ection:
> - src/main/javadoc/stylesheet.css file has missing Apache
> license header. (This file has been removed in master)
>
>- Dave Fisher (+1 binding)
>- I checked the same as Furkan.
>
>I am concerned that you were downloading from repository
Carrying over my +1 (Binding)
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 2:22 PM, SHUANG SU wrote:
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache ECharts
> (incubating) 4.4.0 (release candidate 1).
>
> Apache ECharts community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
>
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 1:54 AM, Ming wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussion of APISIX proposal
> (discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aada574d5fe8e9cf246f213f3915aebb2afa710607676c2af5d5eb73@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.o
+1 (binding)
Incubating in name
Checksums and signatures checked
RAT Check passes once link is bypassed
LICENSE.txt checks
NOTICE checks
DISCLAIMER checks
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 8:08 AM, Ville Brofeldt wrote:
>
> Dear IPMC,
>
> The Apache Superset community has voted on and approv
Hi Justin,
I don’t think this step is documented for new, graduated and retired podlings.
For example you still have zipkin in the list.
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 4:18 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Yes, I saw that which is why I edited directly in the board whimsy. Sorry
>
Hi -
No one has added the proposal to the Board agenda. Please do so ASAP. The Board
meeting is next Wednesday and the Board wants some time to review the agenda.
If you require help then please ask.
Regards,
Dave (with my new Director hat)
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 9:46 AM, Moaz Reyad wrote:
>
Hi -
Sorry, I found the email to the Board@a.o mailing list. I added the resolution
to the Board Agenda.
Best Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> No one has added the proposal to the Board agenda. Please do so ASAP. The
> Boa
n-binding)
>- Successfully ran example scripts on a Pig cluster: theta, tuple
> (array of doubles), quantiles, kll, frequent strings
>
>- Dave Fisher (+1 binding)
>- Incubating in name
>- Checksums and Signatures are good.
>- RatCheck passes
&
+1 as the Incubator story is better explained here[2].
The master is here [3]
Regards,
Dave
[2] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html
[3] http://www.apache.org/dev/
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2019, at 1:59 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The page here [1] doesn’t
Hi -
An interesting proposal. I am concerned about the very small size of the
Initial Committer list with 3 individuals one of whom I only see small
contributions from on https://github.com/rstudio/sparklyr/graphs/contributors
Do the Mentors intend to be active participants in the community?
A
+1 (binding)
Incubating in name
Signature and Checksums Validated
DISCLAIMER-WIP is present
LICENSE is good
NOTICE is good
RatCheck confirms proper License Headers
`mvn clean install` inferred as build from pom.xml
This ought to be in the README.md since it runs for a very long time
and t
+1 (binding)
Incubating in name
Signature and Checksum are correct
LICENSE is good
NOTICE is good
DISCLAIMER is good
Rat check passes. Consider adding exclusions for the two sets of files that are
in the LICENSE file and shown as on-standard in the Rat check output.
Build did fail when it got to
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 2:16 PM, Balaji Varadarajan wrote:
>
> Thanks Dave. I have addressed your comments related to Confluent packages and
> release notes in master with this PR :
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hudi/pull/965
>
> Balaji.V
>
> On 2019/
Apache Pulsar is doing well and it is competing with Apache Kafka.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Kafka is one of the most well known Apache projects right now; I don’t
> think that’s a fair comparison.
>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:0
Hi -
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 7:26 PM, 俊平堵 wrote:
>
> bq. You might be right about that the project currently I believe there's
> only one mentor with recent mentoring experience, and while all proposed are
> ASF members, not all of them are active on the IPMC general list. It might
> be better for
Repeating my +1 here
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 3:36 PM, Alexander Saydakov
> wrote:
>
> Dear Apache DataSketches IPMC and Community,
>
> This is a call for vote to release Apache DataSketches-postgresql
> version 1.3.0-incubating-rc2
>
> This is an extension fo
.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> From the PPMC Vote we cary over 1 binding IPMC Votes:
>
> +1 from Dave Fisher
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] +0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package beca
+1. That’s a good idea.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra,
>
> As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very
> low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be
> candi
Hi YorkShen,
Weex needs to complete a Podling Name Search -
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html
An issue is created here -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH
Someone on the Podling needs to do the research. The VP, Brand will approve or
ask questions. The Boa
+1 (binding)
Go TubeMQ.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 29, 2019, at 6:48 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread on TubeMQ has died down.
>
> Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept TubeMQ into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> Please cast your vote
Hi -
I’ll point out that your champion and mentors do have access and they could
easily do that for you.
