Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

Garrett Rooney wrote: I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation. +1. I would love to see Lucene4c take off, and making it part of Lucene would be a great boost to it. -Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [VOTE] @domain for Incubator mailing lists

Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: We don't support any of those. Who's "we"? As a user, I still prefer marc over mail-archives a real lot and am happy about any Apache project that's available on Marc. mod_mbox[1] accepts patches. Feel free to help for any part of mod_mbox or

Re: [PROPOSAL] Solr

I would be interested in helping out with Solr. Next Steps? Yonik Seeley wrote: Hello Incubator PMC folks, I would like to propose a new Apache project named Solr. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SolrProposal The project is being proposed as a sub-project of Lucene, and the Lucene PMC has agr

Re: OFBiz Marketing and Services

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hola, Sure, but J Aaron already beat me to it ;) One other decent page not included in his post is http://www.apache.org/info/support.cgi of HTTP support providers. The text at the top is good. This one is a really bad example. It hasn't been updated in *years*. -Paul -

Re: [libcloud] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.2

Poke to general@ people, we need more IPMC votes for this release to happen :( On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Jerry Chen wrote: > Hi all, > > With 6x +1 votes (including 2 binding), and no -1 votes, the vote seeks the > approval of the IPMC. > > Thanks, > Jerry > > On Jan 8, 2011, at 12:10 AM

Re: [Proposal]: Libcloud to become a TLP

e Libcloud Project: > >  * Eric Woods (wood...@apache.org) >  * Jed Smith (j...@apache.org) >  * Jeremiah Orem(or...@apache.org) >  * Jerry Chen (je...@apache.org) >  * Roman Bogorodskiy (rbogorods...@apache.org) >  * Tom Davis (t...@apache.org) >  * Tomaz Muraus (to...@apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-rc2

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache > Cassandra 0.4.0-rc2. We would now like to request the approval of the > Incubator PMC for this release. > > Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distri

[PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project

as part of the incubator process. Core Developers Alex Polvi who wrote most of the original code is familiar with open source from working at OSUOSL and at Mozilla. Tom Davis drove much of the re factoring of the initial code base. Jed Smith, Ivan Meredith, Jeremy Orem, Jerry Chen and Paul Querna

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Sebastian Wagner wrote: > hi, > > we would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator. > > Full Proposal: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal > > Quick summary: > OpenMeetings is Web Conferencing application that fits into educat

Re: [PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On 27 Oct 2009, at 06:59, Paul Querna wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud project to >> join the ASF: > > +1.  Looks interesting! > > There seem to be

[VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

of the re factoring of the initial code base. Jed Smith, Ivan Meredith, Jeremy Orem, Jerry Chen and Paul Querna (ASF member) have all contributed mainly to developing provider specific drivers. Alignment Currently there are not many Apache communities involved with cloud computing or pytho

Re: [PROPOSAL] Libcloud Project

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> Reliance on Salaried Developers >> >> The majority, but not all, of the developers are paid by their >> employer to work on libcloud at this time.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors.  I > would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF. > > The proposal is included below and is also at: > <http://wiki.apache.org/incubato

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >  Subversion is a version control system.  You probably know it well as > it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software > Foundation. +1, good luck on the incubation :-) ---

Re: Review-Then-Commit

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Not a "strong opinion", but I think that RTC hampers the free-flow of > ideas, experimentation, evolution, and creativity. It is a damper on > expressivity. You maneuver bureaucracy to get a change in. CTR is > about making a change and discussi

Re: Where to add PPMC member additions?

ping? anyone know the answer? I can't find the file referenced, nor can I find any other file where PPMCs are supposed to keep their list updated? On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Hi, > > reading http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, it says (towards the > end) to

Re: document translation infrastructure?

(adding d...@httpd cc) On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Miles Libbey wrote: > Hi folks- > We have a volunteer to translate our documentation from English into Korean. >  Any recommendations for translation management/infrastructure? That is-- as > the english documentation changes, is there any

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Bhuvaneswaran A wrote: >> >> We tend to update the api docs generated using doxygen and java doc on >> a nightly basis. > > Unreleased artifacts should be linked only from the developer portion of the > site and should not be hosted on the off

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: >> >> httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically, >> they aren't based on any release. > > Were these published these on the official public website or in the dev

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >> I suspect that renaming /docs/trunk/ to /docs/dev/ would be sufficient and >> follow this best practice? > > I don't know how much folks look at the URL, but I think I've heard Roy > indicate that all developer-

Re: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/4/2010 11:24 PM, Martin Cooper wrote: >> In that case, +0 from me. We gain the elimination of the p.a.o bit but >> lose the benefit of the delay, so it's basically a wash, as far as I'm >> concerned. > > After several years of watc

Re: Source code dumps via JIRA?

