,
> * confuse their own inability to contribute with being a mistreated underdog,
> * and keep commenting opinionated on technical things th
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Maybe this is a discussion for -project, then?
>
Getting these kinds of non-technical discussions off of -dev is most
of the point of this. The purpose of this list is discussion of
things like eclass changes, fixing bugs, and so on. It is
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018, at 11:34 CST, Rich Freeman wrote:
> It is kind of hard to get new people interested in fixing bugs when
> half the traffic is complaining because the people doing the work
> aren't doing it in a way that makes the people not doing the work feel
> important.
++
2018-01-11 17:27 GMT+01:00 Aaron W. Swenson :
> This time with a version constrain that should allow this to expire at
> some point in the future.
>
> Title: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change
> Author: Aaron W. Swenson
> Posted: 2018-01-11
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 2.0
> Display-If-Installed:
Lower those of dev profiles that currently have broken depgraph to exp
status. This will allow us to enable CI runs for dev profiles without
triggering new issues, and start actively pursing improving exp
profiles to dev one by one.
---
profiles/profiles.desc | 104
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:22:17PM +0900, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Andreas K. Huettel" writes:
>
> > If, as a non-developer, you want to participate in a discussion on
> > gentoo-dev,
> > - either reply directly to the author of a list mail and ask him/her to
> > forward your message,
>
>
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> # ARM64 Profiles
> -arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0 dev
> +arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0 exp
> arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0/desktop exp
> -arm64
W dniu czw, 11.01.2018 o godzinie 22∶17 +0200, użytkownik Mart Raudsepp
napisał:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > # ARM64 Profiles
> > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0dev
> > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 22:17 +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > # ARM64 Profiles
> > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0
> > dev
> > +arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0
> > exp
> > arm64
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:27 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu czw, 11.01.2018 o godzinie 22∶17 +0200, użytkownik Mart
> Raudsepp
> napisał:
> > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > # ARM64 Profiles
> > > -arm64 default/linux/arm64/13.0
>
W dniu czw, 11.01.2018 o godzinie 22∶30 +0200, użytkownik Mart Raudsepp
napisał:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:27 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > W dniu czw, 11.01.2018 o godzinie 22∶17 +0200, użytkownik Mart
> > Raudsepp
> > napisał:
> > > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:45 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > >
---
profiles/profiles.desc | 80 +-
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/profiles/profiles.desc b/profiles/profiles.desc
index 4e3223a76b14..13cb5d0922c0 100644
--- a/profiles/profiles.desc
+++ b/profiles/profiles.desc
@@ -
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:35 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> The point of dev is to bring staging warnings so that we can improve
> the depgraph. If you really insist, we can start with dev status for
> arm64 & mips. But it'd be more readable if we worked on only one arch
> simultaneously.
Keep 17.0 o
On 1/11/18 2:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Lower those of dev profiles that currently have broken depgraph to exp
> status. This will allow us to enable CI runs for dev profiles without
> triggering new issues, and start actively pursing improving exp
> profiles to dev one by one.
> ---
> profiles/
On 2018-01-11 19:02, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> It could be wise to close GnuCash before backup
Good point. Added a line.
> also the choice of creating a copy of the database is a bit unusual,
> an offline backup may be more appropriated, example for mysql:
> mysqldump gnucash_db | xz > gnucash-2.6
W dniu czw, 11.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶40 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny
napisał:
> ---
> profiles/profiles.desc | 80
> +-
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/profiles/profiles.desc b/profiles/profiles.desc
> index 4
Revision number 4.
Title: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change
Author: Aaron W. Swenson
Posted: 2018-01-11
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: gnucash-2.6.sql.xz
For PostgreSQL:
$ pg_dump -U gnucash_user -Z 5 gnucash_db > gnucash-2.6.sql.gz
For SQLite:
$ cp /path/to/sqlite.file.gnu
On 1/11/18 4:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> I withdraw this since everyone obviously has his special workflow and we
> can't touch anything. Now the CI report is 3.5M large and lists over 900
> broken packages. Please start looking into fixing your profiles. Thank
> you.
>
Now that you explained
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Aaron W Swenson wrote:
> 2018-01-11-GnuCash-Breaking-Change.en.txt
Since its last update, GLEP 42 strongly recommends using a very short
name, with at most 20 characters for the short-name identifier [1]
(whose main purpose is to keep the name unique if more than one ne
32 matches
Mail list logo