Regards,
Dave
> On Nov 1, 2019, at 12:48 AM, Dominik Riemer wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Kenn, that's awesome!
> I'll add you as a mentor once we got access to the wiki, afterwards I'll
Hi YorkShen,
> On Nov 1, 2019, at 10:33 AM, 申远 wrote:
>
> Hi, Justin.
>
> After serious thinking these days, I decided to withindraw the graduation
> vote. We need spend more time in Incubator, this graduation vote is a
> little hurry.
>
> I admitted your concerns about diverse and independent
ow for the Beam wiki, so I know what it looks like)
>
> Kenn
>
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:04 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> I’ll point out that your champion and mentors do have access and they
>> could easily do that for you.
>>
&
For the changes to podlings.xml one example of a graduation to a subproject is
DistributedLog.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> Omid[1] and Tephra[2] have voted to join the Phoenix community as
> sub-projects. Phoenix has voted to accept
ly basis for improved visibility and searchability.
> We have an open INFRA ticket on this issue.
> We are searching for a solution to provide more open access to
> our video conference sessions when we have them. We are in the
> process of moving more of our inter
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 8, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> KAM
>
>> On 11/8/2019 12:59 AM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> Asif
>>
>>> On 2019/11/07 21:52:24, Joe Witt wrote:
>>> +1(bindi
Hi Alan,
The podlings.xml change is not really correct. It’s not documented but instead
of you need to have a something like this for each:
https://phoenix.apache.org/omid/“/>
This creates the a link on the table on https://incubator.apache.org/projects
Also, there is no “graduating” status.
t;> Alan.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:21 PM Alan Gates wrote:
>>
>>> I found the instructions for that here:
>>> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transferring.html
>>> I didn't put in the resolution link yet because there's no such link
>>
Hi Justin,
Thank you for bringing this issue forward!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given a few issues that have come up recently, and it seems to be something
> that some podlings check just before they want to graduate rather than
> ac
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 7:37 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Perhaps it was unclear but I was thinking of adding that to teh quarterly
> report.
>
>> I would start with:
>>
>> 0. Has the VP, Brand approved the project name? Does the podling understand
>> the nuance
Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the dev@echarts thread.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 11, 2019, at 10:38 AM, SHUANG SU wrote:
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of Apache ECharts
> (incubating) 4.5.0 (release candidate 2).
>
> Apache ECharts community ha
the
> IPMC members to review and vote on this incubator release.
>
> The results of the Release Candidate 1 votes are below:
>
> - Binded Approvals: 1
>
> * Dave Fisher
>
> - Vote Thread
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/heron-dev/201911.mbox/%3CCAF
Hi -
I failed on Catalina as well. It was in bazel_configure.py due to Xcode now
identifies as:
FAILED: Could not determine the version of /usr/bin/clang from the following
output
/usr/bin/clang --version
Apple clang version 11.0.0 (clang-1100.0.33.12)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.0.0
Thread
Hi Justin,
This is great information. Thanks!
Please provide both median and mean values. I looked at Chinese podlings for my
talk at COSCon 2019. The median was less than the mean due to the pull from
projects taking a long time.
Your numbers do look similar.
These are important numbers. Are
Hi Justin,
I checked Dubbo and they still refer to all their past releases on dist and not
archives on:
http://dubbo.apache.org/en-us/blog/download.html
I think that it is fair that the incubator let current TLPs know that these old
releases are going away.
See http://incubator.apache.org/clu
- Incubating in name
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Checked PGP signatures
> - Checked Checksums
> - Code compiles and tests successfully run
>
>- Dave Fisher (+1 bi
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 16, 2019, at 6:44 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 5:16 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>> ...
>
>> There is a possible alternative and that is to not have a incubating area
>> and have all projects just use /dist/dev/ and
>> /dist/release/. That
Hi -
We are calling the movement of Omid and Tephra graduation to a project. To me
this looks more like retirement where a podling moves on to a new place after
failing to incubate. This distinction makes no difference to the podling. It
does matter to the Incubator as we measure our success in
Hi Justin,
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 1:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> I’m going to change podlings.xml to reflect these as “graduated”. If after
>> discussion we have consensus to change these to “retired” then the change is
>> easy.
>
> To officially graduate that would need a board p
and community to work with. Past Omid and
> Tephra committers can become Phoenix committers. Phoenix is a stable TLP.
> This looks like a success.
>
>
>> On Nov 21, 2019, at 4:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>>>> On Nov 21
Reading glasses will enlarge things for many of us.
