[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: net-misc/sobby, net-libs/obby, net-libs/libinfinity, net-libs/net6

2018-11-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi everyone, the following packages are up for grabs since I have no use for them anymore: net-misc/sobby net-libs/obby net-libs/libinfinity net-libs/net6 They are unfortunately not up-to-date, and 3 minor bugs are open for net-libs/libinfinity: https://bugs.gentoo.org/527158 https://bugs.gento

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-nds/gosa-* packages

2018-11-21 Thread Tiziano Müller
# Tiziano Müller (21 Nov 2018) # Project is in maintenance-only mode with the last big release in 2012. # Needs a dedicated maintainer with a matching LDAP setup (extra schemas required). # Several open issues (#370985, #356827, #399845, #544562, #651092) and one security # bug (bug #66912

Re: [gentoo-dev] Hardening a default profile

2017-06-15 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi Michael Am 11.06.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Michael Brinkman: > Hello, so I've been running Gentoo Hardened for a few years on my > laptop, my desktop, and a server made from an older desktop. > > Because of Grsecurity closing access to its source to non-subscribers, > I decided that I would just

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/amara

2014-08-11 Thread Tiziano Müller
# Tiziano Müller (10 Aug 2014) # Bundles an old (2.0.0) and vulnerable, but modified version of expat. # Testsuite is completely broken and upstream seems to be working on the # next rewrite instead of fixing this one. Nothing in the tree depends on it. # Removal in a month. dev-python/amara

Re: [gentoo-dev] Akamai secure memory allocator for OpenSSL?

2014-04-14 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am 13.04.2014 22:42, schrieb Joshua Kinard: > So one of the side-discussions happening after Heartbleed was the fact that > OpenSSL has its own memory allocator code that effectively mitigates any C > library-provided exploit mitigations (as discussed on the openbsd-misc ML at > [1] and Ted Unangst

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 30.08.2013, 07:35 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > >>>>> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > good point, will go for ADAPTEC then instead > > > Plea

Re: [gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 29.08.2013, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > >>>>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based > > controllers) to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory > &g

[gentoo-dev] New license: Adaptec

2013-08-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
I would like to add arcconf (binary to manage aacraid-based controllers) to the tree, which is protected by a mandatory clickthrough witch the attached text. The license would be named "Adaptec" and added to the NON-FREE license group. Objections? ADAPTEC, INC. DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE LICENSE This

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Samstag, den 25.05.2013, 15:53 -0400 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: > On 05/25/2013 02:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > >> But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then > >

[gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPANDs for uWSGI: UWSGI_LANGUAGES, UWSGI_PLUGINS and plans for uwsgi-2

2013-04-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
Hi everyone, the new versions of uwsgi (1.9+) support even more languages/platforms and plugins. Currently we do everything with common USE flags and build-in many plugins since we didn't want to expose them right from the start to the user (the selection is based on upstreams base configuration)

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-libs/dv{acm4,net,ssl,thread,util}

2013-03-21 Thread Tiziano Müller
# Tiziano Müller (21 Mar 2013) # Masked for removal in 30 days (bug #462590). Open bugs: # #310217, #339477, #343807, #439110 # Recent test failures in dvutil show bugs in timezone handling. # No new release since >3 years, upstream is not responding. # Not recommended for new development. Us

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 17.12.2012, 11:19 +0100 schrieb Tomáš Chvátal: > Currently we put portage into /usr/portage and all related stuff is to > be in the subfolders there (distfiles, binpkg). > > I've always myself override these defaults in make.conf to point for > /var/portage/ (not /var/lib because I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dropping slotted boost

2012-10-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 22:48 -0700 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: > On 30/10/2012 22:44, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > I agree. It really doesn't make sense to keep unbuildable stuff in the > > tree. The point of slotting it in the first place was also to force a > > rebui

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dropping slotted boost

2012-10-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 11:30 -0700 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò: > Given the amount of headaches that Boost seems to give us all, now > thanks to the recent changes even more because Gentoo's boost is > different from all others and no upstream default check seem to work > correctly with it, I'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost.

