On 11/01/2018 08:43, Fabian Groffen wrote: > I always was under the impression the following order (and explanation) > was the case: > > stable -> development -> experimental > > For this reason, e.g. Prefix profiles are (still) experimental, which > means they really shouldn't bother non-Prefix people. Prefix users and > developers work on an environment where those profiles are promoted to > development ones, such that repoman kicks in for their work. (At least > that was the idea.) > > I see you (re-)define dev as "developer's playground", and I wonder if > in that case it wouldn't be better to introduce a new one instead? > > Maybe I'm just one of a few who thinks the order is reversed now.
The stable -> dev -> exp order also feels more natural to me. I don't have a strong opinion on this though. Paweł