On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:04:02 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chith...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb: > > Therefore, I'd like to ask the following question: is it time to > > announce the project dead, or do some developers want to revive it? > > If the former, could someone try to contact last active contributors > > and ask them if they'd like to move their ebuilds to ::gentoo > > via proxy-maint? > > I agree that the Sunrise repository should be removed from > repositories.xml. I don't know if there is any way of informing users > beforehand of this change happening. If not, then a grace period is > probably pointless. > > Moving ebuilds to proxy-maint and ::gentoo is complicated by the fact > that there is no concept of maintainer in sunrise. (This is also why we > were stricter than the portage tree, because the original committer > might not be around when the next person would have to make changes.) > As every package in sunrise has an associated maintainer-wanted bug, it > would be good to post a message to each such bug to encourage interested > users to contact proxy-maint. Thanks for this idea! I'm going to collect the bug nos now, and leave an appropriate comment everywhere. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpDmcoH_erjL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
