Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2009, 23:55 -0600 schrieb Ryan Hill: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200 > > Tomáš Chvátal <scarab...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already > > > handles it right). > > > > That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to propose > > it for EAPI 4 if you want that. > > Why is that (seriously curious, not disagreeing)? Portage has supported this > for quite a while now. Does the current PMS disallow it? > > What I've really wanted for a long time is different package.mask files for > different types of masks. eg. > > package.mask/broken.mask (qa.mask?) > package.mask/removal.mask > package.mask/security.mask > package.mask/testing.mask
To avoid collision with the current package.mask I'd prefer package.mask.d/ for the directory. Also makes the transition easy since we can generate package.mask out of the files in package.mask.d/. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
