Dnia 11 stycznia 2018 08:43:32 CET, Fabian Groffen <grob...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): >On 07-01-2018 21:25:28 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >> I'd like to follow this with a more precise proposal. Namely, >redefine >> the current profile statuses to apply the following: >> >> a. stable -> fully tested, all depgraph breakages are errors, >> >> b. exp -> fully tested, all depgraph breakages are warnings, >> >> c. dev -> developer's playground, not tested. > >I always was under the impression the following order (and explanation) >was the case: > >stable -> development -> experimental > >For this reason, e.g. Prefix profiles are (still) experimental, which >means they really shouldn't bother non-Prefix people. Prefix users and >developers work on an environment where those profiles are promoted to >development ones, such that repoman kicks in for their work. (At least >that was the idea.) > >I see you (re-)define dev as "developer's playground", and I wonder if >in that case it wouldn't be better to introduce a new one instead? > >Maybe I'm just one of a few who thinks the order is reversed now.
Ulrich has pointed out good enough proof that the ordering should be as you say, so I'll correct my proposal. > >Thanks, >Fabian -- Best regards, Michał Górny (by phone)
