On 06/08/2016 11:21 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:07:06 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> There are some of us against GitHub and/or other commercial outfits, so
>> that's not a problem. We offer some mirrors on GitHub, and some devs
>> host things on there, but it's
Hi!
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:07:06 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote:
> There are some of us against GitHub and/or other commercial outfits, so
> that's not a problem. We offer some mirrors on GitHub, and some devs
> host things on there, but it's nothing officially endorsed or otherwise
> required by Gen
On 09/06/16 15:31, NP-Hardass wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 01:03 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> [...]
>> Proxy-maint team: do you guys feel that your project and/or process are
>> a suitable starting point to becoming a proper Gentoo developer?
> As with everything, it depends on the individual. One can c
On 06/09/2016 01:03 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
[...]
> Proxy-maint team: do you guys feel that your project and/or process are
> a suitable starting point to becoming a proper Gentoo developer?
As with everything, it depends on the individual. One can certainly cut
their teeth and learn/contribute
On 06/08/2016 10:54 AM, james wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 11:27 AM, Nathan Zachary wrote:
>>
>>> GitHub Inc. is successful because they host a central location with
>>> "all the code on the Internet"; convenient for consumers and
>>> producers alike. Of course it is a fallacy, but it's convenient
>>> wh
On 06/08/2016 08:53 AM, james wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 08:16 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> Friends,
>
> It would be wise of us to create a novel way of involving users from
> the ashes of Sunrise.
>
> Here is my suggestion: It would be fruitful to encourage every single
> Gentoo user to have thei
On 06/08/2016 02:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 18:50:05 -0400
> NP-Hardass wrote:
>
>> From what I've seen, HACKING is a fairly common doc in FOSS projects.
>> It doesn't seem to have been included in the default DOCS for
>> einstalldocs in EAPI6. While going through the MATE p
On 09/06/16 09:08, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>> This could lead to a future where the Gentoo tree is largely
>> superseded. Every user would just have their own repository, where
>> they could pick and choose packages from other users. The Gentoo tree
>> would just focus on a high-quality reposi
On 09/06/16 00:08, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> > This could lead to a future where the Gentoo tree is largely
> > superseded. Every user would just have their own repository, where
> > they could pick and choose packages from other users. The Gentoo tree
> > would just focus on a high-quality rep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
>
> This could lead to a future where the Gentoo tree is largely
> superseded. Every user would just have their own repository, where
> they could pick and choose packages from other users. The Gentoo tree
> would just focus on a high-quality reposi
On 06/07/2016 04:59 PM, Austin English wrote:
>
> On 06/07/2016 06:19 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>> On 07/06/16 23:50, NP-Hardass wrote:
>>> From what I've seen, HACKING is a fairly common doc in FOSS projects.
>>> It doesn't seem to have been included in the default DOCS for
>>> einstalldocs in EAP
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 08:27:06 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed review. I followed every suggestion except the
> doexe thing for *.so files (only because I don't understand the
> reasoning yet). The new version is attached.
Next time, please inline and don't attach. It's awfu
Hi,
I only have a local overlay for now.
The shadow team still did'nt had time to merge my pull request on github.
But you can use my github branch:
https://github.com/fariouche/shadow.git
In the bugzilla you will find all the needed patches, except the shadow ebuild
modified to use my branch.
F
On 06/08/2016 11:27 AM, Nathan Zachary wrote:
GitHub Inc. is successful because they host a central location with
"all the code on the Internet"; convenient for consumers and
producers alike. Of course it is a fallacy, but it's convenient
when it works.
Ensure that Gentoo accomplishes the same
On 08/06/16 08:30 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Dale wrote:
>
>> Just a thought here. Is there a way to do a news announcement for
>> people that have a package installed from the overlay? If that
>> could be done, then users who don't use it won't be bothered by it
>> bu
> GitHub Inc. is successful because they host a central location with
> "all the code on the Internet"; convenient for consumers and
> producers alike. Of course it is a fallacy, but it's convenient
> when it works.
>
> Ensure that Gentoo accomplishes the same for Gentoo.
