On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 16:34 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> I would expect it to act like any other Linux box and get a new address
> via dhcp, or, if I wasn't using dhcp, sit on the old address, even
> though it is now incorrect, until I changed it. A netplug event should
> trigger dhcp events,
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 16:31 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:10 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > At this point, the process freezes for a LONG time that can't be
> > interupted because as the cable has already been unplugged it can't
> > unmount (if anyone knows how to actuall
Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2007 schrieb ext Benjamin Smee:
> it works with baselayout-1.
I rechecked again yesterday evening, to make sure I didn't overlook
something. No, it doesn't, at least for me.
> So please file a bug.
Done. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189073
Bye...
Dir
On 8/15/07, Vaeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
> > On 8/13/07, Nathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I suppose this comes down to weighing the utility of such a feature
> > > against the amount of effort which would go into adding it to Portage.
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 17:34 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 17:07 +0100, Graham Murray wrote:
> > To avoid that problem, do not stop net.ethN when the cable is
> > pulled. When the cable is re-inserted then (if it has not been left
> > disconnected for too long) if the services ha
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:10 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> At this point, the process freezes for a LONG time that can't be
> interupted because as the cable has already been unplugged it can't
> unmount (if anyone knows how to actually return ASAP I'd like to know
> that too).
umount -l
The problem
On Wednesday 15 Aug 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> If say you have nfs mounts, one network cable and then unplug the cable
> you get this :-
>netplug calls net.eth0 stop
>net.eth0 stop calls netmount stop
>netmount stop tries to unmount the nfs mounts
Perhaps it should be seen the other wa
Dnia 15-08-2007, śro o godzinie 13:09 -0400, Luis Francisco Araujo
napisał(a):
>
> Count me in! o/
And don't forget we play in one team ;-)
--
,-.
| Dawid Węgliński |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| cla @ irc.freenode.net |
| GPG: 295E72D9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe some of you have already seen app-portage/maintainer-helper from
> Jokey. It is written for Qt, but I was just happy to replace the last
> Qt app with something agnostic/GTK+ based on my system. Unluckily
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 17:07 +0100, Graham Murray wrote:
> To avoid that problem, do not stop net.ethN when the cable is
> pulled. When the cable is re-inserted then (if it has not been left
> disconnected for too long) if the services have not stopped, TCP
> sessions may still be active.
So what d
Graham Murray wrote:
Mike Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Could you please describe the problem you faced? From the detail you
gave, it sounds as though you might not have moved /etc/conf.d/cryptfs
to /etc/conf.d/dmcrypt.
I had a problem. I moved /etc/conf.d/cryptfs to /etc/
Mike Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you please describe the problem you faced? From the detail you
> gave, it sounds as though you might not have moved /etc/conf.d/cryptfs
> to /etc/conf.d/dmcrypt.
I had a problem. I moved /etc/conf.d/cryptfs to /etc/conf.d/dmcrypt, but
none of t
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If say you have nfs mounts, one network cable and then unplug the cable
> you get this :-
>netplug calls net.eth0 stop
>net.eth0 stop calls netmount stop
>netmount stop tries to unmount the nfs mounts
> At this point, the process freezes for a
On Wed, 2007-15-08 at 15:02 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 10:09 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> > I believe services that don't bind to a specific address should probably
> > only depend on net.lo, not net.
>
> Well, they can actually depend on a specific net service too.
> For e
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 10:09 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> I believe services that don't bind to a specific address should probably
> only depend on net.lo, not net.
Well, they can actually depend on a specific net service too.
For example, I have this on my home server in /etc/conf.d/lighttpd
RC_N
On Wed, 2007-15-08 at 14:10 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> OK, so whilst we're gearing up for hopefully the last baselayout-2
> release candidate I thought I would pose to the list a question I've
> been struggling with for some time.
>
> Should hotplugged services affect dependencies by default?
> (
I suppose I should mention that the setting in baselayout-2 I'm talking
about is RC_DEPEND_STRICT if you want to toggle it to see.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
OK, so whilst we're gearing up for hopefully the last baselayout-2
release candidate I thought I would pose to the list a question I've
been struggling with for some time.
Should hotplugged services affect dependencies by default?
(Note, this is not about enabling hotplugged services by default wh
heya,
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 12:26:32 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Yes, did it. And added dmcrypt to the boot runlevel.
don't unless you're running baselayout-2
> But it doesn't. While booting, the dmcrypt init script says it works on bl
> 2 only, mappings are not created. Why is this change nee
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 11:56:55 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 11:15 Wed 15 Aug , Mike Auty wrote:
> > Could you please describe the problem you faced? From the detail you
> > gave, it sounds as though you might not have moved /etc/conf.d/cryptfs
> > to /etc/conf.d/dmcrypt. There's curr
heya,
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 07:01:12 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 14. August 2007 schrieb ext Benjamin Smee:
> I'm not a developer, but since I was already bitten by this, a few comments:
> > >=cryptsetup-1.0.5 as -luks will be deprecated soon.
>
> Don't do this until upgrading/repla
On 11:15 Wed 15 Aug , Mike Auty wrote:
> Could you please describe the problem you faced? From the detail you
> gave, it sounds as though you might not have moved /etc/conf.d/cryptfs
> to /etc/conf.d/dmcrypt. There's currently several ewarn lines saying
> that this must be done before t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dirk,
Could you please describe the problem you faced? From the detail you
gave, it sounds as though you might not have moved /etc/conf.d/cryptfs
to /etc/conf.d/dmcrypt. There's currently several ewarn lines saying
that this must be done befo
Hi,
Maybe some of you have already seen app-portage/maintainer-helper from
Jokey. It is written for Qt, but I was just happy to replace the last
Qt app with something agnostic/GTK+ based on my system. Unluckily I
have no real idea about GTK+ and it would be nice, if someone could
help Jokey to p
# Gunnar Wrobel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15 Aug 2007)
# Has open security bugs and upstream seems to be dead
# http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158698
www-apps/ids
will be removed in 30 days as usual if nobody objects.
--
Gunnar WrobelGentoo Developer
__C_o
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
Sorry guys, was for -user-de
V-Li
--
http://www.gentoo.org/
http://www.faulhammer.org/
http://www.gnupg.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Volker Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Sind sie nicht vorhanden, dann die Pakete xset und xsetroot
> > nachinstallieren (und ggf. einen Bugreport erstellen über fehlende
> > Abhängigkeiten).
xset und xsetroot werden in den Skripten aufgerufen, haben aber am
Ende keinen Effekt.
> Allerdings ist mi
Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2007 schrieb ext Duncan:
> So baselayout-2 hard-masking isn't likely to be an issue for much longer.
Well, for me it was an issue yesterday.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111
C
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So baselayout-2 hard-masking isn't likely to be an issue for much
> longer.
As long as it bl-2 is hard masked, all packages depending on it,
should be too.
V-Li
--
http://www.gentoo.org/
http://www.faulhammer.org/
http://www.gnupg.org/
signature.asc
Description:
Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed,
15 Aug 2007 08:01:12 +0200:
> Please hard mask cryptsetup as long as baselayout 2 is, or fix it to
> work with bl 1, too.
See the "baselayout-2 stabilization plans" thread from July 21, and
http://bugs.gentoo.o
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
> On 8/13/07, Nathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I suppose this comes down to weighing the utility of such a feature
> > against the amount of effort which would go into adding it to Portage.
>
> Its trivial to implement, but I think its a long s
31 matches
Mail list logo