2012-08-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 09:43 +0200 schrieb hasufell: > On 08/28/2012 06:26 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > > > There needs to be a way to specify maximal accepted slot of Boost. > > Examples of some possibilities: * BOOST_MAX_SLOT="1.49" global > > variable * '--max 1.49'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] boost-utils.eclass -- for building against newest boost.

2012-08-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Michał Górny: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > > 2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a): > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass > > > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > > > +# Copyri

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: app-admin/eselect-boost & Boost plans

2012-08-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Some of you may have already noticed, that boost >=1.50.0-r1 does not pull in eselect-boost anymore and does not install a profile for it either. This is on purpose since app-admin/eselect-boost will be removed. Why: the purpose of eselect-boost was to make the introduction of slotted-boost easier

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch

2012-08-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Samstag, den 18.08.2012, 01:44 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On Saturday 18 August 2012 01:16:29 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > - everything depending on boost (current 1.49 won't work, you need > > 1.50, and quite a few things break with 1.50); > > there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: net-fs/mount-cifs

2012-07-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
# Tiziano Müller (24 Jul 2012) # Now part of net-fs/cifs-utils & unmaintained by upstream # Security bug #308067 and bugs #427702, #232608, #247809, # #258409, #265183, #337691, #342783, #279074 # Removal in 30 days net-fs/mount-cifs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-03-31 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Samstag, den 31.03.2012, 14:44 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Maciej Grela wrote: > > > I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable > > is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not. > > There is no such stage. You mean pkg_pretend, I s

Re: [gentoo-dev] latest boost vs. eselected boost

2012-01-19 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 19.01.2012, 11:50 -0500 schrieb Ian Stakenvicius: > On 19/01/12 03:27 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > On 1/19/12 9:05 AM, Johannes Huber wrote: > >> Summary of the comments: 1) Ebuilds should always pick the latest > >> boost version. 2) Boost should be compared to gcc, python

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
se-depend on itself. > Good to know. No, not good. It doesn't make any sense. We will have a solution for such cases somewhere in the future, but at the moment you should just display a warning that even though the user specified more than one db only is going to be used. Cheers, Tiziano --

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries

2010-04-05 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 05.04.2010, 08:16 +0200 schrieb Maciej Mrozowski: > On Sunday 04 of April 2010 17:33:17 Tiziano Müller wrote: > > >> Besides I > >> can already imagine PMS-related discussion regarding "make the PMs check > for rdeps per default before un

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries

2010-04-05 Thread Tiziano Müller
t help since you may have the same problems some people try to solve in this thread. > This however breaks down > a bit when the ABI change is in reverse of normal versioning. How so? Such a var should just specify the ABI and the PM only has to check whether it changed from one PVR to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries

2010-04-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
wards you can > > use chrpath to set it to the correct location. Will get messy with the > > vdb though, but if Portage's doing it, it can probably be dealt with. > Sounds messy indeed, what about hardened/SELinux/AppArmor/whatever - do they > allow such DT_RPATH operations?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?

2010-04-03 Thread Tiziano Müller
t; disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: Yes, please remove it. Keep it simple and stupid. LATER means it's not resolved and is as such not a valid resolution. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadm

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries

2010-04-03 Thread Tiziano Müller
ngs. Slot libraries where needed, slot dep operators (EAPI 4) will help. And if that doesn't work out we need a separate var to give the PM a hint when API/ABI breakages happen (such that the PM knows when to re-install the rev deps). -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add NGINX_MODULES to USE_EXPAND

2010-03-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
k. > > Thanks, > Bene > -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Making repoman/metagen check for validity of herds

2010-02-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
. > > Does anyone feel like getting his hands on that or like teaming up on it? Since the value for is a distinct set of values it could be easily done using a xsd or relax-ng schema plus XIncludes. See http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/metadata/ for my earlier experiments. -- Tiz

