Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 01:53 -0400 schrieb Andrew D Kirch: > Doug Goldstein wrote: > > All, > > > > The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for > > weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the > > senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54, > > GLEP55, and EAPI-3 without any real progress or sense coming of them. > > It's taken me a little bit to step up and put a stop to it but I fully > > intend on putting a stop to it. The point of the council meetings is > > to bring up a topic and decide on its merits whether it should be > > brought into the Gentoo Project or not. I quote from the first line of > > the Gentoo Council website: > I would strongly advice that EAPI-3 and GLEP's 54/55 be dropped at least > for the time being (at a minimum 90 days). The argument has left any > trappings of merit or rational behind, and has replaced them with > religion. As this is now a dogmatic issue a resolution cannot be > reached at this time. > > > > We have all collectively failed the Gentoo Project since we have not > > been doing this for the past several weeks. > > Vigorous debate fails no one. Religious zealotry however fails us all. > In recognizing that this is what's happening iwth EAPI-3, and GLEP's > 54/55 is the first step towards moving on to a new and fair debate on > these issues down the road.
Why are you mentioning EAPI-3 here? That topic got closed two meetings ago. -- Tiziano Müller Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor E-Mail : dev-z...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
