Re: [gentoo-dev] About testing applications

2007-03-18 Thread Simon Stelling
clutter up the home unnecessarily :) -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

2007-03-14 Thread Simon Stelling
d it works just great. I don't see why we have to dissect every word, especially since it makes it so easy to not to see the wood for the trees. The goal of the CoC is fairly vague ('getting along well'), so why is there a need to specify the way ulta-explicit? -- Kind Regard

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

2007-03-13 Thread Simon Stelling
re we always have a | consensus for whatever decision we reach. Who is "we" in this? I assume it's devrel, but I think it should be written out. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting

2007-03-04 Thread Simon Stelling
certain ones will flock to your side! | | Code listing 1.6: Usage of plurality | email: Stop wasting our time! [1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/docs/flame.html -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: Copyright, non-US devs and Gentoo Foundation vs Gentoo (Was: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting)

2007-03-03 Thread Simon Stelling
countries of the EU. ^ It's still Europe :P --' -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting

2007-03-03 Thread Simon Stelling
you can't say putting together version 2 of a spec before version 1 was writte is sane. So we need the EAPI=0 spec. Makes it pretty easy to figure out why this spec is fairly important. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting

2007-03-03 Thread Simon Stelling
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I find it amusing that no-one complaining about this has actually asked to see it. I think ferringb did, just not very successfully. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting

2007-03-03 Thread Simon Stelling
, which is why it is policy. Except that in many European countries you can't even "re-assign" your copyright. Oops. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] more up to date minimal install cd

2007-03-03 Thread Simon Stelling
Daniel Robbins wrote: And it should be one (web) page. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1 -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] more up to date minimal install cd

2007-03-01 Thread Simon Stelling
discuss it far and wide, as long as releng doesn't want to do it, nothing will happen. So maybe we should wait for a statement from Chris before doing anything else. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib-strict

2007-02-24 Thread Simon Stelling
William Hubbs wrote: Where do I find information on how to fix the package? If you don't have a box using a multilib profile (I guess the user who filed the bug was using an AMD64 box), you won't be able to reproduce it. Just reassign the bug to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we'll fix it :) Regards,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-22 Thread Simon Stelling
Simon Stelling wrote: [snip crap] Actually, ignore me, there's a fundamental flaw in my thinking. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance upon || ( use? ( ) ) behaviour

2007-02-22 Thread Simon Stelling
. Explain how ||() works with a "normal" dependency, explain how use? () dependencies work and it will become clear to everybody how it will work. TBH, it looks to me like you were to explain how an if statement in a while loop works, even though it is well-known how both of them work if they aren't nested. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass

2007-02-19 Thread Simon Stelling
Mike Frysinger wrote: replace that with: xargs -d $'\n' aye, that looks way better. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass

2007-02-19 Thread Simon Stelling
er. If some package really installs files with a newline character in its name, well, then that package is just not worth including in emul-packages. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass

2007-02-19 Thread Simon Stelling
gards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass

2007-02-19 Thread Simon Stelling
Simon Stelling wrote: I'll use cp -pPr. Actually -dpPR, which is what -a is an alias for. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass

2007-02-19 Thread Simon Stelling
and removes them again, which is both stupid and confusing. cp -a "${S}"/* "${D}"/ || die "copying files failed!" For future *BSD compatibility (yes i want to use the linux bsd emulation for flash, opera, etc) it's better to use rsync -a imho I'

[gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass

2007-02-19 Thread Simon Stelling
, -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer # Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ # # Original Author: Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Purpose: Providing a template for the app-emulation/emul

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-17 Thread Simon Stelling
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > * devmanual. Not converting it over to a new shiny XML thing or > whatever, but just extending and reworking the parts that need it. Last year's SoC FAQ said that the actual work would have to be coding, not writing documentation. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stel

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-08 Thread Simon Stelling
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Which is all very well, but not sufficient reason to screw up a project > that is developed and used by a lot of people. As if we were all gonna die without bash arrays in our config files. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Another council topic for Feb

2007-02-03 Thread Simon Stelling
marking stable? -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND - CAMERAS

2007-01-21 Thread Simon Stelling
Hi, This was discussed before, and noone was against it as it seems: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/44932/match=cameras+use+expand -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for projects...