For most projects they just put a URL in the jira, and Joe just imports it. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 8, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: For OODT, we think we want to import the prior history of the project into the podling via a Subversion dump file. However, in: http://in

Re: Checking status of "transfer rights" ?

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Hi, > > sorry if this is not the right channel for this question, but, I'd like to > find out if ASF has received any paperworks from Yahoo!, showing that we've > transfered the rights for Traffic Server code to ASF. If not, is there a > form

[VOTE] Release Apache libcloud 0.2.0

The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our first release, 0.2.0. As required by Incubator policy, we need IPMC approval for this release. There is a concurrent release vote ongoing on . The current (passing) RAT output can be seen at:

Re: [VOTE] Subversion podling for graduation

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hello all, > > I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for > Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been > handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential > showstoppers, an

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:09 PM, ant elder wrote: > I had a look. Unfortunately the main release artifact > apache-trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha.tar.bz2 is missing the top > level LICENSE and NOTICE files. Those are mentioned in the README and > do look like they're in SVN so maybe there is

Cross Cloud TLP, was Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:41 PM, David Lutterkort wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the Deltacloud API[1] for addition to the Apache > incubator. Awesome! > I have added the initial proposal to the Wiki[2]; it is also included > below for convenience. > > There are a few additional people

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Question: what¹s the relationship of this proposal to Whirr, which we¹re > currently voting [1] on? Whirr would be built on top of Deltacloud or Libcloud -- Whirr is more about 'end user' scripts and tools to manage p

[VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our second release, 0.3.0. As required by Incubator policy, we need IPMC approval for this release. There is a concurrent release vote ongoing on . The current (passing) RAT output can be seen at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: > On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >> The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our second release, >>  0.3.0.  As required by Incubator policy, we need IPMC approval for >>  this release.  There is a concurrent re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >>> The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our second release, >>>  0.3.0.  As required by Incubator policy, we need

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.0

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote: > On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna wrote: >>  > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: >>  >> On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >>  >>> The Apach

[VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: Please test and place your votes please; +/- 1 [ ] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 Vote closes on Monday May 10, 2010 at 1pm PST. This release fixes several issues related to the lic

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >> Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: >>   <http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/libcloud-0.3.1/> > > Where is the KEYS file? http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lib

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, sebb wrote: > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >>  >> Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: >>  >>   <htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM, sebb wrote: > On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >>  >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: >>  >>  > On 07/05/2010, Pau

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 08/05/2010, sebb wrote: >> On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >>  > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM, sebb wrote: >>  >  > On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna wrote: >>  >  >> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

FTR, +1 from me. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: >  <http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/libcloud-0.3.1/> > > Please test and place your votes please; > >  +/- 1 >  [  ]  Release Apache Libclo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.3.1

about a day once the mirrors sync. Thanks Everyone, Paul On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at: >  <http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/libcloud-0.3.1/> > > Please test and place your votes please; >

Re: Cross Cloud TLP, was Re: [PROPOSAL] Deltacloud Project

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > For me, not so much. > > A TLP owns a code base and is responsible for it. While I appreciate the > sentiment, I don't think it's wise to require that different communities > with nothing else in common except "cloud" in their name have to

Re: Incubator proposal template

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > - Original Message > >> From: Upayavira >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Sat, May 29, 2010 4:58:21 PM >> Subject: Re: Incubator proposal template >> >> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 08:08 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> I reall

[VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.0

Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.4.0 are available at: Please test and place your votes please; +/- 1 [ ] Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.0 Vote closes on Monday October 11, 2010 at 10am PST. This is our first release of the 0.4 and t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.0

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.4.0 are available at: >  <http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/libcloud-0.4.0/> > > Please test and place your votes please; > >  +/- 1 >  [  ]  Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.

Re: Release guidelines for python and php libraries?

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > Does anyone happen to know of some pre-existing release guidelines for > python or php libraries, either in an apache TLP or a podling? For Chemistry > we've got the docs sorted for maven-based releases of the java codeline, and > now

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.4.0

With 9x +1s, (at least 3 binding), and no -1s, vote passes, I'll push the tarballs to the mirrors and plan on the announcement email tomorrow. Thanks everyone, Paul On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.4.0 are available at:

Re: Voting time period can be shortened ? (was: [VOTE] Release Kafka 0.7.0-incubating)

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > Hi, > > The context for this is the discussion here - > http://markmail.org/message/rsxjgrrufc6khlqy?q=overhead+list:org.apache.incubator.general > > This was a long discussion with no clear answers. > > We would like to know if it is OK to e

Re: Releases By Retired Podlings

Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Jan 14, 2008 3:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i've been searching for releases by retired podlings in order to archive them but can't locate releases for any of them anyone have any ideas about what happend to them? Examples? Agila AltRMI Axi

Re: [VOTE] as to Thrift Proposal

On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the Wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal +1 -Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

Santiago Gala wrote: El dom, 17-02-2008 a las 19:02 -0500, Noel J. Bergman escribió: No. This is the wrong forum. What we've said here is that there won't be any deviation from the ASF infrastructure for source control; changing ASF infrastructure is out of scope for the Incubator. I alrea

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

Daniel Kulp wrote: On Monday 18 February 2008, Paul Querna wrote: in a private list does not accord with *our way of working*, I think. And I don't think there is any need to use a private, unarchived list for discussions on infrastructure improvements. infrastructure is open to all commi

Thrift Status?