Re: [gentoo-dev] Build system output verbosity, e.g. cmake

2010-02-22 Thread Tiziano Müller
set to get the full output is easier for the user and therefore a good thing. Leave the output mangling to the package manager. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Tiziano Müller
the $tarball -> $PV pass). > If I remember correctly debian has something like that for version > tracking, so it may be worth having a look. > > Alexis. > > [1] http://dante.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/catalogue.html > [2] http://texcatalogue.sarovar.org/ -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 20:16 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov: > В Чтв, 04/02/2010 в 22:37 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет: > > The upstream tags are meant as a way to track information about > > - id of a hosting or indexing site (automated version bump checks) > > Does there

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 22:37 +0100 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > While some people already discovered the upstream metadata tags, there > are only 8 ebuilds using them so far. Mostly I am to blame for that, > since I forgot to send out a proper announcement. While all the

[gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
name (example: aria2) - for type="sourceforge": the project name (example: liferea) - for type="cpan": the module name (example: Pod-Index) Regards, Tiziano [1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=4 [2]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3

2010-01-18 Thread Tiziano Müller
logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't > annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only > defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to > keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patch. > > Regards, &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Election for the Gentoo Council empty seat

2009-12-29 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 25.12.2009, 19:09 +0100 schrieb Tobias Scherbaum: > Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2009, 23:36 -0100 schrieb Jorge Manuel B. S. > Vicetto: > > nomination: December 17th to 30th > > I'd like to nominate dev-zero. And I accept, thanks. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo L

Re: [gentoo-dev] client/server consistency: USE flags / split packages

2009-11-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
ackages; use USE flags and USE deps. > 2. stop using minimal USE flag to build client or sever only. > > > So are there any good reasons to split packages? In environments with a staging server and binary packages, yes. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman-global.txt, repositories.xml, layman, overlays.gentoo.org

2009-10-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
le specifies the respective dtd/xsd/relaxng you know exactly how to validate (and parse) it and may apply a xsl-trafo if necessary to convert it to a new format on the fly. As long as you keep using xml you can then change the complete format in a new schema version. -- Tiziano Müller Gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman-global.txt, repositories.xml, layman, overlays.gentoo.org

2009-10-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
rule of thumb is: use attributes for values with predefined contents, use elements otherwise. So, make "name" an element please. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org Gnu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman-global.txt, repositories.xml, layman, overlays.gentoo.org

2009-09-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
= What is the reason that "name" is an attribute? While quality, status and type have a distinct set of allowed values, name doesn't and I'd therefore set it as an element instead. How about adding an attribut

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

2009-08-22 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2009, 02:23 -0400 schrieb Andrew D Kirch: > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > As you can see currently, most time is needed to implemente the features > > in portage. It therefore doesn't make sense to make the EAPI process > > even faster. On the other h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

2009-08-21 Thread Tiziano Müller
nd voted on by the council? As you can see currently, most time is needed to implemente the features in portage. It therefore doesn't make sense to make the EAPI process even faster. On the other hand, I think it would make sense to have a separate group developing new EAPIs instead of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Make 10.0 profiles EAPI-2 'compliant'

2009-08-13 Thread Tiziano Müller
To avoid collision with the current package.mask I'd prefer package.mask.d/ for the directory. Also makes the transition easy since we can generate package.mask out of the files in package.mask.d/. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Py

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
ntoo you > would have tried your best to be good and nice in the... I dunno, 4 > years(?) since your ejection and then worked your way up to being a > developer again. > > Trying to get into Gentoo by proxy (heh, see what I did there?) is the > wrong way Please read m

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
ead my 'what if' above with that > > liability in mind. > > > > This is an interesting point that I doubt many here would have thought of. > > > 1. http://twitter.com/dberkholz/status/2345098446 -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Area

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 28.06.2009, 16:40 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2009.06.28 10:00, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 26.06.2009, 07:15 -0600 schrieb Denis Dupeyron: > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:46