2007-01-11 Thread Simon Stelling
I like the idea. Something really useful I could think of is *drums* the implementation of GLEP 42. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Some sync control

2007-01-11 Thread Simon Stelling
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: What do you think? I think it would be much nicer to have a VCS with support for atomic commits. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] deprecating /etc/make.profile

2007-01-10 Thread Simon Stelling
k up. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148388 -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Through the looking glass: Reflections on Gentoo

2007-01-08 Thread Simon Stelling
at being said, I hope that things change for the better. I doubt so, to be honest. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: making USE_EXPANDed variables incremental

2007-01-01 Thread Simon Stelling
nd Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Wrong dependencies to postgresql

2006-12-25 Thread Simon Stelling
oo worthy to be spent on such things. Thank you, and have a merry Christmas. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] CAMERAS as USE_EXPAND

2006-12-23 Thread Simon Stelling
USE_EXPAND. For any objections, suggestions for a better name, etc. please also see bug 139884: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139884 -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Simon Stelling
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: > Just for fun(=I wouldn't use it in ebuild/eclass): Sorry, but this mailing list is not really the best place for "just for fun" bash foo. I suggest you take it somewhere else. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: license group file format

2006-10-26 Thread Simon Stelling
Uhoh, forgive me for not reading the other replies before writing a completely redundant one. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: license group file format

2006-10-26 Thread Simon Stelling
le so called ini-style Uhm, what kind of metadata are we talking about here? Descriptions can just be placed in comments above the group specification line, no? -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing the metastructure (was: [Council] Summary of the last meeting)

2006-10-25 Thread Simon Stelling
yours. I don't mind the council touching the metastructure, as long as they do it right ;) If they don't, I will surely state so and ask for a referendum. If it turns out that like 60% of the devs don't share the council's opinion I'm sure they will re-think their decis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing the metastructure

2006-10-25 Thread Simon Stelling
Mike Frysinger wrote: (how do you measure the degree of a change ?) By the number of inflammatory mails it causes within the timeframe of two weekdays. Quite obvious, isn't it? ;) -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] implicit vs explicit dependencies

2006-10-23 Thread Simon Stelling
lking DEPEND, for which this is true: gtk was installed with a binpkg and those don't pull in their DEPENDs because the package is already built. For RDEPEND you can savely rely on implicit dependencies, in most cases at least. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Gentoo Commitfests

2006-10-23 Thread Simon Stelling
Alec Warner wrote: Haha, there are times when you need to realize that it's just joking around, versus an actual flamefest ;) This makes Gentoo look very unprofessional. It even makes us look like we're having fun. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer --

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Matti 'mabi' Bickel

2006-10-22 Thread Simon Stelling
s. Please give him a warm welcome! -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64 and ia64 keywords

2006-10-21 Thread Simon Stelling
nd IP27 are nearly identical as far as userland goes. > (and if we did everything right, they would be completely identical) > Now, if you said o32, n32, and n64 [x] You just made a fool of yourself. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Portage local package revisions

2006-10-21 Thread Simon Stelling
e the feature for their networks too, if they like it. The people who have to maintain the code that implements the feature should just give an ACK/NACK and go on or leave it, IMO. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64 and ia64 keywords

2006-10-21 Thread Simon Stelling
not rofl-worthy... -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: Recommended -march settings [was: Re: [gentoo-dev] CFLAGS paragraph submission for the GWN]

2006-10-14 Thread Simon Stelling
a list based on their input. Check out these packages [1] before doing that, they will probably supply all you need. [1] http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=cpuinfo -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] *plop*