I’m certainly in favor a larger font, but please keep it serifed.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 27, 2019, at 11:48 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> The problem might just be that pixels are getting smaller.
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:15
I share Ted’s concerns.
It would help if the initial committer list was greater than the bare minimum
of three. Three PPMC members is not enough. There needs to be at least five
committers to start.
(Should there be an explicit minimum in the proposal template?)
It’s often the case that some i
Hi -
My concerns have been addressed. I think we can proceed with the VOTE. I intend
to be +1(binding)
Regards,
Dave
> On Dec 2, 2019, at 11:08 AM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> IPMC hat on...
>
>> On Dec 2, 2019, at 2:05 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>>
>> Bertrand Delacretaz 于2019年12月2日周一 下午4:24写
Hi Junping,
I’m currently mentoring five podlings which is probably two more than I should
since I’ve joined the board.
Also, I’m interested in the OSSBot project...
Good luck with NuttX!
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 2, 2019, at 4:57 PM, 俊平堵 wrote:
>
> Sounds like most of co
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 3, 2019, at 9:30 PM, 俊平堵 wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> The [DISCUSS] thread on NuttX has died down.
>
>
> Accordingly, I would like to call a VOTE to accept NuttX into the
>
> Apache Incubator.
>
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
>
> [
+1 to BatchEE “Graduating to Geronimo”
Regards,
Dave
> On Dec 6, 2019, at 1:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> BatchEE community voted to leave the incubator to join Apache Geronimo as a
> subproject.
>
> Here is the vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/b
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 7, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
>
> Earlier this year, Druid voted to graduate to a top level project. The vote
> passed in the Druid community and the Incubator, and a resolution was
> submitted to the Board, but needed to be s
Hi -
Very interesting proposal. +1.
Please note that two of your nominated mentors will need to ask to join the
IPMC by request at private@i.a.o
Regards,
Dave
> On Dec 11, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Weiwei Yang wrote:
>
> Greetings folks:
>
> Please consider the following proposal, which is also on
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 10, 2020, at 9:47 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote on accepting YuniKorn into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Please see the discussion thread [1].
>
> Please see the full proposal:
> https://cwiki.
Hi -
> On Jan 15, 2020, at 5:45 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> I would recommend breaking up the pages so that every project edits its own
>> page
>> and doesn't risk modifying or (deleting! ) any of the other projects!
>
> Most project do edit or collate their reports on their own wik
Hi -
I signed up to moderate private@incubator sometime last year. I’ve confirmed
many subscriptions since. This includes several in the past week.
In order to help their podlings Mentors need to understand moderation in order
to establish the podling PPMC properly.
Doing a search on www.apach
Hi Ning,
I think I recall that I woke up one morning to find four subscription requests
from you. It could have been someone else. All requests to private-subscribe
need a human response to an email to the moderators. The moderator then must
respond to the most recent request. Multiple requests
Inline
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 16, 2020, at 4:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 6:25 AM Justin Mclean
>> wrote:
>> ...Do we want to consider the drastic step of removing all IPMC from the PMC
>> who are not signed
>> up to the private mailing li
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 16, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Only the Board can remove members from a PMC, and "lack of activity" not
>> one they typically support.
>
> +1 We are not considering removing inactive IPMC members, they can ask be be
> removed if tha
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 16, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I think that without an explicit resignation they must remain IPMC members.
>
> That's what I was saying. But in that case do they need to be on the roster?
Yes, the roster is the source of record of the
Hi -
I concur with Greg. There are two types of IPMC members who are not subscribed
to private@. Those who are Apache Members who can always ask to rejoin and
others who were voted onto the IPMC would need to be added again - let’s limit
mistakes with the second group. [1]
I would suggest that
Inline
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 21, 2020, at 9:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I concur with Greg. There are two types of IPMC members who are not
>> subscribed to private@. Those who are Apache Members who can always ask to
>> rejoin and others who were voted onto the IPMC wou
+1 (binding)
> On Jan 23, 2020, at 7:13 AM, Javi Roman wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, despite an effort to reboot the project about more than one
> year, we weren't successful in keeping the existing committers active. At
> this point, a decision to retire the podling was taken, and a vote was done
>
Hi -
All cleaned up. The clutch analysis cannot handle multiple URL for some of the
items in the project xml.
Nuttx was the trouble.
--- nuttx.xml (revision 1873270)
+++ nuttx.xml (working copy)
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
Bug tracking
.
-https://issues.a
Hi Justin,
We will need the resolution language. Here is a start:
-
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors requires Project Management Committee
Members subscribe to their Project’s Private Mailing List, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors is in receipt of a list of Incubator PMC Members
who are n
This is very interesting. You’ve got a good set of mentors!