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
would show the same averseness to some devs I had fights with in the past as people do to Ciaran I couldn't work with them now. > And experiments sometimes succeed, or sometimes they fail, > but they often teach you something. I wouldn't be as fast as you to > remove Tizian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 25

2009-06-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
e: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ > > > Attached is the preliminary meeting agenda. Agenda looks fine, thanks Thomas for taking it over but I simply didn't have time to do it before I left for my holidays. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Membe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [packagekit] Inviting you to project "PackageMap"

2009-06-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
t use a XML database like dbxml? Maybe you could just specify the XML files as storage and then dbxml would do the rest. > > > > XML might be > > useful for storing the data, but not for querying. > > Good point. Using XPath and XQuery you can do queries on XML as we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11

2009-06-10 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 21:00 -0500 schrieb Doug Goldstein: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & 4th > > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @ &

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 11

2009-06-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
PI development like feature-freeze, late feature removals (due to implementation problems). Eventually develop a lightweight EAPI development model. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Jun 11th, 2009 Council Meeting Format

2009-06-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
gt; the time to start reviewing candidates and seeing if they will do for > you in the coming year what you expect a council to do. > > If people like this, great. If people don't, then I can feel comforted > that I spoke my piece about what I want to see the council become and &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Jun 11th, 2009 Council Meeting Format

2009-06-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
we have not > > been doing this for the past several weeks. > > Vigorous debate fails no one. Religious zealotry however fails us all. > In recognizing that this is what's happening iwth EAPI-3, and GLEP's > 54/55 is the first step towards moving on to a new and fair de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 22:29 +0200 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > The people I'd like to nominate: > > - dertobi123 ... for his solid comments, experience, common sense, > reliability > - halcy0n ... even though he had to resign early I hope he finds time > again to run for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 01.06.2009, 12:17 +0200 schrieb Tobias Scherbaum: > And here we go, these are the ones I'd like to nominate: > > * dev-zero, well because ... i'd like him to be on the council again! And I accept the nomination, thank you. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Develo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-06-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 20:55 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2009.05.27 13:46, Ferris McCormick wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:57 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > This is your friendly reminder! Same

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
omment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkojWCIACgkQcAWygvVEyAKcBQCgi7CbK2zTX8y/FqDvTUfsN2l4 > ig4AoI6cI1m8dlTXRKtfYyTUfGBMvhZC > =72eQ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibilit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-05-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 28.05.2009, 09:23 +0200 schrieb Patrick Lauer: > On Thursday 28 May 2009 07:46:36 Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > And here is why (I'm only looking at the non-degenerated case with valid > > metadata, ignoring overlays which some consider a corner case (I do

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 54 and hyphens in PV

2009-05-28 Thread Tiziano Müller
hing? > > With our current versioning scheme the rule is very simple: ${P} is > split into ${PN} and ${PV} at the last hyphen. This can be done in a > straight forward way by regexp matching, and I would really hate to > lose this nice property. I don't understand why this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-05-27 Thread Tiziano Müller
files: ~50ms 5541 files: ~170ms Reading from cold cache: 1507 files: ~2.8s 5541 files: ~6s I made a lot of assumptions here (neglecting seek between ebuild-dir and metadata-dir, other processes using the drive, 80 ebuilds from overlays where the ebuild would have to be read, etc.). But estimatin

Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
o repeat myself: herds can already been seen as tags. So, my proposal still stands: change the current herds into teams and write them in metadata.xml as such: cpp and then using as tags. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, Postgre

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google SoC @ Gentoo - Universal Select Tool

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
ll can understand, I won't be having the time to > read through all eselect-* modules and *-config utilities code. > > Please drop me a line here or at freenode if you have anything to add to > these ideas or have any further ideas that can help me on this project. > Thank y

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
elopment model. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 signature.asc Description: Dies i

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLSA-2, a new DTD for GLSAs

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
e specified slot. The default > is '*' meaning all slots. [1] I don't think this is really a good idea since the version may or may not be tied to a slot (at the moment it is in most cases I know). Looks good so far. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council M

Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?