2006-10-13 Thread Simon Stelling
Good luck with all the things you will be doing in future... You will be missed. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per-package default USE flags

2006-10-13 Thread Simon Stelling
this. It avoids another layer that seems just redundant. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: per-package default USE flags

2006-10-13 Thread Simon Stelling
. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Missing: Universal-CD - Gentoo discriminates shell and networkless users

2006-10-10 Thread Simon Stelling
;m not the only one who is using a pentium mmx as a router, so you better think twice about it :P -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Missing: Universal-CD - Gentoo discriminates shell and networkless users

2006-10-09 Thread Simon Stelling
g fast and convenient, so what exactly is the problem? It's not like you can't get Gentoo running without a network connection anymore. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Missing: Universal-CD - Gentoo discriminates shell and networkless users

2006-10-05 Thread Simon Stelling
bz2 > http://gentoo.osuosl.org/releases/mips/2006.1/stages/mips4/stage3-mips4-2006.1.tar.bz2 Stop being stupid please, you're only making fun of yourself. I guess I don't have to explain you how useful a URL is to a _networkless_ installation, do I? -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide

2006-10-04 Thread Simon Stelling
n't find anybody on the portage or pkgcore team saying that it would have been better to incorporate the ideas of pkgcore into portage. Sometimes it's simply better to start all over again. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide

2006-10-04 Thread Simon Stelling
anything. What we need is more people who do actual testing. If you're forced to be in an arch team you're just a tag in a project page, not more. This is not going to help at all, in fact it will only hide the problems even more. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD6

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-10-03 Thread Simon Stelling
-- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] New dev: dev-zero

2006-09-27 Thread Simon Stelling
couple of private customers. If I'm not working, I'm playing the violin or watching movies." With this addition, the Swiss conspiracy soon will be powerful enough to bribe everybody else with chocolate, so you better watch out. Everybody please give Tiziano a warm welcom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Jim Ramsay (lack)

2006-09-27 Thread Simon Stelling
First time I'm happy we're having the developer lack ;) Welcome Jim! -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Tristan Heaven (nyhm)

2006-09-26 Thread Simon Stelling
. In his free time he is mostly busy playing^W_testing_ games, so we can all be assured that any stablization requests filed by him have gone through a careful inquiry. Welcome Tristan! -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers

2006-09-22 Thread Simon Stelling
Peter wrote: > We can disagree on that point. All distros are businesses. Users are > customers. No users, no distro. I haven't received a single paycheck in two years. What a shitty business. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-22 Thread Simon Stelling
int. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] seeds, GLEPs, and projects

2006-09-21 Thread Simon Stelling
most important factor. Motivation is far more important IMO, and it's pretty hard to get the motivation together to test 60 packages instead of tinkering around with a new idea. At least for me it often is. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] seeds, GLEPs, and projects

2006-09-21 Thread Simon Stelling
ious answers.) -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC about another *DEPEND variable

2006-09-21 Thread Simon Stelling
thon/ghc abi issue. It was aimed more at cases like > mips with it's multiple abis. It's all about multilib and has (except for the unfortunate name) nothing to do with this issue. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited

2006-09-20 Thread Simon Stelling
Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: >> # Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (20 Sep 2006) >> # This license needs to be agreed on explicitly to be considered >> # legally binding. >> # By unmasking and installing the package you agree with its terms. >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited

2006-09-20 Thread Simon Stelling
Steev Klimaszewski wrote: > I think it is over engineering of a non-issue. Which non-issue in particular? -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited

2006-09-20 Thread Simon Stelling
Hello all, I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me. Thanks in advance! -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer GLEP: 52 Title: License Managment in Portage Version: $Revision: $ Last-Modified: $Date: $ Author: Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sunrise trusted committers with bugzilla access

