On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: >> >> httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically, >> they aren't based on any release. > > Were these published these on the official public website or in the dev/ > section? > > I was under the impression that released documentation should be treated > similarly to released code. The convention I've used is that stuff that's > in trunk, stuff that's intended to be included in releases, is only > published after release. Other pages on the website that are not included > in releases, e.g., the project's home page, are clearly published without a > release vote.
<http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/> Which is linked from the sidebar everywhere, and on the docs page: <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/> > In particular, I think it's a bad practice to publish automatic nightly > builds on the official website of content that's otherwise the subject of > release votes. Is it forbidden? Perhaps not, but it's not a practice we > should encourage in the incubator. Often documentation includes code. Do > we want to publish that code without a vote? httpd docs don't include code, dunno what projects do :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