2009-05-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
at happens when the Universal Select Tool gets released/used. Possible alternative: app-select? -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-05-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
ng is ultimately visible for a c/p-v. > > I know. > > > > > -- > > Ciaran McCreesh > > > > I am wondering if enabling @overlay postfix support could be just restricted > to command line arguments, at least for the beginning. And then it's a pm thing. So

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI Changes

2009-05-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 17.05.2009, 11:11 -0600 schrieb Ryan Hill: > On Fri, 15 May 2009 23:31:25 +0200 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > Wrong. For example: > > - stuff like docompress may change the content being installed depending > > on the package manager > > - --disa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The fallacies of GLEP55

2009-05-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
st > starting at the best version and working downwards until it finds > something usable, which is a pretty hefty price to pay. > ... if the cache can be parsed at all. With GLEP-55 we might even choose to change the cache format. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI Changes

2009-05-15 Thread Tiziano Müller
Do we want to document the following? (do we have already?) - When is it allowed to use an EAPI in the tree (given as offset to the release of portage supporting that eapi) - When is it allowed to use an EAPI in the stable tree (given as offset of when a portage version supporting that EAPI

Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-1/libusb-compat landing - testing and DEPEND changes needed

2009-05-15 Thread Tiziano Müller
1.4.2.ebuild > sys-apps/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite-1.4.4.ebuild > sys-apps/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite-1.4.99.ebuild > sys-apps/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite-1.5.2.ebuild > sys-apps/pcsc-lite/pcsc-lite-1.5.3.ebuild > sys-apps/usb_modeswitch/usb_modeswitch-0.9.4.ebuild > sys-apps/usbutils/usbutils-0.73.ebuild &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 14

2009-05-06 Thread Tiziano Müller
Updated meeting agenda can be found here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/council/meeting-agenda-20090514.txt Changes: - Added the issue of removing old eclasses to the list. Cheers, Tiziano Am Sonntag, den 03.05.2009, 23:47 +0200 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > This is your friendly reminder! S

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 14

2009-05-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
d 4th Thursday of each month. This is > announced in every meeting email. > > Of course there are occasional exceptions, but they are exceptions and > not the rule. I don't see why this would be one because I haven't heard > anything about next week being bad. Well

Re: [gentoo-dev] Retiring

2009-05-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
and reduce breakages at user-side which hopefully reduces the amount of bugs reported because of such breakages and keep our users happy and happy users are more likely to contribute or become devs when they see some progress. But you're right, we have to find the balance somehow... -- Tiz

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 7

2009-05-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 00:25 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2009.05.03 22:47, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & > > 4th > > Thursdays at 2000

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 7

2009-05-03 Thread Tiziano Müller
s (due to implementation problems). Eventually develop a lightweight EAPI development model. Cheers, Tiziano -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23

2009-04-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 23:21 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 15:27 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 15:17 Fri 17 Apr , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote > > > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail f

Re: [gentoo-dev] PROFILE-IUSE-INJECTION implicit things (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-20 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 20.04.2009, 13:41 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > Let's see if we can keep to one thread per item here. > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:14:00 +0200 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > * PROFILE-IUSE-INJECTION > > yes, but *_IMPLICIT has to be discussed. &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready

2009-04-19 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 12.04.2009, 20:59 +0100 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > I've got the EAPI 3 branch for PMS more or less ready: > > http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 > > The provisional included feature list is everything that was ready > before the deadline. Thanks a lot for your work. Sor

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 13:13 -0400 schrieb Richard Freeman: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > Most packages that have tests have working tests. For those that don't, > > the tests have to be restricted. All this proposal does is ensures that > > that happens in a progressive, incremental an

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-3 draft: slot operator support

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 23:36 +0530 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > roughly 90% packages depending on one of: > > > > sys-libs/db > > Why the hell does this have so many slots in-tree? I am unaware of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-3 draft: slot operator support