2006-09-14 Thread Simon Stelling
ic > architecture. Just coding is their work, not testing - which explains the > difference in the name. Huh, I hope they will do testing :P -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

2006-09-12 Thread Simon Stelling
t the following: /etc/foobar/doh /etc/foo /etc/foobaz .. or did I misunderstand something here? I don't know whether that is the current behaviour of portage, but IMO it certainly shouldn't be. It should rather be /etc/foo (file) or, if /etc/foo is a dir: /etc/foo/* -- Kind Regar

Re: [gentoo-dev] colon separated variables in /etc/env.d/

2006-09-11 Thread Simon Stelling
wouldn't like it when my box is totally screwed just because PORTDIR doesn't point at my portage tree for the moment. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers

2006-09-07 Thread Simon Stelling
h things on -dev, because this is not a "hey everybody, look, $dev did something stupid!" list. It doesn't matter whether $dev is genstef or carlo or anybody else. The bitching ain't gonna stop if you just "give back". -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers

2006-09-07 Thread Simon Stelling
s the cause. The behaviour is correct. The depstring in question was "!=app-text/hunspell-1.0", just retarded) repoman would complain loudly. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: packages going into the tree with non-gentoo maintainers

2006-09-07 Thread Simon Stelling
ous or abrasive behavior to users or developers, or similar developer-specific behavioral problems should be brought directly to Developer Relations via [EMAIL PROTECTED] These should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis by Developer Relations and may require disciplinary action." -- Kind Re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-04 Thread Simon Stelling
Stefan Schweizer wrote: > it > is meant to be as non-concrete as possible to allow usage in as many cases > as possible. Which makes it pretty pointless. Really, this GLEP says almost nothing, it's simply too vague to express any intend. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/A

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The Age of the Universe

2006-09-03 Thread Simon Stelling
d to get and b) sucks. I'd rather have other people think Gentoo is a bad distro but be happy with it myself. Yes, I am a selfish pig. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The Age of the Universe

2006-09-02 Thread Simon Stelling
Edgar Hucek wrote: > I know my tools but not necessarly the normal user who wanna use gentoo > and is ending frustrated. If the users are too lazy to read the documentation, why should we care about them? -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The Age of the Universe

2006-09-02 Thread Simon Stelling
or GTK 2.x =x11-libs/gtk+-2* doc # disable mysql support for QT x11-libs/qt -mysql Know your tools, man. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: Globalness of some USE flags

2006-08-31 Thread Simon Stelling
ackage that doesn't share the effect: sys-apps/pcmciautils:udev - Install as an udev helper instead of a hotplug helper Which is different from the other 5 "Enable udev rules file installation". -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 39 compliance

2006-08-30 Thread Simon Stelling
tely unimportant whether you did the quizzes or not. IMO, at least. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Sets

2006-08-29 Thread Simon Stelling
WhiteLemon > WhiteApple > WhiteBlanket > WhiteEnergy > WhiteWhite > go shorten your sig ChrisWhite head -n4 $(<~/.sig) > ~/.sig -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-Status

2006-08-22 Thread Simon Stelling
Lance Albertson wrote: > I generally try to do that, but after the 10th time the person doesn't > respect you and demands things from you, its kind of hard to keep that > mentality. Well, one out of >300. Simply do it for someone else then ;) -- Kind Regards, Simon Stel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-Status

2006-08-22 Thread Simon Stelling
something that should be applied unconditionally, in my opinion. The "you don't so I won't" attitude gets us nowhere. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] User support system [WAS: Sunrise contemplations]

2006-08-16 Thread Simon Stelling
ready are on bugzilla. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-12 Thread Simon Stelling
work if there are multiple packages with the same name in different categories, but if a package maintainer doesn't specify the category in such a case, he should be hit anyway ;P -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments to [STABLE] bugs

2006-08-12 Thread Simon Stelling
Regarding the inline vs. attachment issue, I'd vote for inline too. Just my 0.05 CHF, -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-08 Thread Simon Stelling
as 'update' instead of 'upgrade'. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] client+server packages - build which one?