If you are looking for a fourth mentor then I volunteer if you are interested.
Regards,
Dave
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 4:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Good time of the time to all!
>
> I'd like to bring this new interesting project
Hi -
A little research on Google, Quadra and LinkedIn shows that DataLingvo and
NLPCraft seem to be the same with a name change.
Regards,
Dave
> On Feb 5, 2020, at 5:24 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> Is there perhaps a language problem? I often have trouble saying what I mean
> in a way that ca
Inline.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2020, at 5:07 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Looks like the discussion is winding down a bit. So, to sum it up:
>
> - CC shall be removed during code transfer to ASF
> - an SGA will be expected from DataLingvo
> - as the original NLPCraft developers
> +Weex UI
You need to fix this.
Thanks,
Dave
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: pa...@apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1873757 -
> /incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/index.xml
> Date: February 7, 2020 at 5:28:20 PM EST
> To: c...@incubator.apache.org
> Reply-To: gene
+1 (binding)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 9, 2020, at 2:10 PM, Felix Cheung wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:54 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has b
I’ll take a look at that in the next 24 hours.
Chances are either the xml has trouble or clutch is having trouble with the xml
for what it extracts.
This is part is both Anakia and clutch2.py.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 20, 2020, at 11:21 AM, Eric Barboni (Jira) wrote:
>
>
The clutch process produces proper release links for all podling releases. That
could be extended to artifacts in the dev part of dist.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 27, 2020, at 4:37 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> There already is a policy in place that requires projects to have
http://datasketches.apache.org/docs/Community/Downloads.html
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 3, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Alexander Saydakov
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> DataSketches (
> http://datasketches.incubator.apache.org/docs/Community/Downloads.htm)
>> Links to signatures and hashes are missing
>
> I a
Hi -
There was a request in the Discussion to allow a look at the now private
repository. Was that link ever provided? I really cannot vote +1 until I can
get a chance to minimally review the repository.
Regards,
Dave
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 11:29 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Fo
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 3:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 10:15 AM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>> The new URL to use is https://downloads.apache.org. ...
The clutch analysis for each podling now refers to downloads.apache.org.
Index: clutch2.py
Lee,
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 17, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Because our project is split up into language and dependency-related
>> components, choosing what to download varies by what the user needs.
>> Attempting to replicate this hierarchy on the downloads
Hi -
I do think that the “user” page should be discussed with either Sally at press@
or Mark at trademarks@. They will know best how to create a compliant version
of what you are trying to do.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 18, 2020, at 6:29 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Hi Justin,
NLPCraft is new this month. The podling is in the table of contents, but not
the body of the report. There is some work on the report on dev@nlpcraft. Stay
tuned.
Regards,
Dave
> On Apr 1, 2020, at 11:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Reports were due yesterday//today (depe
From my time on the Board there is often a decision to have a board member ask
non-reporting projects to do a roll call.
Perhaps the best text for this that I’ve seen is from Ted Dunning. I’ve adapted
this for podlings. I think it would be helpful for Mentors who find that a
podling is non-resp
> On Apr 8, 2020, at 12:42 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> I suggest:
>> a) Changing the language of such banners to "Pull Requests Welcome"
>> (because "forking" can be misunderstood and due to our fierce
>> corporate independence principle)
>> b) Asking our projects to add a "rel=nofo
Hi Chris,
There should not be a question. If these are official Apache packages from the
project published on Maven Central with org.apache co-ordinates then they must
meet all of release policy and include NOTICE, LICENSE, and, if incubating,
DISCLAIMER. They must also be released on the offic
...
> nor could I find it ... I totally agree with you, that it should be that way,
> but I couldn't find a written baking of that position so I could vote -1 and
> send a pointer to some documentation.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Am 09.04.20, 20:01 schrieb "Dave
these binaries going through
proper VOTE procedures?
Regards,
Dave
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Am 09.04.20, 20:12 schrieb "Dave Fisher" :
>
>The DISCLAIMER is an Incubator requirement.
>
>https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaim
> On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Eya Badal Abdisho
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/04/09 01:09:57, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>> Feel the same thing.
>>
>> I see the contributors of these two projects are almost the same so I
>> assume that the old AgensGraph is also maintained by the same community an
Hi Jim,
I am not sure about this project and have concerns:
(1) If you look at https://bitnine.net/agensgraph/ you will note that
AgensGraph is a product name.