Back in Febuary, the vote to accept Thrift into the Apache Incubator was successful: But since then, I haven't seen any movement... on anything. Does anyone know what is going on? Thanks, -Paul -

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we really need an incubator?

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote: There is no reason for a separate repository. [A separate repo] does not help protect "users" from incubator code, since users don't set the Maven configs that define which repos to use and which modules are dependencies. At best, what it does is

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we really need an incubator?

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote: There is no reason for a separate repository. [A separate repo] does not help protect "users" from incubator code, since users don't set the Maven configs that define which repos to use and which modules are dependencies. At best, what it does is

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we really need an incubator?

Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: [...] Until the Maven PMC stops abrogating its responsibility and addresses the issues, there does not appear to be anything that we can do about Maven's fla

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

-1, (Binding). (For the reasons explained by Craig and Justin in this Thread) Thanks, Paul Craig L Russell wrote: -1 I believe that allowing incubating releases to be treated as full Apache releases diminishes the Apache brand and makes incubation disclaimers moot. With Maven, it is too e

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: So you assume that that www.apache.org can not be hacked? What if a signing key *IS* in KEYS but not signed by anyone (because the developer has never attended an Apache key signing event)? No, I answered your question. W.r.t. www.apac

Re: On incubating releases

Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Do we want users to have easy access to these releases, or to make it difficult? Users need to know about the fact that Apache does not yet vouch for the community behind these releases. How do

Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

Garrett Rooney wrote: After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the long incubation process (started in May 2006!), but I think the Abdera c

Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

Garrett Rooney wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: The discussion included determining the list of people to put on the final PMC list. The actual list of Abdera committers was larger, but many of them had not participa

Re: [Proposal] Helenus - a Cassandra fork

Roland Weber wrote: Hello Ian, I'd like to propose a fork of the cassandra project. Since it was initially released by FaceBook, It hasn't really grown an active community around it. [...] Several people who plan to use the project in their companies have banded together and want to fork the pr

Re: PIWI / PHP Projects in Apache

Christian Grobmeier wrote: Hi all, we have developed a web framework in PHP, called PIWI: - http://piwi.googlecode.com/ - http://piwiframework.de/ Codebase supports very much features right now and only lacks user documentation and has some open discussions left. Find a feature list below. It

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

and perhaps > eventually working on C implementations of some of its functionality. I am also interested in helping mentor the project, and to work on a C implementation of its functionality. Possibly even donate code for a C based parser. Paul Querna

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

Paul Fremantle wrote: On 5/22/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Possibly even donate code for a C based parser. Sounds good. There is also a C version of the Apache Axiom xml model that the proposed ARI codebase has been written with which should make it easier. The Axiom

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

1 Geir Magnusson Jr ... this vote passes. At this point I'd like to ask that the mentors (Garrett Rooney, and Paul Querna) create the status file and work with infrastructure to get the necessary mailing lists, repository, and the like set up. I'd be happy to do so, but I probably won't

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

Garrett Rooney wrote: On 6/5/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 6/5/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> With the following votes cast: >> >> +1 Sam Ruby >> +1 Garrett Roo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Heraldry Identity Project

General Comments: Is it possible to put this proposal onto the wiki ( http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ ) for a stable url when there are updates/changes? Recordon, David wrote: snip Initial Committers -- David Recordon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Andy Dale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: atom feeds for projects

robert burrell donkin wrote: > On 7/2/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> robert burrell donkin wrote: >> > the mailing list archives at apache run on mod_mbox which also supplies >> > atom >> > feeds for these lists. i've added the feed from general to the front >> page >> > and think it

Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator

Ted Leung wrote: > It seems like the discussion on Heraldry has died down, so I'd like to > call for a VOTE on accepting Heraldry into the incubator. > > In keeping with Apache practice, I'd like to allow 72 hours or so for > the vote to close, so please vote by 11:59PST on Thursday July 13th. >

Re: [discussion] Harmony podling to ask for vote for graduation

Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 18 October 2006 10:33, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: Will you be satisfied with a vote on posting a snapshot? I think some Incubator PMC member wants to see a 'full release' artifact for review. I don't. The podling should select a release manager producing th

Re: Including snapshot dependencies from other ASF projects

John O'Hara wrote: > I don't think its the same as releasing another projects code. > A good example is when SubVersion included APR as part of its code > base. No > one would have confused that as a release of APR, and it was patched and > modded, and the APR team were kept in the loop. For the