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 12:03 +0200 schrieb Rémi Cardona: > Mart Raudsepp a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > > > This thread is for any discussion about the slot operator support item > > in EAPI-3 draft. > > Could anyone actually give a good reason for slot operators? What > packages would ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-3 draft: slot operator support

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 05:25 +0300 schrieb Mart Raudsepp: > Hello, > > > This thread is for any discussion about the slot operator support item > in EAPI-3 draft. > > The premise is good what := and :* allow for, but I'm concerned about > the syntax possibly ending up being suboptimal in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-04-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 04:51 +0300 schrieb Mart Raudsepp: > Hello, > > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 08:49 +0100, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of > > new > > problems. One of them are the use dep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Real multilib support for Gentoo

2009-04-05 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 05.04.2009, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Thomas Sachau: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > > On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:59:22 Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support > >> within our tree and package managers. From what i know, there are main

Re: [gentoo-dev] Preserving mtimes for EAPI3

2009-03-30 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 30.03.2009, 18:05 +0200 schrieb Peter Alfredsen: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:40:14 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > No, an EAPI bump is necessary. Older (post-EAPI) Portage versions do > > something different, so any ebuild relying upon particular behaviour > > is already broken.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 26.03.2009, 19:12 +0100 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 12:25 Mon 23 Mar , Robert Buchholz wrote: > > On Monday 23 March 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > Spec needed. DOCS or no DOCS? > > > > DOCS, and non-empty default value, please [1]. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:23 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > 9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) ) > > > > What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure. > > The replacement is to write the deps out correctl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:26 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:37 +0100 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > 8) EAPI 3 requires doins support for symlinks > > > > Current behaviour is to copy the file the symlink points to, right? > > N

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: genstef gems special edition

2009-03-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 23:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Alfredsen: > Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd > send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs. > This list contains all ebuilds that have no herd, at least one open bug > and where

Re: [gentoo-dev] newins "-" for standard input?

2009-03-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 09:22 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of > "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first > argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the > following are obvious: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for March 26

2009-03-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 22.03.2009, 20:38 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote > > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev > > list to see. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 00:22 +0100 schrieb Tiziano Müller: > Btw, I put up a document explaining the changes in some detail here: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/docs/EAPI3.{rst,html} > (including references to bugs if any, etc.) > It is completely based on the spreadsheet we

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 09:05 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Peter Volkov wrote: > > > Probably this is not best implementation, but it describes idea > > well. If failures are non fatal I don't object to having src_test > > enabled by default and I'll all for this

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 07:47 +0100 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > >>>>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > You forgot to mentioned that we probably also want that > > default_src_configure/src_compile die when they try to `cd` to an > > in

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-16 Thread Tiziano Müller
Thanks a lot for your work. Am Montag, den 16.03.2009, 20:47 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > I've got a very rough draft of what EAPI 3 might end up looking like, > based upon discussion: > > http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 > > Note that I will probably rebase and modifying the b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-13 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 13.03.2009, 20:11 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: > On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:49:16 +0100 > Tiziano Müller wrote: > > So I think it's time for a short eapi bump with some distinct > > improvements: > > Some more small candidates to discuss: > > *

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 23:31 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 21:22 Sun 08 Mar , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 23:35 Sun 08 Mar , Tiziano Müller wrote: > > > Well, the point I'm trying to make here is a different one: The syntax > > > you pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-09 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 09.03.2009, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Christian Faulhammer: > Hi, > > Daniel Pielmeier : > > > 2009/3/9 Christian Faulhammer : > > > > > > I don't know if there is a bug somewhere (I did not find one), but > > > what about having the possibility to ask for one out many USE flags > > > o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-08 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 15:16 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 19:27 Sun 08 Mar , Tiziano Müller wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 10:01 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > > > It would just eliminate all but one call to use_with(). Depending on how > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-08 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Sonntag, den 08.03.2009, 11:24 -0700 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: > On 10:01 Sun 08 Mar , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 16:48 Sun 08 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 09:42:29 -0700 > > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > > - I understand the reasoning for the SRC_CONFIGURE_W

  1   2   3   >