(2) The community is being called AgensGraph Extension and it is very likely
that the VP, Brand will not approve.
I’m concerned about
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 14, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 14, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>> I’m also concerned about the experience level of the mentors and we have not
>> heard from any of t
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 14, 2020, at 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Answers inline:
>
>> On Apr 14, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> I am not sure about this project and have concerns:
>>
>> (1) I
Hi Jim,
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 5:07 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 15, 2020, at 5:28 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:30 AM David Nalley wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:55 PM Justin Mclean
>>> wrote:
...I’d sugges
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 5:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On Apr 14, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Certainly this is a concern of all incoming podlings though, isn't it?
>>> Isn&#x
+1 (binding)
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> We would like to propose AgensGraph Extension as an Apache incubator project.
> As such, I am calling a VOTE.
>
> The AgensGraph Extension provides an extension for PostgreSQL to give the
> users the ability to leverage grap
+1 (binding).
Best Regards,
Dave
> On May 15, 2020, at 6:50 PM, Vinoth Chandar wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to call for a VOTE for graduating Apache Hudi (Incubating), as
> a top level project.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate Apache Hudi from the
> incubat
+1 (binding)
Best Regards,
Dave
> On May 15, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> With the support of our mentors (as well as helpful ASF members), the
> Apache Iceberg community has voted to graduate to a top-level project.
>
> I propose a vote to recommend graduation for
It’s past time to close this vote. The Board made Iceberg a TLP in today’s
meeting! Congratulations!!!
Best Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 20, 2020, at 6:46 PM, Yu Li wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
>> On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 03:12, Hitesh Shah wrote:
>>
+1 (binding)
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 24, 2020, at 11:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Following the discussion about BlueMarlin, I would like to start a formal
> vote to accept BlueMarlin into the incubator.
>
> As reminder, here’s the proposal:
> https://cwiki.
No, why? Please revert this.
Please discuss with the Petri PMC.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 1:37 PM, c...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: cml
> Date: Mon Jun 1 20:37:10 2020
> New Revision: 1878377
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1878377&view=rev
> Log:
> treat petri pro
Thank you Alan for all your support for the Incubator and Mentoring.
SAMOA now has zero mentors and Superset has one.
Experienced mentors requested.
Superset seems close to graduation
SAMOA is currently our oldest podling, but had a release in April.
Regards,
Dave
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 5:18 PM
If there is consensus why vote?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 5, 2020, at 6:04 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given there no more discussion here I guess I’ll assume it’s good and I’ll
> put it up for a VOTE. These can be modified as needed later.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---
Hi -
Big observation. I’m uncomfortable with the Incubator making Apache Policy
beyond adding DISCLAIMERs. Other Board and Operations VPs have been delegated
policy making. Yes, that is hard and unclear. Perhaps this proposal could
inform those discussions.
More inline.
> On Jul 5, 2020, at 7
-1 (binding)
This lacks proper reference to existing Apache Policies and instead rewrites
it. I think that this is outside the Incubator’s remit.
Regards,
Dave
> On Jul 5, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This vote is to make this official [1] and move the guidelines to the
Hi -
You note over 30 contributors to GeoSpark, but there are only 8 initial
committers. Has the move to the Apache Incubator been thoroughly discussed in
the existing community? Is anyone being excluded?
Best Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 12, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Felix Cheung wro
Hi Justin,
To me the Foundation Dev Guidance comes first and it is currently buried within
the Incubator policy and guidance.
A reference to http://www.apache.org/dev/#releases ought to be first from any
incubator policy or guidance page. Problems with the dev page should be
addressed. If the
Mentors are volunteers. Daffodil has only two mentors. For a long time it was a
single mentor.
Anyone interested in mentoring Daffodil? The only issue preventing graduation
is lack of diversity.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 13, 2020, at 7:25 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:43 AM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I did find some minor issues though, please see below.
> I would really suggest to start maintaining a RELEASE_NOTES file. I usually
> have a look at this in order to see what to expect of the new release.
>
> Ch
+1 (binding)
NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER are good.
Checksums and signatures are good.
Incubating in name.
3 of the 4 binary artifacts are equivalent aside from shell script in rpm.
Did not unpack the msi so can’t vouch for that content. (I don’t have windows)
sbt ratCheck is good.
Compiles and
+1 (binding)
> On Jul 15, 2020, at 8:49 PM, Felix Cheung wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As we discussed the Sedona proposal [1], I would like to call for a vote to
> accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Sedona is a big geospatial data processing engine. The system provides an
> easy to use Scala,
901 - 1000 of 1241 matches
Mail list logo
