For most projects they just put a URL in the jira, and Joe just
imports it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 8, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com>
wrote:
For OODT, we think we want to import the prior history of the project
into the podling via a Subversion dump file. However, in:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-
dump
it says:
---
In either case, the code to be imported should be attached to a JIRA
and then imported. It is recommended that the previous version control
system is tagged so that the imported version is precisely known.
A public record MUST be made of the code imported. If the import is
not attached to JIRA then it MUST be committed to version control.
---
I can understand the rationale for having a public record, but I'm not
seeing the reasoning for JIRA.
Can someone please shed some light on this? Is this really reflective
of actual best practices?
As a counter-example, I'd believe providing a URL to the dump (or
uploading it to people.a.o) and providing a SHA checksum via email
(PGP-signed?) would be sufficient for our purposes. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
