On 10/2/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I accept the argument for initscripts, since an embedded system is not
> > likely to have bash. But for compile-time (which shouldn't happen on an
> > embedded target) there simply isn't any real benefit to end-users that I
> > can see.
>
> The
On 7/7/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm ofc not including fetch-restricted which also require interaction,
although that is standardised enough for a script to deal with[1]. Having
found this for games, I can deal with that too ofc, but I still think the
I'm not sure whether specia
On 4/22/07, Chrissy Fullam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
don't you have some liveCD stuff to work on? :-P
I like this new dev already. ;)
--Alex
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 4/13/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 21:16 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> I'm not implying there's anything wrong w/ restricting the bug; just
> that pointing users here to it won't get them very far. ;)
*I* didn't point anyone to that bug, as I knew it was lo
On 4/13/07, Jeffrey Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Tarkovsky wrote:
> Can you tell us the release date then?
>
> I didn't think so. :)
>
> --Alex
Dickish messages like this one might possibly earn you some "cold
shoulder" or "hostility"
On 4/13/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 13 April 2007, Alex Tarkovsky wrote:
> It's mid-April and 2007.0 is still nowhere in sight
you're clearly not part of the release process
Can you tell us the release date then?
I didn't think so. :)
--
On 4/13/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ha, it wont even be leaving package.mask soonish, so i doubt you have any
stable worries
i wonder how hard we want to ride this though ... target 2007.1 ?
It's mid-April and 2007.0 is still nowhere in sight, so the idea that
there will be a
Bryan Østergaard gentoo.org> writes:
>
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:16:47PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> > Alexander Færøy napsal(a):
> > >On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:51:34PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > >>What do you plan on doing next with your time?
> > >
> > >How cute, but please take this i
On 8/2/06, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 15:27, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 04:28, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > 1) Users can submit patches/ideas to bugs.g.o at whatever frequency
> > they desire, contributing to gentoo casually.
>
> And the patch
On 8/2/06, Stephen P. Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Every time you post it's like fingernails on a chalkboard...
>
> http://arcanux.org/scarecrow.png
Ha ha ha! Oh gosh that's funny! That's really funny! Do you photoshop
your own material? Do you? Because that is so fresh. Ciaranm is like a
On 8/2/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The alternative to elitism is mediocrity. Would you like Gentoo to be a
mediocre distribution?
Every time you post it's like fingernails on a chalkboard...
http://arcanux.org/scarecrow.png
Cheers.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 7/30/06, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
| developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1].
Did y
On 7/30/06, Brett I. Holcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My concerns - first for my systems - are that it is allowing essentially
anybody to
submit almost anything with no QA.
This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1]. Every
On 7/30/06, Stephen P. Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is nothing you or anyone else can say that will make me
think otherwise,
You won't listen, yet you expect to be listened to. Speaking as a user
and lover of Gentoo I believe you should resign as a developer.
On this list and on IRC
On 7/24/06, John Jawed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Updated version is up at http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/einput.eclass now.
The version you have up there isn't the latest actually, see the
attachment in the post you just replied to. :)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
To ensure the global vars play nicely in the Portage environment I've
renamed a few, and moved a couple more to functions as locals and
literal strings. Also improved on the inline documentation and renamed
a couple of functions to something more intuitive.
einput.eclass
Description: Binary data
Updated version. I had forgotten to remove the case-insensitive stuff
from einput_list(). Input is now case-sensitive, as ebuild devs may
want, for example, "r" and "R" to represent two different (but
related) choices.
Also did a little tidying.
einput.eclass
Description: Binary data
On 7/23/06, John Jawed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice work on this, it's looking good now. Is there a reason the
leading asterisk was dropped? Having it there might be good for
readability as well as keeping in line with the "look here" (einfo,
eerror, ewarn, etc) motif in portage.
I was indee
Attached is an overhaul of John's code. Aside from some bugfixes and
readability improvements, the most significant changes are:
- Renamed functions to follow de facto and emerging Portage API naming
conventions.
- Validation of input for the list prompt and confirmation prompt functions.
- Add
19 matches
Mail list logo