2006-08-08 Thread Simon Stelling
quot;? Documentation is there to be read! That being said, server/client flags are nice, but not really applicable until we have per-package default USE flags, which is soon I hope. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for advanced useflag-syntax

2006-08-08 Thread Simon Stelling
Enrico Weigelt wrote: foo/bar gui=gtk blah/blubb gui=qt2 bleh/enrico gui=qt4 SCNR -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles

2006-08-08 Thread Simon Stelling
7;. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/2316 -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk1 vs. gtk2

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
ckages. They have the same name. Different versions. That's how it is upstream and how it should be. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk1 vs. gtk2

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
in this thread agreed with you. It won't get anywhere, because you're the only one pushing for that change. I can assure you that every single bug for every package you file will get marked as DUPLICATION of the first bug, which was closed as INVALID. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelli

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk1 vs. gtk2

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
e sense, as - you've pointed it out so many times - the API is incompatible. So, I'm asking you one last time: Do you have any actual good reasons to not package things the way upstream does it? [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143063 -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] SearchSecurity.com: "Linux patch problems: Your distro may vary"

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
don't see how the security team could do much about this; except maybe giving them a yearly budget to travel around the world and slap people who seem to ignore security bugs. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Masking practics

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
hen decide whether the breakage affects you or not and depending on that unmask it locally or remove your bugzilla installation. If there is a bugzilla-ebuild which works with downgraded too, leaving you with a working bugzilla. I can't quite see the massive problem. -- Kind Regards, S

Re: [gentoo-dev] PDA herd call for assistance

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
:' input field. Just add the PDA herd's email address there and you will receive all their bug mails, which has the advantage of not causing a lot of bugzi spam. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk1 vs. gtk2

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
other gtk2. As long as dependencies don't cope the slot cleanly, slotting is utterly useless. =x11-libs/gtk+-1.2* >x11-libs/gtk+-2 do a decent job. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk1 vs. gtk2

2006-08-07 Thread Simon Stelling
You've already been told it's a non-issue, but here's why: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/slotting/index.html -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August

2006-08-04 Thread Simon Stelling
xactly is once they found it out, you wouldn't have ended up with all those "I'm sick and tired of your "we're working on it"". Asking people for patience is easy, but it's hard to swallow when you don't understand what the problem is at all.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for advanced useflag-syntax

2006-08-04 Thread Simon Stelling
responsibility, IMHO. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August

2006-08-03 Thread Simon Stelling
em to say 'bugzilla shall be fix0rd!'? What would that change in reality? I, (and I guess so does solar) fail to see what the council could effectively do in regard to this matter. You should probably elaborate on that. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keep Sunrise... But not Here

2006-07-31 Thread Simon Stelling
Michael Crute wrote: > Thoughts anyone? That's all been done. That's why the last thread's title has the word 'resumed' in it, after all :P -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Resignation

2006-07-31 Thread Simon Stelling
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Good intentions and trying to be helpful don't keep users or > developers. Screwups lose users and developers. It's really funny to hear such a statement from a person who made several great developers leave the project. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stell

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: proxy-dev (an alternative to sunrise?)

2006-07-30 Thread Simon Stelling
l, this is the interesting stuff. Spending hours on one broken build system is far more interesting than writing 100 ebuilds. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category: net-voip

2006-07-22 Thread Simon Stelling
> updated on package moves. Err, yes. At least here you do. -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] making the firefox USE flag a global one

2006-07-19 Thread Simon Stelling
Hanno Böck wrote: > Am Dienstag, 18. Juli 2006 14:06 schrieb Simon Stelling: >> If nobody objects, I'd like to push that change through in two weeks. > > As most of then are "use ff instead of mozilla" and that'll be deprecated in > favour of using ff

  1   2   3   >