>
> Do NOT - I repeat NOT
Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> It would be fruitful to encourage every single Gentoo user to have
> their own repository. And this repository should be publicly available.
..
> What are your thoughts?
Genius.
This is exactly what I have been doing for many years, but I couldn't
have expressed it as
On 15:16 Wed 08 Jun, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> Friends,
>
> It would be wise of us to create a novel way of involving users from
> the ashes of Sunrise.
>
> Here is my suggestion: It would be fruitful to encourage every single
> Gentoo user to have their own repository. And this repository shou
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>
> This could lead to a future where the Gentoo tree is largely
> superseded. Every user would just have their own repository, where
> they could pick and choose packages from other users. The Gentoo tree
> would just focus on a high-quali
On 06/08/2016 08:16 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Friends,
It would be wise of us to create a novel way of involving users from
the ashes of Sunrise.
Here is my suggestion: It would be fruitful to encourage every single
Gentoo user to have their
On 06/08/2016 06:16 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> In the end, Gentoo might make a gigantic leap into the future with a
> truly modular distribution. If anyone wants to look at distros that
> get this more right than Gentoo, have a look at e.g. NixOS and Exherbo.
>
> What are your thoughts?
The
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:04:02 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb:
> > Therefore, I'd like to ask the following question: is it time to
> > announce the project dead, or do some developers want to revive it?
> > If the former, could someone try to contact last active co
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:30:51 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Dale wrote:
>
> > Just a thought here. Is there a way to do a news announcement for
> > people that have a package installed from the overlay? If that
> > could be done, then users who don't use it won't be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Friends,
It would be wise of us to create a novel way of involving users from
the ashes of Sunrise.
Here is my suggestion: It would be fruitful to encourage every single
Gentoo user to have their own repository. And this repository should
be public
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:33:45 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I though the goal was to rid profiles/ of files other than profiles.
>
> Thinking about it, putting it into profiles would make a lot of sense.
> For example, one would want to def
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Dale wrote:
> Just a thought here. Is there a way to do a news announcement for
> people that have a package installed from the overlay? If that
> could be done, then users who don't use it won't be bothered by it
> but users who do will get the news announcement about
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>
> I agree that the Sunrise repository should be removed from
> repositories.xml. I don't know if there is any way of informing users
> beforehand of this change happening. If not, then a grace period is
> probably pointless.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Chí-Thanh Ch
Michał Górny schrieb:
Therefore, I'd like to ask the following question: is it time to
announce the project dead, or do some developers want to revive it?
If the former, could someone try to contact last active contributors
and ask them if they'd like to move their ebuilds to ::gentoo
via proxy-m
On 06/07/2016 10:31 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> > Your thoughts?
>
> > [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Sunrise
>
> Sunrise was a great way to learn packaging for Gentoo. Reviews were
> *very*
> strict in the past, resulting in better QA standards than the Gentoo
> main tree
But here'
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> I though the goal was to rid profiles/ of files other than profiles.
Thinking about it, putting it into profiles would make a lot of sense.
For example, one would want to define any systemd paths only in
non-systemd profiles.
> I can change the GL
Dnia 8 czerwca 2016 09:05:37 CEST, Andrew Savchenko
napisał(a):
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 22:31:46 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Sunrise was a great way to learn packaging for Gentoo. Reviews were
>*very*
>> strict in the past, resulting in better QA standards than the Gentoo
>main tree
>
Dnia 8 czerwca 2016 09:17:06 CEST, Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 07:26:21 +0200
>> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>>> Therefore I think that repository metadata is the wrong place for
>>> storing the install-mask.conf file. It is config
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 07:26:21 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Therefore I think that repository metadata is the wrong place for
>> storing the install-mask.conf file. It is configuration, specific to
>> Portage (but not to the repository), so /usr/s
Hi,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 22:31:46 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Sunrise was a great way to learn packaging for Gentoo. Reviews were *very*
> strict in the past, resulting in better QA standards than the Gentoo main
> tree
> - - and a definite frustration threshold that one had to overcome. Wi
34 matches
Mail list logo
